Preview

Meaning Of Machiavellianism And Contemporary US Foreign Politics

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2046 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Meaning Of Machiavellianism And Contemporary US Foreign Politics
Practical Meaning of Machiavellianism and
Contemporary US Foreign Politics
Zhiyuan Lu
Penn State University

Author Note
Zhiyuan Lu: Penn State University student. Major: Economics Minor: Business
Practical Meaning of Machiavellianism and Contemporary US Foreign Politics

Politics can involve a wide variety of ethical issues, ranging from making certain policies to accepting campaign financing. Today’s political environments are quite different from that of six century ago. However, Machiavelli’s ideas may still be useful in today’s political issues. In Machiavelli’s era, people can hardly imagine a country be founded like this. Obviously it is impossible to compare political ethics
…show more content…
He was the second chancery and the member of diplomatic council, which is responsible for negotiation and military affairs. The Prince is his conclusion of fourteen years of political career and diplomatic experience. Although people are criticizing him for being too brutal for centuries and even invented the word “Machiavellian” to describe expediency, deceit and cunning, however, his ideas are actually rational and practical in most cases. After reading the whole book, I think there are lots of experience we can learn from and put into practical use. I think the most successful application of his theory is applying it to the extreme while not showing Machiavellian to the public during the …show more content…
Due to good decision-making and daily management mechanism, US government totally avoided the probability of making highly flawed decisions like autocratic rulers. I believe all of the policies that the government made are meant to maintain the interest of US people, keep the stable of the US society or at least safeguard the interests of one’s own party. In a country like the US that put nation’s interest and human rights first, is not easy to embody ethics in foreign politics. In The Prince, Machiavelli (1988) discussed the importance of having a strong army in many chapters. Based on his time, he suggests that a prince should not depend on mercenary or auxiliary armies. The US not only needs mercenary and auxiliary armies but also has the strongest army in the world. According to the report made by SIPRI(Stockholm International Peace Research Institute) in 2011 the USA is responsible for 41 percent of the world total military expenditure. 712.7 billion dollars have been spent on US military in 2011, the figure is more than twice of the second country on the list (Shah,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing Hobbes,’ Sandel’s and Machiavelli’s viewpoints regarding which of Aristotle’s three main categories of knowledge is the most significant for establishing good political systems or making good political decisions, one must consider what each theorists considers to be a good political system and create a link between the two. The most important category of knowledge for establishing and making good political systems for Aristotle is practical knowledge, the purpose of politics is to produce good, virtuous citizens, the law promotes just actions, purpose of legislators is to establish good laws. The most important category of knowledge for Hobbes is scientific knowledge, the absolute sovereign represents the commonwealth of its citizens, the absolute sovereign must uphold their self preservation, and all laws…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte is a well known political leader of the modern world. His conquests into other European countries and his military knowledge make him the historical legend that he has come to be. He made himself emperor of France and ended the French Revolution. Bonaparte’s successes in France cause him to be revered as a great leader who exemplifies Niccolò Machiavelli’s beliefs regarding the leadership of a country. Machiavelli offers advice to political leaders in his novel, The Prince, which is proven relevant through Napoleon’s ability to be war-minded, feared, and a good leader.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli Paper

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If I were a prince during the time of Machiavelli, then his methods would be very useful because power was constantly being moved. If I wanted my power to last then I would want to be cunning and feared. His methods of being devious and deceiving are perfect for winning battles and maintaining a city.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Progressive Era also belongs to the age of American imperialism, where the US gained control of many oversea territories and interfered heavily with foreign politics. Progressive presidents employed three different ways to handle foreign politics: Roosevelt employed the aggressive “big stick” diplomacy foreign policy; Taft focused on economic growth with “dollar diplomacy”; while Wilson followed the Monroe Doctrine and intervened in Latin America with “moral diplomacy”.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading this story, it shower me why it was so important. The Prince was written by Machiavelli who also wrote “The Art of War”. There is a lot of controversy on what the story’s true meaning was. It is described as a story on how to rule successfully but some disagree and say that it really means how “not” to rule. This story is broken up into different sections.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Prince was written by Niccolò Machiavelli while he was in exile. In his efforts to return to politics, Machiavelli wrote the Prince in order to exert the true nature of a successful leader, and once again be in the good graces of the Medici’s who were rising to power in Italy. The Prince reveals what Machiavelli views to be a successful leader. The Prince also reveals how Machiavelli views the nature of humans and how that effects how a dictator/leader should rule. Machiavelli believes human beings are selfish, greedy, easily manipulated, and incapable of self-governing as it often ends in their own demise. “[F]or men change their rulers willingly, hoping to better themselves, and this hope induces them to take up arms against him who rules: wherein they are deceived, because they afterwards find by experience they have gone from bad to worse” (Machiavelli 201). Human selfishness inhibits the individual’s ability to make rational long-term decisions thus deeming them incapable of self-governing. If given the people the right to make their own decisions, their greed ill cloud their judgment and cause them to make decisions that may not be in their best interest. If the society is not capable of self-governing they will need a strong leader and Machiavelli has the recipe for the perfect…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The military budget in our country has skyrocketed, and for what? Those opposing the argument say that defense is needed to ensure freedom, but defense should not be pre-emptive war. These types of actions have sparked "a series of diplomatic and political problems" with both friend and foes (Goodman 10). In addition to problems, spending has risen with "$5 billion a month" in a vain effort to defend freedom (Goodman 10). Even though it is apparent that the U.S. is constantly trying to nation-build, it remains in denial of being an empire. America doesn't identify that there are responsibilities when building nations. The fact that there is not "adequate cooperation and support" from those it supposedly helps further proves the nations stance as an empire (Ferguson). The steps taken toward building other nations should be "internationalized under civilian […] control" and not militarily (Goodman 9). Especially with freedom in mind, war should be that last form of action on America's list. "Intelligence and law enforcement" should be the first steps used in the battle against terror (Goodman 10). Such steps have previously been witnessed to work more effectively than military force. Additionally, "international diplomacy" could be another action used before military forces to manage crises throughout the world (Goodman…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Morality In The Odyssey

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The view of the separation of ethics from morality is more explicitly associated with Machiavelli, the Italian thinker. He not only insists on this dichotomy but also recommends, in his concise and famous thesis named, The Prince, to the ruler or prince to trample upon every ethical consideration so as to fortify his…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince is said to be a classic of the early Renaissance period that addresses politics of Machiavelli's time. Even though Machiavelli's approach is controversial, but it also very plausible when applied to modern politics or situation. Machiavelli meant for this to be a guidebook for future leaders based off of past leaderships. For example, the section about Cesare Borgia addresses how resilience is a good quality for a leader to keep power. Borgia was not able to keep power because he relied heavily on his father, Pope Alexander VI. Other than that, this story focuses a lot on the idea of morals and ethics. People based all of their decisions on morals and ethics. A reason that may or may not be accurate is that classical literature would sometimes influence public figures. In that case, something like the Prince is ideal for leaders who want to know how to keep power and be feared while in the best interest of his…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 2 ]. Walker, J. Samuel. Prompt & Utter Destruction, The University of North Carolina Press. 1997,2004. Pg. 38…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays