Preview

Marx's Concept of Exploitation with Reference to the Work of Wolff, Roemer, and Cohen

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx's Concept of Exploitation with Reference to the Work of Wolff, Roemer, and Cohen
Jessica gouws
HET Essay 3
-------------------------------------------------
Discuss Marx’s concept of exploitation with reference to the work of Wolff, Roemer and Cohen.
In the context of Marxian Economics exploitation refers to “the subjection of producers (the proletariat) to work for passive owners (bourgeoisie) for less compensation than is equivalent to the actual amount of work done”. (REF SOURCE 1) This essentially means that the producer puts in all the labour time and creates the goods only to have them sold by the capitalist at a profit. Thus the producer is not receiving the full compensation for work done. The exploitation done by the capitalist in the Marxist view is that means of production is passively owned by the capitalist to generate a profit. The marxist view of exploitation focuses on the “exploitation of an entire segment of class of society by another “ (REF SOURCE 1) . Karl Marx assumed in his works, Das Kapital, that there were purely competitive markets. He argued that with an increased sense of freedom in the market there came an increased power of capital and thus a higher level of exploitation.

This kind of exploitation is seen as being an inherent feature and key element of capitalism and free markets. In fact, in Das Kapital, Karl Marx typically assumed the existence of purely competitive markets. In general, it is argued that the greater the "freedom" of the market, the greater the power of capital, and the greater the scale of exploitation. The perceived problem is with the structural context in which free markets operate (detailed below). The proposed solution is the abolition of capitalism and its replacement by a better, non-exploitative, system of production and distribution (first socialism, and then, after a certain period of time, communism).
In the Marxist view, "normal" exploitation is based in three structural characteristics of capitalist society: 1. the ownership of the means of production by a small

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In aversion to the issues of capitalism concerning wage labor and abuse of the laborer by the employer, Karl Marx and Frederick Engles saw the ills of society in the convention of private property. In his own words, Marx said that communism could be summed up in one sentence, “abolition of private property” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). Marx saw private property in the industrial age as the “antagonism of capital and wage labor,” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). The positive results of industry only allowed the bourgeois to obtain more capital and hire more labor. Capital, therefore, is for the bourgeois a means to accumulate labor for the individual.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx determined that exploitation was an inherit part of the capitalist system, because of the class division between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx defined the bourgeoisie as those who, “own and control the businesses, factories, land and capital.” Additionally, the proletariat were the individuals who sold their labour to the wealthy. Due to the structural division between the rich and the poor, Marx believed there was a difference between law as it appears and law, as it is.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Manifesto of the Communist Party, written by Karl Marx, the author proclaims that the struggles of the poor are caused by the greedy rich members of society taking advantage of the lower class. At the time, there were many workers who were exploited by their employers due to the complete lack of labor laws. Marx’s knowledge of his audience helped him to create an argument that appealed to abused workers; and slowly eased them into his revolutionary ideas for overthrowing the upper class.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One basic tenet Karl Marx's defines in his famous Manifesto of the Communist Party is the distinguishing characteristics of two opposing social classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie also known as the “capitalist” are the ones who own the means of production. Because of their wealth, they also have the power to control pretty much everything. The proletariat known as the “workers” do not own nor have any control of the means of production but earn money from the bourgeoisie by providing their labor for very little money.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx describes the exploitation of the working classes/workers will always be in an inferior bargaining position to the owners when they contracting for wages and working conditions; the results are substance wages and brutal working conditions. “After labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly -- only then then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!” (Marx, “Critique of the Gotha Programme,” Section III, pg.3) Marx’s judgement on solely the proletariat being the oppressed and the bourgeois being the oppressors clouds the positive aspects of capitalism. The fact that one can have the potential to create upper development for oneself while benefiting others along the way is an outstanding idea. Marx misconstrues the idea of a capitalistic system, which is beneficial to both parties as being self-centered, when its actual intent is to keep everything in the workplace productive. I can agree that certain aspects of capitalism can affect those working at the ‘bottom of the chain’ per se, by limiting their ability to pursue leisurely activities when compared to those above them. Yet, there needs to be…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Inequality Exam

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. In what way can one argue that the bourgeoisie is a revolutionary class in more than one sense in Marx’s theory of classes?…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx’s model helps to explain the industrial capitalism by first generalizing history leading up to today’s current society as being created due to the history of class struggles. Rather than the more traditional complex hierarchy system, Marx describes society as being split into two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He described these two classes in terms of binary oppositions, with one class having the absolute power, and the other being oppressed by that power. The bourgeoisie class was said to be the oppressor, which Marx defined as the social class that owns the means of production and the employers of wage labor in a capitalist society. Marx views the class as emerging from the wealthy urban classes in pre and early capitalist societies. They resulted when the demand for a larger scale and efficient means of production led to the division of labor and the arrival of industrialization. The proletariat class was said to be the class which was being oppressed by the bourgeoisie class. According to Marx they were the workforce of bourgeois enterprise and were a class of laborers which were able to make a living only as long as they…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx Response Paper

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Karl Marx, wages are a representation of one’s potential value of labor, however company owners necessarily get more money from one’s labor than an individual is paid in wages, for wages are based upon what is considered the minimal amount of money needed to sustain a worker’s life. This makes it a structural necessity in capitalism to feel as though we are paid less than the amount of work we put in. Given the author’s arguments, going through a retraining program in order to find a fulfilling career goes with Marx’s claim that we sell our labor for a wage in order to live, but he does not take into consideration the satisfaction received in a fulfilling career such as…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exploitation has been a major issue in many different workplaces such as the manufacturing industries and this essay highlights the importance of Karl’s Marx’s theory on exploitation in the nineteenth century. This essay will define and discuss the concept of alienation with a view of whether it still exists. It will explore if there is still class struggle in todays world in terms of working class and the upper class. The essay will also examine if exploitation is still around in today’s society and whether people still have to go to work in order to make a living and if it is still relevant at work. Finally a discussion of where exploitation applies in Britain and china will be included with some backed up evidence.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his study, Marx begins his argument describing a class’ struggles, or equally, the exploitation of one class by another, meaning the instance of one class becoming too powerful in comparison to the rest of society, is the driven force in which all historical developments are based upon. With this, Marx proposes the example of the Proletariat vs. the Bourgeoisie, the working class vs. the materialistic…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx developed a key theory called Marxism which is designed to promote the good in society. It is a response to modernity which is modern belief that societies can be transformed for the better. He argues for the working class and witnesses their exploitation. He defined the working class as individuals who sell their labour for wages. These people also do not own the means of production he believed that they were the reason for the wealth in society. He declared that the working class physically build buildings and bridges, craft furniture, grow food, and nurse children, but do not own land, or factories.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx begins this argument by explaining that this struggle of power and class has existed in society for ages and gives examples such as “Freeman and slave, patrician and plebian, lord and serf”. He then goes on into detail about the need for reform of class structure by stating “established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” This photo of the working class shows the view Marxism had on society that it was not balanced or fair for the Proletariat [working class].…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx, a political philosopher, who coined the term ‘Proletariat’, to describe the urban working class and ‘Bourgeoisie’ to describe the employers, saw the inequality of wealth between the two different classes of the industrial society as being unfair and immoral because the Bourgeoisie had all the wealth while the Proletariat who earned that wealth had nothing. This inequality, he believed, would breed hostility between the classes. He said that the Industrial Revolution had created the ‘Capitalist System’. A system, that protects the interest of the Bourgeoisie who…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics