Preview

Medical Negligence Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Medical Negligence Research Paper
Three Ways Medical Negligence Can Lead to Injuries to a Baby or a Mother

Birth injuries to a child or the mother can happen through no one's fault, but there are situations where an injury could have been prevented. Through negligence on the part of a doctor or hospital staff, a child is harmed. This injury can have an impact throughout the child's life. A parent may be entitled to compensation for the increased medical and child care expenses due to this injury. The following are three situations when you should contact a personal injury attorney for consultation.

Proper tests were not performed
Given certain physical symptoms, there may have been one or more tests that could have been performed to diagnose an injury sooner. Knowing this
…show more content…
One example of this is a high fever. A high fever can affect the brain in a newborn and create long-term damage. In some cases, there may not have been anything that a doctor could have done differently, but if there is evidence that the fever was not addressed properly and in a timely manner, it could be a case of negligence. A baby can also be deprived of oxygen due to entanglement with the umbilical cord, resulting in loss of oxygen. If proper procedure was not followed, the life-long brain injuries may be due to …show more content…
If these injuries could have been prevented but are the result of negligence, a mother may be entitled to compensation. Common examples are infections that go unnoticed or untreated, and excessive bleeding that is not controlled properly.

The above examples are only three ways a birth injury could have been prevented, but not every injury can be prevented. Because these cases are highly technical, you need to consult with a personal injury lawyer with experience in birth injuries. He or she can listen to your situation and review the facts and details to help determine if you have a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnny was riding in his mother’s car when another car hit them. He suffered several leg and rib fractures and was taken to the local hospital for treatment. His injuries included a closed fracture of the right Tibia, and closed fracture of the 3rd and 4t ribs on the right side. Treatment included the closed reduction of his fractures. The hospital submitted an insurance claim to his parent’s medical insurance for payment. The insurance company denied payment.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This happened when you were recovering under the supervision of a medical professional. In this case, a personal injury lawyer will come to your rescue and make sure that medical injuries which had happened in a health care organization is due to faulty services and incompetent treatment. Your attorney will further prove the careless services and unprofessional treatment by health facility. Medical facilities which have in-house legal department will ask you to settle down the case. He will make them pay for their negligent services and ensure that you are getting a fair settlement. You may be unaware that how much amount you are supposed to get for your injuries, a personal injury lawyer Hamilton is well aware of these situations and he will gather all the evidences which are required for your case in the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Paper

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Weld, K., & Garmon Bibb, S. (2009). Concept analysis: malpractice and modern-day nursing practice. Nursing Forum, 44(1), 2-10. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence isn't the just factor that needs proof. You also need to illustrate the scope of seriousness. There need to be evidences of losses suffered; such as, health care expenses to take care of the injuries. There may also need evidence like missed income while getting well. Other losses may be the pain and suffering, physical disability, damaged facial look, psychological suffering and more.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Life In Australia

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was suggested by David Hirsch in an ABC radio talk show program that ‘wrongful life cases recognise that disabled people should have the same rights as everyone else, and if they find themselves in a situation where they are suffering with a disability, which they would not be suffering but for the negligence, then why shouldn’t they get compensation’. In other words a disabled person should be able to claim damages for their wrongful life, if it was in fact the negligence of the doctor that caused their disability. Therefore, suggesting that wrongful life should be a compensable tort in Australia to ensure that everyone is treated equally in the eyes of the law. Although it is suggested by Hirsch that ‘a disabled child born into a life of suffering and need as a consequence of medical negligence is entitled to nothing in a wrongful life claim because there is no injury in the eyes of the law’, the claims for wrongful life are more about the pain and suffering of the plaintiff and the people who care for them, as opposed to the actual physical disabilities that they have suffered as a result of the negligence. Wrongful life claims should therefore be a compensable tort as they should be about the pain and suffering and not about the disability. Awarding damages to plaintiffs is always an approximation and not an exact science as was the case in Skelton v Collins ; Ruddock v Taylor and Cattanach v Melchior. It was suggested in these cases that the courts have always assigned values to intangible injuries and nebulous losses, why should the case be different in this situation, just because the doctor cannot be held liable for damage caused to a baby before its born, it does not mean that…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be awarded damages under the tort of negligence, a claimant ‘must prove that the defendant is at fault for the injuries cited’ (Fenn et al, 2003, p.272), with fault being the operative word here. There are four key areas to consider under a negligence rule, these are: ‘(1) establishment of a duty of care, (2) evidence that the physician’s services did not conform to the appropriate standard of care, (3) a determination that the failure to act in accordance with the duty of care was the cause of the harm, and (4) existence of a physically objective and ascertainable injury’ (Horwitz & Brennan, 1995, p.167). The effect of this is an injurer is only liable for the cost of accidents if they have taken…

    • 3240 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence consists of four different elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. In order to collect damages for the harm done the claimant must prove several things: the duty of care one owes to another, the standard of care expected by one from another, breach of the duty of care, and damage(s) either physical, emotional or monetary. In…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Negligence law states that a person or an organization is generally liable when they negligently injure others.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One very important issue in this case and many civil lawsuits is negligence. Negligence is when there is a failure to use reasonable care which results in injury or damage to another. It also asks who is responsible for one’s injury. In this case, Mrs. McKoy claims her injuries were caused by T & J’s negligent behavior. In order to prove negligence, T & J must be guilty of five elements: duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington Case Law Case

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Under Washington case law, plaintiffs are required to prove causation with expert testimony if alleged injury involves obscure medical factors. [cite]. The trickier question is whether the expert needs to demonstrate a direct causal link between the alleged injuries and the negligent act or if the expert merely must demonstrate that the plaintiff’s injuries are of a type that can be caused by the negligent act. Washington courts have come down on both sides of this question.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence is defined as the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid injuring others or the property belonging to others. This would be if somebody does not exercise the amount of care that a reasonable careful person would use under the circumstances or somebody does something that a reasonably careful person would not do under the circumstances. Fault is essential in a negligence tort and is determined by basic elements. In negligence action there are four elements that play a large determining role. The four elements include duty of care, breach of duty by the tortfeasor, causation of injury to the victim and damages to the victim. The elements of negligence action work together in tort law to determine the level of negligence of the tortfeasor. The first element is the legal duty to conform to a certain standard of conduct in order to protect other from unreasonable risk of harm. The second element is the breach of duty by the tortfeasor failing to conform to a certain standard of conduct. The third element is the causation of injury and establishing a casual connection between the conduct and the injury, which comes in two components, actual cause or proximate cause. The final element of negligence action is damages to the victim being actual damages. This element is proving that a monetary figure can be attached to the negligence claim. The damages can come as compensatory damage, punitive damages, or damages attributable to actual loss of physical property. With all these elements in place fault is irrelevant.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Health care providers have a responsibility to provide competent and safe care to their patients. When patient care is compromised or the patient does not have a successful medical outcome, sometimes the legal system becomes involved. It is important to be aware of the terms negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice because they are often misunderstood. This paper attempts to provide a definition of each legal term in an effort to distinguish the difference between each term Application of negligence and malpractice will be applied through review of a newspaper article entitled, “Amputation mishap; negligence.” Effective documentation leaves no room for liability of the health care provider. After review of this paper, it is hopeful that the reader will feel well informed of the meanings of negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice and how to effectively chart in a patient’s medical record.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Death Claims

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are several scenarios in which a wrongful death claim may be applicable. Common examples include medical malpractice (e.g., misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, and prescription drug errors), an accident involving an automobile, boat, or aircraft,…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Case Brief

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While a tragic loss of life we will have an extremely hard time proving that our client’s death of her child was a direct result of the accident if she did not go to the hospital right after the accident. Anything within those four days could have happened during the pregnancy that the defendant could argue was not a result of the car accident. In addition the operating physicians are not under legal authority to say that definitely that the fetus could was stillborn as a cause of injuries resulting from the…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays