This research study delves looks into the public’s misconception of on the extent and nature and extent of the increased rate of youth crime and the youth justice system per se. Also, and the characteristics of such way such misconception and the adverse impact on youth who commit these crimes. . respond to youthful offending. Overall, umpteenth Various misconceptions have been identified concerning youth crimes in Canada. The media plays a major role in the public’s perception at times distoring actualities and creating an impression that It has been shown that, the public is made to believe that there is a drastic increase on in youth crime. The public’s perception is also justified by the statistics provided by the media. belief of the public has been mainly based on the number of statics availed by the media. Research has proven that The availed official statistics in respect to the extent and nature of youth crime, have shown that the public’s conception about the rapid increase on youth crime is not supported by the available official statistical data.
In exploratory research comparing the discrepancies between available statistics and official statistics with regard to the public’s misconceptions, it was decided to unravel the discrepancy which appears to shape the public’s attitude in this myth which seems to deliver negative impacts. Reasons for such kind of discrepancy between the available official statistics and public conceptions with regard to youth crime and the youth justice system have been explored. The key role of the media in the shaping of public attitude has been addressed in this study. The negative effects which arise from public misconceptions with regard to youth crime are explored. Major Among the negative effects of public misconception of youth crime, involve is making of unnecessary changes to existing legislation, on the legislation, public intolerance, and creating unnecessary and making of inappropriate programs for young offenders.
The paper makes cConclusive suggestions are provided in the hopes of bridging which are intended to bridge the gaps between the official statistics and the public’s misconception. Included in the recommendations are suggestions Among the recommendations given, it has been suggested that the media should be provided with given accurate proper information and statistics about the youth justice system, and the public be should also be educated enlightened about the criminal justice system. Also, inherent fear associated with youth crimes should be properly identified, acknowledged and addressed in order to curb, if not resolve the myths surrounding youth crimes. It has also been suggested that fears that are associated with youth crime should be acknowledged and adequately addressed.
The Yyoung oOffenders Act of 1984 (YOA)was introduced put in place in order to to reflect reconcile various issues of accountability and responsibility for with regard to the young offenders. According to Gates (2004), the a wide coverage of by the media in this respect with regard to youth crime has led many people to believe and conclude that the applicable policies provided pursuant to the under the Act were are not inefficient, indicating , by showing that youth crimes were are increasing continuously and contiguously day by day both in both in the seriousness of the crimes and the chronological numerical sequence. crime, and in number. This has led to In fact, the issue of youth crime in Canada has led to a growing public concern due to the realization that the number of youth crime is increasing and becoming uncontrollable getting out of control by the youth justice system, with the result that many people are demanding therefore calling for greater penalties and the imposition of more stringent harsher policies to deal with youth crime.
This paper considers Tthe degree and the extent in which members of the public feel about...
References: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. (2004). The Justice data fact finder. Juristat 17(13). Blanchfield, M. (1994, December 24). 'Ignorance ' behind push for action on teen Crime Youth advocates want. Ottawa Citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carrington, P. (2003). Has violent youth crime increased? Comment on Conrado and Markwart. Canadian Journal of Criminology. Published by Willan Publishing.
Collins, R. (2003). Youth crime feared. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Crawford, T. (2005). Crime erupting in classrooms. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth / Thomson Learning. New York: McGraw Publishers.
Fulton, E., & Fisher, L. (2005). The young offenders. New York: Aldine de Gruyter Publishers.
Gates, R. (2004). Youth crime: are jails and work camps the solution? Ottawa: Solicitor General.
John Howard Society of Ontario. (2006). Youth crime and our response: An update. New York: McGraw Publishers.
McDonald, M. (2003). The perception gap: Despite what crime experts say demands for harsher penalties are growing louder. Ottawa: Justice Canada Press.
Owen P. (2004). The downside of zero tolerance: Ontario locks up more kids than any other province; it doesn’t seem to be helping. Willan Publishing.
Sprott, J. (2004). Understanding public views of youth crime and the youth justice system. Canadian Journal of Criminology.Ottawa: Justice Canada Press.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document