Preview

Mary Anne Warren Abortion Is Morally Permissible

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mary Anne Warren Abortion Is Morally Permissible
Mary Anne Warren argues the position that abortion is morally permissible because the fetus is not a person therefore has no rights therefore not immoral to be killed. I shall argue that Warren’s position is invalid since her argument “appears to justify not only abortion, but infanticide as well.”
From the time that Warren’s article “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion” was published she has gotten critiques that her argument “appears to justify not only abortion, but infanticide as well.”. Warren argues that if her argument is valid than infanticide is not a form of murder since you are not killing a person. Although, Warren states that there are other good reasons as to why infanticide would be unjust. An infant is not more of a person

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Take-home Assignment! 1.! a. Clearly state the formal reconstruction (i.e. premise 1, premise 2, and conclusion) of the Pope’s argument against abortion as it was presented in class. (1 point)!!…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of abortion is a highly controversial issue in today's society, and various views are held concerning the morality of the procedure. Some people feel that abortion is simply cold-blooded murder, because it is their opinion that a 'foetus' is a human being from the moment of conception. However, others would argue that a foetus is merely insubstantial matter, dependant entirely on its mother's body for survival, with no real life of its own. It is for this reason that pro-abortionists support the woman's choice to undergo abortion. After all, why should something so small and insignificant, which is not yet human, be entitled to the same rights and privileges a real human has"…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mary Anne Warren Thesis

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mary Anne Warren in the chapter “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion and Postscript on Infanticide” discusses her views on pro-abortion. Warren explains how a fetus has not reached enough development to be considered a person. In order for a being to be considered a person they must have a list of five traits. The first is “consciousness”, specifically the facility to feel emotions externally and internally, such as pain. The second is “reasoning”, the capability to finding solutions to any difficult insistences, or situations. “Self-motivated activity” is the third trait, it consists of “activity which is relatively independent of either genetic or direct external control” (pp). The fourth trait is communication, “by whatever means, messages with an indefinite variety of types, that is, not just with an indefinite number of possible contents, but on indefinitely many possible topics” (pp). The final trait is “self-awareness and self-concepts” (pp). These five traits are what ultimately identifies humanity or personhood, and a fetus does not apply to these descriptions, therefor, a fetus is not considered a person – rather the mother of the fetus is, she has the right to decide whether to terminate the fetus or not. “A pregnant…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are three main different views of the abortion debate. Most of the debate is if the fetus is considered a human or not is the main argument. For the pro-life side of the abortion debate, they mainly say that it should be considered human. Of course the pro-choice feel just the opposite usually. I personally, consider myself to be Pro-Life because I don’t think that we have enough information on the fetus and I could never consider killing a human (or even a fetus). I feel that the parents should have taken responsibility and taken the appropriate actions such as choosing abstinence, or at least using contraceptives. Hopefully, you will agree after looking at the opposition and their views/arguments against my view.…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marquis believes that abortion is “morally unjustified” (525). His argument is that “it is wrong to kill us because such killing deprives us of all the value of our futures” (525). He also argues that fetuses are close enough to being like us and that is it just as wrong to kill them as it is to kill us. The conclusion of his argument is that not all abortions are wrong since there may be other conditions in some cases such as “abortion before implantation, when the life of the woman is threatened by a pregnancy or abortion and abortion after rape”…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    298). If this position is accepted, abortion is morally permissible as fetuses do not satisfy the conditions for personhood and there is no loss of a future. However under this umbrella, infanticide, the act of killing an infant, is morally permissible as they do not meet the criteria to be considered a person and fetuses and infants are intertwined within the same category. Although the terms Warren has outlined is accepted, it can be agreed upon that infants do possess a valuable future (although they are not termed as persons). Infants have the potential to have experiences, enjoyment, achievement and other values that would have constituted a future and the same can be implied to fetuses. By claiming abortion is morally permissible, and since a fetus does not satisfy the terms of being a person, it is ultimately accepting that it is morally permissible to commit infanticide, as both agents are not persons. These actions rob both a future and a life if the liberal position is accepted. I will now provide a reason as to why the loss of future is not a loss of a life by analyzing the mother’s future (or lack…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to boldily autonomy and the clear distinction between a fetus and a rational, self-aware person, abortion is morally permissible practically whenever the mother chooses it, given it is done humanely. Most people would agree that in cases where the woman did not choose pregnancy, like rape, abortion should be morally permissible due to bodily autonomy and the immorality of asking someone to undergo psychological and physical trauma due to something beyond their control. This is supported by the Famous Violinist argument which explains that women, especially those who are pregnant due to rape, are not morally obligated to endure this immense sacrifice, even if it would be nice to do so (Singer, 1975, p.113-114). Whilst Thomson’s argument has fallen under criticism based on utilitarianism, these arguments are countered by Singer’s deconstruction of the Conservative Argument and its flawed perception that human life is inherently special, which demonstrates the moral permissibility of most abortions. The Conservative Argument’s premise that a fetus is an innocent human can mean two things: either the fetus is a person that has self-awareness and rational thought or a fetus is a member of the human species (Singer, 1975, p.117).…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While I am pro-choice like Warren, I do not agree with the entirety of her argument. Her qualifications for personhood exclude several groups from the moral community, such as infants and young toddlers. Through her reasoning, there would be just as little harm in killing an two year old child as in killing a three month old fetus. Therefore, I don’t think her qualifications to be included into the moral community are acceptable. I do agree with her point about a fetus’ potential rights, though- that they have some rights, but not full rights, and therefore the woman’s right to her own body override…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the human race develops over time, improvements in medical technology have allowed abortion to become readily available to women across the developed world. In Don Marquis’ essay, “Why Abortion Is Immoral,” Marquis believes that it is possible to argue that even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is morally impermissible. According to Marquis, abortion is morally wrong because the process of abortion kills a being with a right to life and a “future like ours”. Despite this view however, it is possible to reject Marquis’ account of the wrongfulness of killing, because his argument focuses on the “future like ours” statement, and this is not applicable to every situation. Through potentiality, a fetus’ lack of awareness, and the lack…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marquis, Don. "Why Abortion Is Immoral." Journal of Philosophy 86 (1989): 183-202. Print. This journal is written by a philospher by the name of Don Marquis. While this document is quit outdated it still plays an important role in today 's debate about abortion. It is used by pro-life activists when debating the reasons why they feel abortion is immoral. This journal is long and filled with great ideas to ponder about life, its meaning and signifigance to the world. Marquis has etched his name with this written journal in the never ending debate of wether abortion is right or wrong. I think this piece will be valuable to my essay in that it will give my audience a deeper perception than the current idea that abortion should be a womens choice.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abortion: A Woman's Right

    • 4396 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Sumner begins his article with an explanation of the interconnectivity between the moral status of the fetus and the moral status of abortion--that is, whether abortion is morally permissible or not. He argues that since allotting moral standing to a being affects the rights that we give to it, we cannot understand the morality or immorality of abortion without first determining whether or not the fetus has moral standing (Sumner 1992, p. 33). As a result, Sumner attempts to determine if and when the fetus has moral standing and the conditions that will determine this. Before he dives into this endeavour however, he first outlines the "established" views on abortion, including how they are similar, how they are different, and ultimately, why they are both flawed.…

    • 4396 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mary Anne Warren in On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion stated the characteristics which are central to the concept of personhood which are “sentience, emotionality, reason, the capacity to communicate, self awareness, and moral agency” (Cahn 193). In Warren’s requirements, adults are placed in the “persons” category. On the other hand, fetuses are not “persons” since fetuses do not abide to Warren’s characteristics. Fetuses therefore do not have the right to life. When a person has a “right,” it indicates that the person is justified to do something. For example in a legal stance, every United States citizen has the right to vote. Therefore no one can prevent a United States citizen from voting, since the citizen is justified to vote according to United States law. In a moral stance, since an adult has a right to life and not a fetus, my mother, technically if ever placed in a situation for choosing between my mother and a fetus, deserves to live not the fetus. In addition, a “fetus” is the zygote formed upon conception. The zygote is not a person. Even though the zygote will become an adult, at this point the zygote has no rights since the zygote does not fulfill Warren’s requirements. Therefore, abortion i¬s justified since the fetus is not a “person.”…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Abortion is Murder!” I read that on a protester’s sign almost every day when I drive to school. The protesters are standing outside of a Planed Parenthood Clinic, where abortions are performed. Abortion is a hot-button issue in American politics and media. But are abortions permissible or impermissible?…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The State acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and, as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right”.[1]…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays