Preview

Marx And Hobbes Similarities

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx And Hobbes Similarities
Born more than 100 years apart Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx were political thinkers from different time periods with different areas of emphasis that posed very provocative questions about society that we are still asking today. Both Rousseau and Marx did not agree with the classic liberal thinkers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. The majority of commonalities between Rousseau and Marx are in the fact that they refuted parts of Hobbes and Locke, that is where the comparisons between the two end also. The root of each man’s disagreement comes from a very different place and pose arguments that are centered on different ideas, Marx took issue with the liberal idea of an economic class system while Rousseau did not accept Hobbes’ or Locke’s take on the “state of nature”. …show more content…
One aspect of liberalism that both men saw as a source of inequality was property. Marx believed that the only way to achieve social equality was to remove private property “The right of man to private property is, therefore, the right to enjoy one's property and to dispose of it at one's discretion (a son gre), without regard to other men, independently of society, the right of self-interest. This individual liberty and its application form the basis of civil society. It makes every man see in other men not the realization of his own freedom, but the barrier to it.” (Marx, On the Jewish Question,1843,13). His belief that private property only creates envy and turns men against each other is illustrated in this quote from “On the Jewish Question”. Rousseau also believed that gross inequality came from private

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau's state of nature had no private property. Private property was something which arose from the stages leading up to the need for authority. Where Locke saw property as something which was naturally protected in the state of nature, Rousseau conceived of property –the result of greed, competition and vanity- as humanities reason for abandoning such a time and entering into the contract.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx was a German Philosopher who became famous and controversial for his works on capitalism, communism and dialectical historical materialism. A few of his famous writings were the Das Capital and the Communist Manifesto. These literature have been the guiding principles for the revolution in some countries such as Russia (McLellan, 1). On one hand, John Stuart Mill was a British Philosopher who became famous because of his works on liberty and utilitarianism. But…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau concludes that the progression of the sciences and arts are the cause of the corruption of virtue and morality. This discourse won Rousseau fame and recognition, and it laid much of the philosophical groundwork for a second, longer work, The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Rousseau’s praise of nature is a theme that continues throughout his writing career.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke and Rousseau both believed in a form of direct democracy, including freedom, equality, and independence. One of Locke’s important philosophies was that people are born with a blank slate, the “Tabula Rasa”, so everyone deserves political respect from birth, but with bad actions such privileges can go away. Rousseau pushed for a social contract to govern society, which took away rights but promised safety. Also, they both valued the human mind much more than past rulers, hence why they set up many ways for citizens to express their own ideas in their government. By including their philosophies in the Enlightenment age it helped push more countries in Europe to become a direct…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau developed a definition for the state of nature by using his knowledge of humans and animals, which he gathered from observations and experiences. He did not base his ideas of the state of nature on religious beliefs. Rather, he worked backwards; he used what he knew about contemporary man to guess how man was in the beginning (i.e. in the state of nature). Locke begins to explore the state of nature on the premise that the savage man had natural rights in the state of nature. Both philosophers followed the same train of thought: the state of nature, the development of property, the need for the social contract, the civil society that was created, and the governments that formed in those societies. They differ in that Rousseau believed that people left the state of nature when they discovered the benefits of relying on each other for resources. The idea of property caused labor to become necessary; this created a need for a social contract, which formed civil society. Since civil society formed on communal values, it should come before the individual. The individual does not sustain the social contract, the group of individuals does. In…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx and Engels are against private property and want to abolish the class system and the exploitation relationship between bourgeoisie and proletariat from the DL, and to achieve the ideal communist society that people have the idea of shared property. They believe the DL is what creates the division of people into social classes and is a result of the subordination of one over another through ownership. The DL, the class system, and the privatization of private property are abolished in a communist society that is the collective ownership of surplus, so the communism is the only way to achieve equality. People have freedom to do what they are pleased without forces from ruling class when the DL is abolished, which is an utopian ideal that…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society there is a class divide between the wealthiest one percent of the population and the poorer ninety-nine percent. Therefore, Marx believes this economic division is a result of the law reflecting the interests of the dominant class, rather than the general interests of…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau both have similar views on man's nature, authority and freedom. Those views are that all men are essentially equal and that each individual has the right to life, liberty, and property. They believe that these rights are given by God, and thus natural. They also believe that reason is a God-given and religious liberty, and right to freedom of speech. The differences are that Locke believed that when people gave up their rights they gave up there freedom to be safe. Rousseau believed that when people gave up their rights to the government they…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau describes the state of nature and the origin of chance events that gave birth to a civil state, where men build social relationships and developed reason. His description of state of nature is very different from that of Locke and Hobbes, as he believes that state of nature is actually better than the civil society. According to Rousseau, civil state is the culprit behind destroying the rudimentary man. It is surprising to note that Rousseau prefers state of nature over civil state, where savage humans live amicably. Rousseau indirectly criticizes Hobbes’ way of examining original man’s traits that developed because of living in a society. Through his thought experiment, Rousseau tries…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern political economic theory and philosophy can be greatly attributed to the works of two men who seemingly held polar opposite views on the subject. Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher, published his most well known work An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776 and is most often associated with the ideas and principles of the political economic system known as Capitalism. At the other end of the spectrum is Karl Marx; the German philosopher most often associated with Communism and the author (or co-author) of The Communist Manifesto. This paper seeks to discuss the core differences in their respective political economic philosophies with regards to what economic value is and what the role of government should be in their versions of political economy. This will conclude with the argument that while Smith's work had laid the foundation for modern economic philosophy, it was Marx who would ultimately leave the most significant impression upon the world with his revolutionary ideas.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes Vs Locke

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages

    In this paper, I will examine the political philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. I will investigate both men's ideas individually and offer my own views on their theories. I will conclude the paper by comparing and contrasting the notions introduced in their respective writings.…

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Locke Vs Karl Marx

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page

    John Locke and Karl Marx are two people who influenced our everyday lives immensely, yet have very conflicting ideas. In an attempt to change people's thinking about monarchical societies, John Locke conveys that individualism and limited political power are the best options, and explains that in his famous Two Treatises of Civil Government. Marx chooses to believe a quite different philosophy, about which is named Marxism. He explains these ideas, with the assistance of Fredrick Engels, in his Communist Manifesto. While both ideas are very present in modern society and governments, the system that is more reliable and consistent for running a government belongs to John Locke because of his beliefs for rights we are born with as humans and…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Rousseau people have more freedoms and live peacefully in the state of natural law. However, other philosophers such as Hobbes and Locke disagree with this view and see the civil society as more ideal. Rousseau is highly a libertarian because the advocates for a high degree of freedom and individual judgment which he sees as being present in the state of natural law.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays