Preview

Medtronic Inc. V. Jones Case Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1288 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Medtronic Inc. V. Jones Case Summary
1.
4–3. Business Torts. Medtronic, Inc., is a medical technology company that competes for customers with St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. James Hughes worked for Medtronic as a sales manager. His contract prohibited him from working for a competitor for one year after leaving Medtronic. Hughes sought a position as a sales director for St. Jude. St. Jude told Hughes that his contract with Medtronic was unenforceable and offered him a job. Hughes accepted. Medtronic filed a suit, alleging wrongful interference. Which type of interference was most likely the basis for this suit? Did it occur here? Explain. [Medtronic, Inc. v. Hughes, 2011 WL 134973 (Minn.App. 2011)] (See Intentional Torts against Persons.)

Answer: For this suit, there is a wrongful
…show more content…
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. While living in her home country of Tanzania, Sophia Kiwanuka signed an employment contract with Anne Margareth Bakilana, a Tanzanian living in Washington, D.C. Kiwanuka traveled to the United States to work as a babysitter and maid in Bakilana’s house. When Kiwanuka arrived, Bakilana confiscated her passport, held her in isolation, and forced her to work long hours under threat of having her deported. Kiwanuka worked seven days a week without breaks and was subjected to regular verbal and psychological abuse by Bakilana. Kiwanuka filed a complaint against Bakilana for intentional infliction of emotional distress, among other claims. Bakilana argued that Kiwanuka’s complaint should be dismissed because the allegations were insufficient to show outrageous intentional conduct that resulted in severe emotional distress. If you were the judge, in whose favor would you rule? Why? [Kiwanuka v. Bakilana, 844 F.Supp.2d 107 (D.D.C. 2012)] (See Intentional Torts against Persons.)

Answer: As a judge, I would rule in favor for Kiwanuka. It’s because Kiwanuka is an immigrant who came to only obtain a job as a babysitter and maid. Bakilana performed an extreme and outrageous behavior such as threatening to have Kiwanuka deported, having her work seven days a week without breaks, and verbally and psychologically abusing her on a regular basis. As a result, these claims qualify for emotional distress of
…show more content…
In addition, the hotel was careless to have the guests “step out onto the balcony” to smoke without giving a warning about the twelve- inch gap. Because of the gap, Lucario, an innocent hotel guest, fell to her death, which is a serious and permanent injury. Weatherford may assert the reasonable person standard, which is the standard of behavior expected of a hypothetical “reasonable person,” in its defense. They could say that a reasonable person would have notice the big twelve-inch gap and do his/ her best to avoid

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On November 28, 2008 our office received a phone call from a distraught woman, her name was Karla Girroir. She stated her husband was in a severe car accident while driving their antique mobile home back to their house on Thanksgiving’s Eve. I listened carefully, documenting her every word as she sobbed out the facts regarding her husband’s condition. I offered to schedule an appointment as quickly as possible with Janice Fisher, our attorney. She advised me she was unable to come in because her husband had fallen into a coma and she needed to be by his side. I stayed late waiting for Janice to finish up with her other clients. I couldn’t get Mr. Girroir’s case off of my mind and I had to speak to her before I could go home. I discussed the case with Janice and she immediately called Mrs. Girroir, I acted as a translator between Janice and Mrs. Girroir as she spoke very little English and fluent Spanish. We were advised that Mrs. Girroir had no way of transportation for herself or her twin daughters to come into the office. So Janice offered to meet her at the hospital.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: On March 20, 1982, plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sustained serious injuries while skiing at Jimmy Peak Ski Resort. On December 5, 1984 plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sued defendant Jimmy Peak. Plaintiff alleged that her injuries were caused by defective ski equipment she had rented from the rental facility on the premises. She further alleged that the defendant failed to inspect ski equipment and the failure amounted to negligence and breach of contract. An amended complaint was filed on February 14, 1986, the plaintiff added counts that the defendant had breached warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The defendant moved for summary judgment which was granted by a judge of the Superior Court on the ground that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations. The case was transferred to Massachusetts’s Supreme Court by its own motion.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1980, patient (plaintiff) James Johnson filed suit against Misericordia Community Hospital alleging medical malpractice. The suit specifically alleged corporate negligence in the appointment of Dr. Lester V. Salinksy (independent member) to the medical staff at Misericordia Community Hospital. During the surgery, Dr. Salinsky severed the femoral artery, resulting in partial paralysis for Johnson (casebriefs.com). Ultimately, Johnson suffered a permanent paralytic condition to his right thigh muscles with resultant atrophy and weakness as well as a loss of function after undergoing hip surgery performed by Dr. Salinsky (Showalter,…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first rule applied in this case was the rule of libel and slander, which states that the cause of defamation must include four elements: “1) a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff; 2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; 3) fault by the defendant amounting at least to negligence; and 4) special harm of the actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm.” (822) Libel is the defamation of one’s character in written form, and slander is the…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Jones L Introduction to Business Law 1st, 2011, C11 the Tort Law of Negligence. P342…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    BUGusa Inc. Worksheet

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: FindLaw Inc. (November 1, 1999). Business Torts: Misrepresentation, Interference and Unfair Competition. Retrieved from http://www.inc.com/articles/1999/11/15387.html…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones Case Study

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since it seems like the Jones’ are set on having a family and that family is important to them this scenario will focus more on what could be best for them to do to make sure their family life is stable.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: This lawsuit involves Dred Scott, an African American slave and his owner due to the passing of his previous owner Dr. Emerson, John F. A. Sanford. John F.A Sanford is the brother to the wife of Dr. Emerson. Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Missouri Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis on April 6, 1846 . Dred Scott’s legal suit is for assault and false imprisonment: “A slave could be punished and kept as property, but a free person could not.”…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yunker V. Honeywell

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. The court meant by its statement that negligent hiring and negligent retention “rely on liability on the part of an individual or a business that has been on the basis of negligence or other factors resulting in harm or damage to another individual or their property” (Luthra, 2011) and not on “an obligation that arises from the relationship of one party with another” (Luthra, 2011). The court meant that “negligent hiring and negligent retention do not rely on the scope of employment but address risks created by exposing members of the public to a potentially dangerous individual” (McAdams, 2007, pg. 457).…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appellant interfered with Respondent’s prospective economic relationship with JFI, but there was nothing else sufficient to indicate a wrongful conduct outside of interference itself because Appellant made a demand for debt that was owed to her and JFI rightfully terminated its relationship in order to keep its business a float.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of Kiwanuka v. Bakilana, Bakilana did cause emotional distress to Ms. Kiwanuka by threatening her with deportation, making her work twenty-four hours a day, grabbing her by the shirt collar, and taking her passport and papers which are extreme and outrageous acts and were intentionally committed.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federal Trade Comission

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this case, the practices of the respondents went against the welfare of the public, constitute unfair methods of competition and antitrust actions. This anti competitive action cost health plan, employers and patients, more than $1,000,000 for surgical services in 1998 and 1999 in the Austin, Texas area.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sutton v. Tomco Machining

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts of the Case: In this appeal, DeWayne Sutton, an employee of Tomco Machining, Inc. claimed that he injured his back on the job while disassembling a chop saw. Sutton alleged that he was fired within one hour of reporting the workplace injury to Tomco’s president, Jim Tomasiak. No reason was specified in the termination; however he was told the firing was not due to his work ethic or job performance or because he had broken any work rule or company policy.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Laws 310 Week 3

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. You are the judge in the case. Does Susie have a case against Ruthless? Is Ruthless the proximate cause of Susie’s injuries?…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Petitioner was John F. Tinker, Mary Beth Tinker, and Christopher Eckhardt, high school students in Des Moines, Iowa. In December 1964 several students were joined in protesting the Vietnam War. The form of protest was to wear a black armband for two weeks. When protesters arrived at school they were told to remove the arm bands or be suspended. Students took the suspension and did not return to school until after the protest period ended on New Year’s Eve 1965.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays