In class we watched United States of Secrets, which detailed the NSA’s controversial domestic spying program, as well as Edward Snowden’s decision to reveal classified information proving the program exists. In chapter 1 of our textbook, the philosophical theories of Kant, Mill, Locke, and others were discussed at length.…
The most recent exposure shows that the NSA is exploiting technology in order to spy and gather data on Americans, meaning that the NSA is no longer serving its primary purpose. Edward Snowden was shown to have leaked thousands of top-secret government documents to the media. In “Edward Snowden: The New Brand of Whistle-Blower?”, Kara Hackett describes this leak as “one of the most sensational leaks of classified information in U.S. history” (27). Of those documents leaked, one them destroyed the NSA’s credibility because it shows how the NSA has been secretly utilizing various forms of technology in order to spy on citizens of the U.S. It also shows how they have been forcing companies to hand over information without the essential and proper warrants.…
Nonetheless, the efficacy of surveillance has been called into question in recent years. Leaks by former National Security Agency analyst Edward Snowden prompted various studies by groups such as the New America Foundation to examine the impact of surveillance. The foundation concluded that of 225 indictments, kills or convictions for terrorism, only four were influenced by surveillance activities.…
According to the New York Times, President Obama loosened the US government’s surveillance rules last year (Keller et al.). While this may be true, our privacy is still being invaded because the government is still collecting information from us. More importantly, the government may change their surveillance rule in the near future again. Now we are happy that they loosen their surveillance rule, however, we cannot predict what will happen in the future. The changes in the government’s surveillance rules in the future may be too unreasonable that everyone opposes them. However it is too late because we cannot get our privacy back from the government…
citizens without consent after the Snowden leaks. In the memorandum, President Obama explains the needs and reasoning for the acquisition of data as a measure of national security, extending that need to common security with U.S. allies since with the advancement of technology new threats to national security are created such as cyber and telecommunication threats and the U.S, must be equipped to deal with these new threats. In the document, President Obama establishes a Review group as a supplement to the FISA and USA Patriot Act that will determine whether the U.S. should act on a situation, while following appropriate policies, such as public disclosure…
Edward Snowden was a hot topic in the news in 2013 after he released classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) to the media. This leak contained information about global surveillance performed by the United States, which involved monitoring email, tracking cell phones, and logging phone calls. Not only did this action force him into asylum overseas to avoid arrest, but it ultimately caused an uproar in the media and amongst the American public. The controversy surrounding Snowden involves the rights of the public vs. the surveillance programs performed by the U.S. While many condemn Snowden for betraying the national security of his country, many applaud him for exposing the…
Privacy is an important personal privilege that every individual wants to have. You don’t want others knowing everything about you or observing move. If you were told you were being watched this very moment, would your actions change? The government has surveillance on things us normal citizens wouldn’t even imagine. In 2013, a security technician of the Central Intelligence Agent (CIA), named Edward Snowden, gathered and leaked information on the United States government’s surveillance program("Edward Snowden."). Snowden was labeled as a “whistleblower”. This term means he revealed secret information to the public, because he felt it was their right to know(Merriam-Webster.com). Snowden leaked the information, because he felt it would safeguard privacy and liberty. He wanted the people to decide whether these programs are right for our privacy(Starr). His actions are controversial as some…
As a NSA contractor Snowden Edward Snowden’s expose was positive for all citizens of the United Sates because it allowed us access to injustices being committed by the same agency implemented to protect us. If the NSA and other government-regulated agencies, are committing crimes against the American people we should be aware. The Editorial Board claims that Internet companies are now reconfiguring their encryption in defense against hacking by government agencies. Perhaps this will result in a personal information being safer online. This leak may also discourage future unfounded surveillance. According to the article President Obama’s own panel “issued a powerful indictment of the agency’s invasion of…
The concept of living in a surveillance society with no fear as long as individuals have nothing to hide sounds ideal; but even if people are not guilty of committing a crime, there are a number of reasons why loss of privacy should concern them. A significant concern is that the…
Often, trust and privacy are grouped together (Macnish). Edward Snowden, former CIA contractor, exemplifies this relationship when he leaked documents revealing the mass and discrete surveillance by U.S. agencies. (“Edward Snowden”) The information he revealed raised concerns in the public, regarding the government’s lack of transparency. Many individuals became increasingly suspicious, questioning the government’s actions at “the discovery of increased surveillance, especially when [they] the surveilled party [considered themselves mostly] innocent,… [leading] to decreased levels of trust” (Macnish), in the government. The public responded defensively with the question: “Why should I trust you if you do not trust me?” (Macnish). Consequently, the response to the government’s unwarranted surveillance effectively demonstrates the relationship between privacy and trust (i.e. with increased privacy comes an increased level of trust. However, an intrusion of privacy results in decreased levels of trust.). Thus, by trivializing the citizen’s loyalty and confidence in their intentions and actions for the sake of increased surveillance and investigation, the government witnessed an angered public. The government damaged an important…
1.Would you have made the same decisions as President Bush to bypass the process of obtaining warrants for surveillance or President Obama to bypass the court system to target suspected terrorists? Why or why not? Does the consideration of the long-term effects on the expansion of presidential power impact your decision? Explain.…
In 2013, Edward Snowden, a former CIA analyst and contractor with Booz Allen Hamilton, copied and leaked hundreds of documents from the NSA, revealing its cooperation with various other countries to establish 100% surveillance across the globe. This secret alliance was known as the “Five Eyes.” Using a secret court known as a FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) court, the Five Eyes can obtain warrants to view every crevasse of somebody's digital footprint, without probable cause. This discovery sparked a barrage of empty promises from the Obama administration to discontinue such practices, as well as the civilians pushing for more transparency.…
Surveillance is presenting numerous challenges to our right to privacy. The National Security Agency or NSA is amassing private information about Americans. (Heuvel par. 3) Emails, phone calls and other forms of communication are being monitored. Unless we the American voters demand of our elected officials that they curtail the unwarranted surveillance by our government on American citizens, the current state of affairs is nothing but a prelude to our Government usurping our liberty of privacy we are likely to descend into a total surveillance state.…
The internet is being regulated more and more by governments, but is it a good thing?…
In the article “A Surveillance Society” by William E. Thompson and Joseph Hickey, the passage tells how surveillance technology had advanced and has flourished over the U.S, if the people should feel safe or paranoid, and how easy it is for someone to get one of these tools. First, there are many types of surveillance technology in the world some examples are night vison goggles, scanners, even our cellular devices could be used for surveillance. In the passage, paragraph 11 mentioned that cameras are becoming so small that we could expect bug scale drones flying into or out of anywhere making privacy close to impossible to have. A second point, our government after 9/11 set the Patriot so they can spy without the people’s consent so they can…