Preview

Medicine During the Civil War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1798 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Medicine During the Civil War
Medicine During the Civil War 1861-1865

When Walt Whitman wrote that he believed the "real war" would never get into the books, this is the side he was talking about (Belferman 1996). Yet, it is important that we remember and recall the medical side of the conflict too, as horrible and terrifying as it was (Adams 1952). Long before doctors and people knew anything about bacteria and what caused disease was the time of Civil War medicine. Doctors during the Civil War (always referred to as "surgeons") were incredibly unprepared. Most surgeons had as little as two years of medical school because very few pursued further education. At that time, Harvard Medical School did not even own a single stethoscope or microscope until well after the war. Most Civil War surgeons had never treated a gun shot wound because they were accustomed to treating minor head colds and sore throats. Many had never performed surgery or even held a scalpel. Medical boards let extremely unqualified students practice medicine due to much needed help for wounded soldiers on the battlefield. "Some ten thousand surgeons served in the Union and about four thousand served in the Southern Confederacy (Cunningham 1958)."

By far, the deadliest thing that faced the Civil War soldier was disease and infection. For every soldier who died in battle, two died of disease (Cunningham 1958). Among the long list of terminal and fatal diseases that plagued the battlefield as well as the operating table and hospitals were dysentery (a severe form of diarrhea which was very common among the soldiers), measles, small pox, malaria, pneumonia, and "camp itch" which was caused by skin disease and insects. Malaria was usually brought on by camping in damp areas, where mosquitos were prone to. There were many factors that came into play which explained why disease spread so rapidly. Among the explanations were as follows: inadequate physicals before entering the Army, the fact many troops came from rural areas,



Cited: Adams, George W. Doctors In Blue,"Medical History of the Union" Baton Rouge:University of Louisiana Press, 1952 Belferman, Mary "On Surgery 's Cutting Edge in the Civil War" The Washington Post, June 13, 1996 Cunningham, H.H. Doctors in Gray, Baton Rouge: University of Louisiana Press, 1958 Coco, Gregory A. A Strange and Blighted Land-Gettysburg, The Aftermath, 1995 Schildt, John W. Hunter Homes McGuire:Doctor in Gray, 1986 Adams, George W. "Fighting for Time" The National Historical Society 's-The Image of War 1861-1865 Volume IV

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The working conditions for doctors during the civil war was terrible. They used unsanitary tools and garments. 66.95372517% of the casualties in the war came from diseases. After the war, they made advances on the working conditions of the medical personnel. Another effect of the Civil War was that 2% of the entire American population died during the Civil War. Most of these casualties were men in their 20’s. This meant that 2% of the population was without someone to love. The worst part was that everybody in the war was American, making the population decrease twice as fast. As you can see, these two, were affected greatly by the war.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Sources D and E are useful to the historian who is investigating surgical practice in the 1870s, however only to a certain extent because both sources explain a few of the negatives and positives of surgical practice. In source D, it says that ‘it took too long to keep washing everything’ and how people who would think of new ideas in surgical practice were often regarded as ‘odd’. This evidence shows us that surgical practice at the time may have been a more negative experience rather than a positive one. Source E, on the other hand, talks a little less broadly about surgical practice as it explains, like source D, ‘infection was as common as ever’ and talks about the transitions from one operating theatre to the next.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When people picture the Civil War amputations, they often picture piles of limps stacked around a battlefield and a surgeon as a butcher. However, this picture is not true to the real nature of battlefield medicine. Amputation was the most common surgery throughout the Civil War. The Civil War leads to advancement in amputation and quality of life for those who had amputation. Artificial limbs also came into the picture helping former soldiers lead a better quality life.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Surgery during the American Revolution and the war was not always pretty, in fact most of the time it was horrible and unsanitary. Doctors at the time had a very little understanding of how the human body functioned, especially compared today's knowledge. The doctors where not normally trained and had a bad conception of sanitation, hygiene, healthy food, clean water, and how not to spread harmful diseases. The most common civil war surgery was the amputation. (field surgery). It was not uncommon at all to see a fellow war soldier with a missing arm or leg, this was a very visitable reminder or the negative sides of war. There were painful things done to try and save a fellow-men in emergencies by those who had really no idea how to go about it properly. Another common way people thought was a good way to cure the body of any disease back then was called “bleeding.” Bleeding is the precess of opening a vein, and mean while keeping the soldier relaxed, as the blood pores out of the body and into a pale. No operation of surgery was so frequently used as much as bleeding ( of bleeding). Bleeding was normally performed after any type of injury to the body that was not miner and didn't need to be amputated. Bleeding was also a way that people thought would get a disease out of your body, although that is not how it works, some people died, when they did not have too. Surgeons did not know how much damage they were causing when this accrued, but they knew enough to let a small child bleed less then a grown soldier. But they often let the patients bleed until they fainted, which was a long time for some, who soon died after the passed out.(of bleeding). The damage caused from this were very high and hard to fix, it was often hard to stop the bleeding, and if it was it left huge wounds that were not easily headed.(of bleeding). The troubles that soldiers went threw in was were some of the…

    • 393 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the beginning of the Civil War, most people thought the war would only last a few weeks or months, so not much effort was put into recruiting doctors or surgeons. The surgeons that were recruited did not have formal training in medicine. They knew little about bacteriology and were ignorant of what caused the killer diseases. Most Civil War surgeons had never treated a gun shot wound or had actually performed surgery. They typically had two years of schooling, with only bookwork in the first year. The second year was usually a review of the first, with little hands-on training. These doctors tried the best they could to treat the wounded soldiers, and their knowledge of medicine improved each year.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American Civil War proved to be the United States deadliest war, with more casualties than World War I and World War II combined.1 The greatest fear of the Union soldier, however, may not have been a quick death by the gun, but rather a slow one caused by the presence of disease. While terrifying for the soldiers, the physicians found themselves with seemingly endless opportunities to study disease, leading to an evolution in the treatment of multiple diseases. The American Civil War’s production of multiple corpses, unsanitary camps, and unsanitary medical equipment lead to this medical revolution. The battle environment allowed physicians the opportunity to study the etiology of disease, its effects on the human body, and prevention strategies,…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sickness nicknamed the “Old Soldier’s Disease” was most likely a case of a disease like dysentery. It wasn’t lethal, but it was a large inconvenience and caused problems and discomfort for soldiers. More lethal wounds came from the bullets. Major General Reynolds died instantly from a bullet to the head, however, others don’t face a quick death like that. Private Kilrain was shot mortally and later died in the hospital because his heart couldn’t take it. His friend Chamberlain, however, was fine, however, he got a bad wound on his foot. Chamberlain used dirty rags to bind his wounds, which goes to show you that they lacked clean supplies and didn’t know dirty supplies equated to disease. General Hood also faced and injury like Kilrain but less lethal and didn’t need to be amputated, however, his arm became unusable and useless. Most amputations occurred because of the type of bullets used in the war. The round bullets caused bones to shatter rather than pierce through the body, which caused more problems for the victims. To continue more problems, the amputations that did occur called for a high risk of disease. Additionally, there were smaller problems compared to amputations, like rations of food and water. Soldier’s had to deal with lack of food and rest, becoming more susceptible to sickness and…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War I, there were many issues that surrounded the health of troops. The lack of medical advancement and the knowledge of it, then the struggle of keeping ones self-healthy throughout combat were key points to survival. During World War I in less than a year, American troops suffered more than 318,000 injuries 120,000 were counted as casualties. The front line soldiers are always at the highest risk in any war. With World War I though, trench warfare was a dangerous place to be considering they were always at risk for disease or infection because they were in the poorest conditions. During World War I, the Black Plague was one of the most drastic plagues in history. The troops would try anything and everything to help the disease not run like a wild fire. Soldiers would use herbs to blow away bad smells of the sewer and clean the contaminated air. During the war, soldiers would…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Diseases have long affected wars, often killing more soldiers than combat. During the War of 1812, for example, diseases like dysentery and malaria were the number one killer on the battlefield. Robert Koch’s germ theory was not introduced until 1890, so doctors had no reason to believe disease and infection was due to microscopic organisms or viruses. Treatments from the colonial era until the late 1800s show the extent of the misunderstanding of illnesses. Popular cures, such as bloodletting and a mercury compound called calomel, often left the patient weak and dehydrated, making them a prime target for further…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Medical History

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Misconceptions about the brutality of military medicine in the Civil War often come from myths concluding that amputations, as well as common surgeries, were executed carelessly. Doctors were dealing with mass injuries that the world had never dealt with before. In the years before the war began, “Surgeons at one of the premier hospitals of the time, Massachusetts General Hospital were performing fewer than 200 surgical procedures of any kind on average per year” (Bishop). Within the first few months of the start of the war doctors who had no prior surgical experience were exceeding the number of procedures preformed by hospital experts in a matter of days (Barnes). By the end of the war, Union doctors had recorded almost 30,000 amputations…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Puritan religion and eighteenth century Deist thinking are two different movements. The ideas expressed in each of these movements follow the same guidelines but with different principles when describing how one should act through their daily lives. Whether it be through following the expectations of God or through self improvement, Puritan and Deist thinking go through different ways to live by to be the best person one should be.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arriving in 2006, through the combined efforts of Marcus Ackroyd, Laurence Brocklick, Michael Moss, Kate Redford, and John Stevenson’s comes Advancing with the Army: Medicine, the Professions, and Social Mobility in the British Isles, 1790-1850. This book breaks disciplinary boundaries between medical, military, and social history in an effort to enrich the field. Although the book deals mainly with professionalization of doctors in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, it shows how military surgeons and doctors fit into British Strategy. This book reveals many things about the military and surgeon works such as a disproportionate amount of Scots as surgeons and most young doctors were younger sons from nonmedical families. Before…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    A Breakthrough

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many doctors, however were unprepared to treat terrible wounds,that resulted from amputations. The state of medical knowledge during the Civil war was extremely basic. Their experience mostly included pulling rotten teeth or lancing boils. Doctors did not understand infection or how easy it was to get one, and as a result they did little to prevent it. They did not recognize the lack of for cleanliness and sanitation as a cause of infection. Little was known about bacteria and germs. In fact, for the longest time during the Civil war, bandages were used over and over, on different people without being cleaned.1.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Works Cited

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "National Museum of Civil War Medicine." National Museum of Civil War Medicine. CIVILWARMED, 17 Oct. 2010. Web. 18 May 2013. Gaseous ether and chloroform were both widely available and there therapeutic impact was well known in Union and Confederate medical services. Major surgery was carried out using these anesthetics if they were available. It is estimated that greater than 90% of all major surgery was carried out with anesthetics.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source D is from a recent exhibition at the National Army Museum about the treatment of the wounded during the First World War. The strengths of this source in terms of a historian enquiring into the problems experienced by surgeons when dealing with battlefield casualties during the First World War are that it is recent and therefore has the benefit of hindsight and due to it being a secondary source the information presented is well researched, it is also specific in terms of the problems faced by the battlefield surgeons as it outlines that “the trenches were unhealthy, so battle injuries were always contaminated” and “jagged shell fragments forced pieces of uniform and bacteria deep into open wounds” as well as the causes of death not being the injuries themselves but “deadly infection.” The limitations of Source D in terms of usefulness to a historian could be that it is not extremely detailed about the difficulties of surgeons dealing with battlefield casualties during the First World War this is due to the fact it is a secondary source and is therefore a generalisation of many surgeons experiences rather than a detailed account. Source E is from an account by Henry Percy Pickerill, a pioneer of plastic surgery. He is recalling surgical techniques used in 1917 to rebuild the faces of the wounded. The strengths of this source in terms of usefulness to a historian studying the experiences of battlefield surgeons are that it is a primary source and is therefore very accurate in terms of Pickerill’s experience during the First World War another strength of this source is that he seems to be writing to inform about the techniques of skin grafting rather than relaying the experience of working as a surgeon during the War. The limitations of Source E is terms of usefulness are that is only contains one experience of a plastic surgeon accounting upon “the techniques of skin grafting” which was probably not the most important types of surgeons or procedures needed…

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays