Preview

Mcculloch V. Maryland

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mcculloch V. Maryland
In many ways, the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of the federal government. The issue involved, the power of Congress to charter a bank, seems insignificant, but the larger questions go to the very heart of constitutional interpretation, and are still debated today. In 1791, as part of his financial plan, Secretary of the Treasury Alexander
Hamilton proposed that Congress charter a Bank of the United States, to serve as a central bank for the country. Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson opposed the notion, on the grounds that the Constitution did not specifically give
Congress such a power, and that under a limited government, Congress had no powers other than those explicitly given to it. Hamilton responded by arguing that Congress had all powers except those specifically denied to it in the
Constitution, and that moreover, the "necessary and proper" clause of Article I required a broad reading of the designated powers. President Washington backed Hamilton, and the bank was given a twenty-year charter. The charter expired in 1811, and the Jeffersonians had not renewed it. Then came the War of 1812, and President Madison realized that the government needed the services of a central bank. In 1816, at his recommendation, Congress chartered a second Bank of the United States
(BUS), which quickly established branches throughout the Union. Many local, state-chartered banks, eager to follow speculative policies, resented the cautious fiscal policy of the BUS, and looked to state legislatures to restrict the
BUS operations. Maryland imposed a tax on the bank's operations, and when
James McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the BUS, refused to pay the tax, the issue went to Court. Few people expected the Court to hold the charter establishing the bank unconstitutional; what was at issue was the extent of state power and federal authority. In what has justly been termed a state paper, Chief

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    9. In 1816, Congress created their 2nd Bank of the United States, but at that time there were 246 state-chartered banks with tens of thousands of stockholders and $68 million in banknotes and circulation. Yet many of the banks were inadequate and shady.…

    • 4712 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -shotguns and rifles could be owned but only if weapons were registered, kept unloaded and dissembled or restricted trigger locks.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cruzan V. Missouri

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Twenty-five years old, Nancy Cruzan, was in an automobile accident on January 11, 1983. She was driving an old car, which lacked seat belts. Massive injuries resulted in her falling into an unconscious state, unresponsive to outside stimulation. Doctors estimated that Nancy’s brain had been without oxygen for at least fourteen minutes before she was found. A person who goes without oxygen for more than six minutes suffers brain damage that is beyond repair. She was placed on life-support equipment and was fed intravenously. After emerging from a three-week long coma, Nancy remained in a “persistent vegetative state,” a condition in which an unconscious person displays motor reflexes but exhibits no indications of significant cognitive function.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case District of Columbia ( DC ) vs Heller an officer for DC got declined for the permit to have a gun in his home for the year. After this he decided that this was unfair and took it to court. He pointed out that he was a police officer and he carries a firearm with him at all times for the protection of others and himself, but the court denied him the right to have a firearm for the protection of him and his family. The constitutional issue with this case is the fact that it’s how DC wanted gun owners to break down their guns, have a trigger lock on it, and keep the ammo away from the firearm even though the gun is broken down without the trigger lock.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drawing Conclusions Supreme Court cases inevitably end with a decision from the Court. Describe the three types of opinions that can be written as part of that…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson Under the executive branch of the new constitution, Thomas Jefferson was the Secretary of State. When Alexander Hamilton wanted to create a new national bank, Jefferson adamantly spoke against it. He felt it would violate states rights by causing a huge competitor for the state banks, then causing a federal monopoly. Jefferson's argument was that since the Constitution did not say Congress could create a bank they should not be given that power. This is the philosophy of strict construction. Thomas Jefferson's beliefs led to the creation of the political party, Democratic Republicans. They believed in an extremely weak central government, no special privileges for special classes, especially manufacturers, and did not believe in letting every white male the ability to vote, only those intelligent enough to make wise decisions.…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Buchanan V. Warley

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This case was the first to be brought to Supreme Court by the newly organized civil rights organization, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Moorfield Storey argued the case for Buchanan. This case was of course odd. Buchanan, a white man, was suing Warley, a black, to force him to buy a house in a mainly…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ARA does not violate the constitution because it is content and viewpoint neutral. It is content and viewpoint neutral because it does not restrict speech. The ARA was passed to stop unwelcome communications that stop others from practicing their own rights. The ARA never mentioned that a person could not voice their opinions, only that they can not impose their ideas or make another person go along with their ideas.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcculloch Vs Maryland

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The decisions made in McCulloch v. Maryland recognized and explained to the United States the nation’s need for a strong central government. After fighting in the War of 1812, the United States of America experienced a significant amount of disarray and difficulty without a bank to supervise the country’s finances and to provide a reliable institution that the population could depend on amidst all the chaos. Alexander Hamilton’s idea of a national bank would serve the purpose of providing one common institution that could help the entire country through its difficult times, but first the federal government needed to exercise supreme power over the state governments in order to ever possibly complete that task. While the federal government and…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miller v. California

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today in our criminal justice system there exists a policy known as “The Miller Test”. The purpose of this test is to determine whether or not a given substance is obscene or not. It is a test that is frequently used today by police, and its significance is clearly obvious. The “Miller Test” is a direct result from the outcome of the U.S Supreme Court decision, Miller v. California. In this case, a local business owner who specialized in adult content and pornography, decided to market his business by mailing pornographic sampling material around the neighborhood. An unwilling recipient was mailed the graphic material and immediately contacted the authorities, whom later took Miller into custody. Miller was brought to court and charged under the California penal code which stated that:…

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In analyzing the views of the Marbury vs. Madison case one can tell that after analyzing the documents that the case resulted in puzzlement of Article III Section 2 of the Constitution. In the year of 1803 the Marbury vs. Madison case raised the question of if the Supreme Court should have the authority to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Yes, the Supreme Court should have the authority to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. According to Article III Section 2 of the constitution, The Supreme Court is deemed the right to scrutinize a law established by Congress if it is deemed unconstitutional as document F supports. When applying this statement to the case, the conflict originated from whether the Supreme Court was able to deem Marbury’s wish constitutional or unconstitutional. Marbury’s argument in this case was that he was obligated to his position as justice of peace because the President nominated him and the Senate confirmed his commission. This is true, Marbury was entitled to his appointment as justice of peace, but the Supreme Court was not the place where Marbury was able to get relief for his request. Since the Supreme Court has the right to reject a law that does not agree with the Constitution, the nation’s highest law, the act is invalid. This supports the claim made by Hamilton in Document B. As Hamilton implied, this strips the judicial branch of its power and gives more power to the other branches and the Supreme Court. On the whole this weakens the judicial branch and allows it to become the “least dangerous branch”. In conclusion Marbury was entitled to his position and the evidence supported his claim. But due to the fact that the Supreme Court was deemed the power, like stated in Document J, to state that the law being used as his verification was unconstitutional, Marbury and others appointed to government post where in lack of their Justice.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court analyzed the meaning and extent of the Second Amendment for the first time since 1939. In narrow 5-4 decision penned by Justice that the District of Columbia’s ban on handgun was unconstitutional and thus violates the individual right granted by the Second Amendment. The Justices of the Supreme Court interpreted the Second Amendment as the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, having nothing to do with collective right grant by the service in a state militia. The Court made clear that this right to bear arms has limits, but, as explored in detailed below, the statue of limitations of those limitation remain unclear. D.C.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mckeiver V. Pennsylvania

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case involved Joseph McKeiver, and Edward Terry, from two different charges. McKeiver was charged with robbery, larceny, and receiving stolen goods as acts of juvenile delinquency. Terry was charged with assault and battery on a police officer. The officer was breaking up a fight when Terry began hitting him with his fists and a stick. The next week, he was then charged and committed with assault on a teacher. Both juveniles were denied a jury trial, which they thought should be entitled by the U.S Constitution.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brown V. Louisiana

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the 1960’s, many African-Americans believed that civil rights should become a national priority. Young civil rights activists brought their cause to the national stage and demanded the federal government assist them and help resolve the issues that plagued them. Many of them challenged segregation in the South by protesting at stores and schools that practiced segregation. Despite the efforts of these groups and Supreme Court rulings that ordered the desegregation of buses and bus stations, violence and prejudice against African-Americans in the South continued (Meyer, F.S., 1968).…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson spoke out in the early 90's with a strict interpretation of the Constitution and his views on the bank. “To take a simple step beyond the boundaries... is to take possession of a boundless fiels of power” (Document A). It is evident that powers are delegated based on the Constitution and accepting those limits is the foundation of the United States. He believes the bank is not favored by the Constitution. Jefferson obviously had different opinions than Alexander Hamilton. In 1790, Jefferson wrote, “...Hamilton was not only a monarchist, but in support of a monarchy based upon corruption” (Document 1). That quote foreshadows their differences that would be clearly known in the future.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays