Preview

Masciantonio Case Note and Critique

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1100 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Masciantonio Case Note and Critique
Case Note & CritiqueMasciantonio v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 58
Case Note
Appellant: Mr. Giovanni MasciantonioRespondent: The Queen
Court & Year: High Court of Australia 1994 - 1995
Relevant Facts: Appeal from the Supreme Court of Victoria.
19 June 1991 Giovanni Masciantonio had a heated altercation with his son-in-law Maurizio Femia.
Altercation resulted in Mr. Femia’s life.
Fatal wound being a severed aorta (known as wound 5).
Giovanni Masciantonio was convicted of murder in the Supreme Court of Victoria.
O’Bryan J trial judge.
The defence argued provocation.
An appeal was put before the Court of Criminal Appeal Victoria.
Reason for the appeal was that the judge had failed to mention provocation to the jury regarding the second stage of the incident. That this failure was a miscarriage of justice.
Crockett, Marks & Ormiston JJ – Court of Criminal Appeal.
Crockett & Marks JJ agreed with the O’Bryan J decision.
Ormiston J believed that provocation should not have been a defence at all.
November 1994 appealed to High Court of Australia on special leave.
Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Gaudron and McHugh JJ.
Appellant put forward that considering the circumstances of the history between Masciantonio and his son-in-law that any ordinary person would have lacked self-control.
McHugh J put forward that the fatal wound could not be determined as to whether it was caused in the first instance or the second instance, and that the wording used by O’Bryan J was reflective of whether or not the jury found the Appellant had inflicted the fatal blow in the first or second instances and that if that the jury had in fact found that the appellant had inflicted the fatal blow in the first instance that provocation could not be a defence in the second instance.
McHugh J concluded that the appeal should be dismissed.
Brennan, Deane, Dawson and Gaudron JJ agreed together that given the evidence, that the Appellant may have still been lacking in



Bibliography: R v Lindsay [2014] SASCFC 56. Stingel v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 312. Graham Virgo (1994). Basics to Basics—Reconstructing Manslaughter. The Cambridge Law Journal, 53, pp 44-53. "Australia: New Laws to Simplify Jury Directions." MENA Report (Dec 14, 2012). <http://search.proquest.com/docview/1238344180?accountid=16285>. Bottomley, Stephen, Simon Bronitt, ‘Law in Context’ (The Federation Press, 4th ed, 2012).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1) In their Lordships' judgement the retailers are liable in contract of sale. The facts set out show negligence in manufacture. If excess sulphites were left in garment, that could only be because someone was at fault…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crippen Case

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Module two lab questions

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romeo phillion research

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Appeal refers to the appellant, sometimes called the plaintiff in error, must file a notice of appeal, along with the necessary documents, to commence appellate review. The person against whom the appeal is brought, the appellee, then files a brief in response to the appellant's allegations.(http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Appeal+(law) which means requesting a formal change to an official decision. In this case only one appeal had taken place.in 2009 Romeo Phillion sat through his first and last appeal. However, should this appeal even had taken place? The case was reopened in 2006, and in March 2009, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned his 1972 murder conviction and granted him a new trial, in part because a 1968 police report establishing a clear alibi for Phillion had not been turned over to his defence lawyer. (trial.http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/phillion/) due to the fact that Phillion was wrongfully accused he should not have even had an appeal.…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7.What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?…

    • 339 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case revealed significant deficiencies in those provisions and a marked inconsistency between their actual and intended operation. In particular, the case revealed:…

    • 1077 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The sentencing judge found that it was established beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent, after finding out that Flick was pregnant, that the course of terminating the offspring by any means in his power, either consensual or otherwise was going to be taken and was part of his thought process during the course of Flicks pregnancy up to the events on the 20th of August 2002. Mens Rea in this case concerning a guilty mind in regards to King has been proven by the actions that led to the assault. It has been stated before the court that King sought an abortion upon the beginning of the pregnancy, determining his disagreement towards the life of the child, and his outlook towards the future of the pregnancy, also being emphasised during his conversations involving Jessica Williams and Brianne McCarthy offering them a payment of $500.00 if they would ‘bash’ Flick as long as it resulted in the death of the baby. His honour concluded that this course of actions was evident in his previous actions, therefore proving a guilty mind.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Provocation was previously controlled under S2 of the homicide act 1957, the act stated where a person kills or is party to a killing of another, he shall not be convicted of murder if he was suffering from such abnormality of mind as substantially impaired his mental responsibility for his acts and omissions in doing or being a party to the killing. The new defence S54-56 Coroners and Justice Act 2009 replaced defence of Provocation S3 Homicide Act 1957; it came into force October 2010.…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensics

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. What other inconsistencies were found in the case when the evidence was re-examined? Why do you think these inconsistencies were ignored at the time of the Crippen trial?…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patting his chest for emphasis, he added, “I am extremely disappointed that the jury did not see the facts in this case. I will appeal this.”…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Issue No. 1: In the appeal you state Lt. J. Ratliff was your hearings officer and that he had prior knowledge regarding details of your offense. Response: Alternate hearings officer Lt. Ratliff would have had knowledge about your offense due to preparations for hearing of this infraction; which would deem this issue irrelevant.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Defence of Provocation

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Provocation is a defence which reduces the offence of murder to manslaughter. Even though there may be an intent to kill it can be deemed that, in some circumstances, it is not appropriate to be classified as murder. It is not saying the killing is justified or excused. What it is saying is that the circumstances, the response (which resulted in the killing) is within the normal range of behaviour of what can be expected of the ordinary person and that it represents an acknowledgement of human frailty. This is the traditional view of the law.[1] When the penalty for murder was death, often provocation was a way of reducing the punishment from the death penalty to life imprisonment. In jurisdictions where there was a mandatory life sentence, there was also an argument for this defence to be in existence. [2] In this paper, the issues of the relevant stakeholders, previous provocation cases, and the law will be discussed in regards to any amendments or recommendations that need to be made in changing the current law in regards to the defence of provocation and how it will affect the Queensland society and its stakeholders.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this appeal someone is actually asking their opponent to prove them wrong, so if they can’t they automatically are wrong. However, it is the job of the person actually purposing the argument to…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Universität Hamburg Fakultät Wirtschafts-­‐ und Sozialwissenschaften M.A. European Studies Right to Same-­‐Sex Marriage Under Article 8 ECHR Melek Günay Hamburg, 2013 Table of Contents 1.Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.Definition of ‘sexual minorities’ ............................................................................................. 5 3.The right of same-­‐sex marriage and the ECHR .................................................................. 6 4.Case Studies ................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1. Rees v UK ..............................................................................................................................................…

    • 7354 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Provocation Debate

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Provocation- common law, criminal defence * Either or both statutory or common law * Possible defence by excuse or exculpation alleging a sudden or temporary loss of control- in response to another’s provocative conduct to justify an acquittal, mitigated sentence or conviction of lesser charge * Can be relevant in a court’s assessment of a defendant’s mens rea, intention or state of mind at the time of the incident * In some cases in UK, Canada and several Australian states, the defence of provocation is available only against a charge of murder- and can reduce to manslaughter * Known as ‘voluntary manslaughter’ * In USA the Model Penal Code substitutes the broader standard of extreme emotional or mental distress for the comparatively narrower standard of provocation * Under USA Sentencing Guidelines for federal courts- ‘if the victim’s wrongful conduct contributed significantly to provoking the offence behaviour, the court may reduce the sentence below the guideline range the reflect the nature and circumstances of the offenceHistory- * Developed in English courts in 16th – 17th century * At that time a conviction of murder carried a death sentence- thus a lesser offence was needed * At the time it was seen as socially required for a man to respond with controlled violence if ‘his honour or dignity was insulted or threatened’ * It was then considered to be understandable that the violence might be excessive and end in murder * In the 19th century the idea of acceptable violence when insulted began to weaken * The circumstanced were changed to- while such responses may not be ideal, they were a normal reaction resulting from loss of self- control- and thus deserved mitigating circumstances * By the end of the 20th century and beginning of the 21st century the defence of provocation and when it should be applied has caused much controversy * Many put it down to anachronism-…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays