Mein Kamph Analysis

Undoubtedly, Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kamph stands as one of the most historically destructive mediums of discourse, promoting the pseudo-scientific and bigoted ideologies reflective of the Nazi Party. It is then in question, due to recent publication controversy, whether Mein Kamph should be produced for public access. In a fundamental sense, our acceptance of the book’s republication is a question of morality and human capacity: Are we able to critically analyze and learn from Hitler’s damaging beliefs, or will Mein Kamph simply act as a means of promoting an otherwise shadowed intolerance? Within limitations, it is my belief that Mein Kamph has a place in contemporary literature, so far as it is critically studied without reserve, and regarded as a text that teaches of human’s capacity to negatively propagate and influence others.

The publication of Mein Kamph, first and foremost, would bring to reality a number of contemporary societal issues. For instance, Hitler (1933) regularly refers the “Jewish Problem,” implying the Jewish population was restrictive to the development of the Aryan race. Although dated, the sentiment of Hitler’s ideology is chillingly present in the modern international community. Anti-Semitism in fact still persists, most prevalently found in the Middle East
What may be beneficial, then, would be to use Mein Kamph as a means of beginning to understand why and where anti-Semitic beliefs stem from. By utilizing it as a tool for understanding, we begin to develop considerations for how to tackle contemporary anti-Semitic issues. Indeed, many forms and subdivisions of anti-Semitism may have spawned from impressionable interpretations of Mein Kamph. As such, its republication provides a unique opportunity to approach contemporary anti-Semitism from a historically critical and interdisciplinary