Preview

Meat vs. Vegan

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
754 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Meat vs. Vegan
Critical Analysis on “Is it Possible to Be a Conscientious Meat Eater”
Sunaura and Andrew Taylor’s “Is It Possible to Be a Conscientious Meat Eater?” is an informative essay about the dirty side of the meat industry. They speak out of the physical abuse and poor living conditions endured by animals raised solely for the purpose of consumption. Because of the inhumane treatment towards animals, Taylor talks about a vegan solution and the many benefits associated with it. Animal cruelty is a sensitive topic that readers can easily be persuaded to either side. But, for the purpose of this essay, the reader can be swayed towards being a conscientious consumer. As mentioned already, animal rights and veganism will be discussed. It's hard to imagine when drinking a glass of milk or frying some eggs that animals are enduring harsh treatment in the process of getting such products. Taylor makes a valid point when she says “It is impossible to produce eggs and milk without vast amounts of killing” (203, par 3). The author believes that even though animals used for their byproducts are not being slaughtered, they are still being treated inhumanely because of their poor living conditions which lead to many unnecessary deaths. Such living conditions include chickens being tightly compacted with no room to walk and a lack of sunlight and fresh air. According to Taylor, this falls under animal cruelty. By informing the reader of a different manner of animal cruelty, Taylor is able to convince an audience to rethink buying from farms that are inhumane. When talking about “equality”, usually it is in reference to people of race, color, creed etc. Not many people include animals to that equation. Taylor says “Some people argue that equality should only include human beings, for no other reason than for the fact they are human” (202, par 3). Taylor accepts as truth that both animals and humans have much of the same “physiological” and “neurochemical” make up. Even though



Cited: Taylor, Sunaura. Andrew Taylor. “Is it Possible to be a Conscientious Meat Eater?” Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed.Sylvan Barnet & Hugo Bedau. 9th ed.Boston: Bedford/St Martin’s, 2011. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Today’s world is filled with media that aims to influence its viewers. However, not all media is true. Websites and articles try to persuade their viewers that being vegan is what consumers need to do to end animal cruelty. One such article that discusses this matter is Animal, Vegetable, Miserable by Gary Steiner. Steiner claims that meat eaters are self-righteous and commit mass murder against animals (846). However, several articles have proven that Steiner’s claims are false. These articles include: Defense of Eating Meat by Timothy Hsiao, Vegetarian Diets and Bone Status by Katherine Tucker, and Animal Protein Good for Health by Amanda Radke. In addition, the movie Temple Grandin portrays that feedlots have improved the treatment of cattle…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Saxena M., 2011, ‘The Vegetarian Imperative’, The Johns Hopkins University Press, United States, pp: 31-64.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kristof supports his claim by demonstrating the “public outrage”(2) from a “frightened dog in Orlando”(22) compared to the “far worse treatment of billions of chickens” (4), by illustrating the insensitive treatment of chickens including “antibiotic overuse”(20), “grim”(16) conditions consisting of hens “crowded into tiny cages” (16), and results of a “grotesque disease called gangrenous dermatitis” (7) that “‘rots’”(8) innocent chickens and transforms them “‘to mush’” (8), which could have a negative effect on humans who consume the chickens, and finally the author explains how the farmers are “threatened if they protest” (11) because the large, greedy companies take advantage of the authority they obtain causing the farmers to have “no control…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daniel Engster begins his argument in the “Care Ethics, Factory Farms, and Moral Vegetarianism” section of his article by claiming that we have a responsibility to care for the animals we make dependent upon us. He continues to explain the deplorable conditions of factory farms and that the animals raised for meat are not properly cared for. Engster gives responsibility to not only the workers and overseers of factory farms, but…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Purpose: The purpose of the argumentative essay is to inform Americans about the benefits of both diets and the treatment of animals for human consumption while arguing that a vegan/vegetarian diet is healthier for American’s westernized-diets.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals are constantly being slaughtered for our own selfish eating habits, today people are more worried about their social media fame then what they’re putting into their bodies and the process that it takes to get to our plates. An author Nicholas Kristof, wrote “Animal Cruelty Or The Price Of Dinner?,” published in 2016 in the New York Times, and he argues that while the public are raising a riot about a dog getting abused by his owner, while millions of baby chickens are getting slaughtered everyday for our food and no one seems to care. Kristof starts building his credibility with reputable sources and personal facts, citing from his own research and conventional facts, and successfully discussing his own emotional appeals; however, his attempts to appeal to the readers’ emotions weaken his credibility and ultimately, his argument.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Eating Meat

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Norcross explains the moral dilemma placed upon consumers who are aware of the inhumane practices of factory farms. Norcross concludes, through the analogy of Fred, that consuming factory-farmed meat is morally unjustifiable. I, however, do not believe that loving treatment of animals should be enough moral compensation to justify the unnecessary killing of an animal. Say for instance you own a pet cat and lovingly raise it with care and compassion, giving it ample room to grow and play. A few years later when the cat is fully grown, you decide to humanely put it down for the enjoyment of eating. This scenario is morally identical to the killing and consumption of humanely raised farm animals. In both cases you are prematurely ending the life of an animal to satisfy your pleasure of consuming meat.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People should be treated equally because it is wrong to make them suffer. Plain and simple yes? So why shouldn't we treat animals equally? Do you think that we should treat animals differently because they have different genes and look different to us? The interests of animals should be treated the same as the interests of humans. The interests of the animals that we eat not suffering and dying, is much greater than our interests in eating them. Some may think that eating meat is part of the food chain, that it is part of nature. It is, but there are a number of bad things in nature; disease, war etc. Just because it exists in nature does not make it a good thing.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writer had a conversation with the author of the book “Eating Animals” Jonathan Safran Foer,who is a vegetarian. As a vegetarian, Jonathan does not call on all human beings to stop eating meat since there are farms that animals are being treated well there. However, Jonathan still chooses to be a vegetarian due to the reason that endorsing the exception is to endure the rule. There are no excuses for eating meat. What he wishes is that people can consider this issue from a humane perspective, which means that we should treat it morally. According to his narration of the factory farming, it reveals how cruel the process of producing is. And for the argument which people think that Jonathan puts his entire life to worry about a chicken…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major arguments within today’s food dilemma, is whether or not it is ethical for us humans to consume meat. The issue rises from the mistreatment of farm animals in horrible conditions to the horrific slaughter. Several people such as Singer are arguing that in order to solve this issue we must stop the consumption of meat and animal products. However many other people believe that animal consumption is natural and it is what makes us human. In the following, I will challenge Singer’s view of which we should stop animal consumption by arguing that to stop eating meat is morally unacceptable and impractical for humans.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relevant: To prevent obesity and to save animals from dying and becoming our meals for dinner.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    vegan vs vegetarian

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been out with family or friends and have had to respond to this statement: “You eat eggs and cheese? I thought you were a vegetarian!” Of course, that results in a long discussion about the differences between a standard vegetarian and a strict vegan diet. But, I can see the confusion for people that do not follow a meat-free diet. After all, there are many similarities between vegans and vegetarians. In fact, these similarities far outweigh the diet differences. Health benefits and motivations for vegan and vegetarian diets are very similar, with only minor differences in eating habits distinguishing the two.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Food Inc Research Paper

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As meat products become increasingly available to the American general public, many people are questioning if it’s ethical to harvest animals for meat consumption. For a long time, this has been a debatable topic. Many animal advocates claim that mass production of meat has become a cruel practice to slaughter many domesticated animals under harsh conditions. As a result, people on the right side of the spectrum promote vegetarianism as a way to protect livestock from being mass slaughtered. Even though it can’t be denied that meat production overtime has become harsh toward livestock, eating meat is ethical because humans need it as an essential food source to live. However, under the circumstance that the livestock live joyful and free lives…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vegetarian vs. Meat Eaters

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “A vegetarian is a person who eats no meat, fish, or poultry and no by products from those sources” (Havala) such as chicken broth. There are many different forms of vegetarians “Lacto Ovo vegetarian excluded meat, fish, & poultry but includes dairy products and eggs. Lacto vegetarian eats no meat, fish, and poultry, but does include dairy products and eggs to some extent in the diet. A vegan is someone who eats no meat, fish, poultry, eggs, or dairy products and who also avoids the use of other animal products, including wool, silk, leather, and any nonfood items made with animal by-products. A semi-vegetarian is someone who is cutting back on meat in general. A Pollo vegetarian avoids red meat and fish but eats chicken. A Pesco Pollo vegetarian avoids red meat but eats chicken and fish” (Havala). Humans are omnivore; our bodies are equipped to consume both meat and vegetables. We have teeth that are designed to cut into flesh, however we don’t’ need a diet with meat to function on a daily basis. My paper will be on a vegetarian who eats no meat, fish, poultry or by-products. Vegetarians who have well-planned diets meet the same dietary recommendations for the same essential nutrients as meat eaters do. A Vegetarian diet also has many health benefits to the human body.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many vegans (including Gary Steiner) feel that buying meat, even humanely treated or free-range meat, is morally wrong. Gary Steiner goes on to say, “Chickens may be labeled free-range even if they’ve never been outside or seen a speck of daylight in their entire lives” (196). In other words, even if meats are labeled free-range, that doesn’t mean they treated humanely. He goes on to say, “Even if it is raised “free range”, it still lives a life of pain and confinement that ends with the butcher’s knife” (196). With this knowledge, we must ask why consumers still buy these items. Steiner believes this is because of the soothing feeling their conscience receives when purchasing these falsely reassuring labels. When it comes to the welfare and respect of animal life, ignorance…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics