Preview

Marrying for Love

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
654 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marrying for Love
“The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”
Today there are many different types of marriages that are widely recognized; however, monogamy and polygamy are most commonly accepted. While looking for marriage there are many reasons for someone to choose a desirable mate. Looks, personalities, fame, power, money and love are just a few of the things that people may search for when choosing who they want to marry. Many people today feel that love should be the primary factor in marriage, however “very rarely in history has love been seen as the main reason for getting married” (Coontz 378). The views toward different types of marriages from the 1600s all the way up until today are introduced in the article “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”. The author Stephanie Coontz explains and informs readers how some cultures and religions viewed love as a basis for marriage then and today.
Coontz’ article explains that as far back as the 1100s love was not present at the start of a marriage; it was either factored in or developed afterwards. In the thirteenth century, adultery was widely accepted as a form of love which is very different from today’s world. In the 1500s and 1600s, marriages were arranged by parents and if their “loyalty was not paramount…they were sometimes beaten” (Coontz 383). During the 1700s thru the late 1800s sexual loyalty was not even considered important; in fact many cultures have allowed mates to seek sexual gratification outside of marriage. It was not until recently in the late 1900s that people began to marry because of their love for each other. Coontz shows the comparisons of different cultures and their reasons to marry.
Coontz discusses that love is not a reason to marry. Although her argument is pretty accurate, today’s society would disagree with this. People may feel that love is the only thing that is strong enough to keep people together until they die. After people run out of money, fame, and lose their good looks due to natural or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout history marriage and love have meant different things to different cultures. Coontz states that “For most of history it was inconceivable that people would choose their mates on the basis of something as fragile and irrational as love… (378). Marriage was often seen as a tie between two families based on financial or political beliefs. It wasn’t until recent decades that love played a factor into marriage. Most cultures believed in male dominance, that the males feared that falling in love would give a woman an opportunity for equality. The author points out in the Chinese culture, the man could return his wife to her father if the couple shared too much affection. Both parties had duties to preform and if those were neglected it was looked down upon. The love for one’s spouse was not to exceed that of which was for the family, or God. The mistress was the one they were to be intimate with. In fact, it was common for the couple to explore intimacy outside the marriage openly. Political and economic motives have far outweighed many other rational ideas of marriage. The idea of love wouldn’t even factor into the decision making. The concubine filled the role for all emotional and sexual desires while the spouse’s position was to insure and continue social or financial success for her family. Survival of a society, from an individual family to an entire civilization was once the main goal. Forms of polygamy and co-parenting have been common…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coontz Summary

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Stephanie Coontz’s, “A Pop Quiz on Marriage; The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love”, Coontz shows us historically how marriage has changed tremendously and why it has changed. She gives an example how people once married for political reasons and necessity. Then she explains that now, people marry for love, togetherness, and sex. Before the modern era, marrying for love was frowned upon. People married each other because they were forced to by their parents. In some cases, if a man and a woman were in love, it was looked upon as a limitation to the importance as more valued objects, such as god or family.Some people even had multiple wives or husbands and there was no jealousy between them. Today, there would be a whole lot of problems if we lived our life with multiple spouses. In other cases, love was developed after marriage, but was not a necessity. In most cases today, love is a necessity for marriage. Why all of a sudden is there a change?…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Against Love”: immediately controversy is conveyed by the title of Laura Kipnis’ article on modern relationships. The reader is put on the defensive as Kipnis starts her argument with strong metaphors attacking one of the most basic human interactions that we see as natural and embrace without question. Namely, love, a word held in superposition between complex and simple. Kipnis argues it has been overrated and too much is sacrificed in the pursuit of making it last. Defining her own terms that apply to most relationships such as “advanced intimacy” and “mutuality” she provides a new perspective on old notions. Her tone throughout is consistently sarcastic but make no mistake, Kipnis is addressing a real issue on what we value as a society. Descriptive language is Kipnis’ fishing line that keeps you reading, often creating vivid and objectionable images that no one can avoid cringing at. Concepts surrounding love and the ideal couple change from age to age and from culture to culture but Kipnis doesn’t disregard this. She compares today’s norms to historical precedence as she identifies the shift from focusing on the convenience of financially organized marriages to the achievement of unending life-long love. Kipnis’ article presents a fascinating argument by proposing an idea…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last 40 years marriage rates have declined significantly while the number of couple’s cohabitating has risen rapidly. This is due to our changing society where equality, laws, social acceptance and religions have all contributed into the way we view marriage and relationships. In the 1970’s there were around 400,000 first marriages whereas, in 2011, there were 248,000. The average ages of people getting married have also increased from 25 for men and 23 for women in 1961 to 36 for men and 33 for women in 2011. Cohabitation is a big factor in the decreasing number of marriages with people using it as either an alternative to marriage entirely, or a ‘trial marriage’ which just delays the time of a couple’s marriage.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is defined as a legally recognized relationship between two people who intend to live together as sexual and domestic partners. Marriage has always seemed to coincide with “American Dream” and the pursuit of happiness. Although marriage continues to be a part large part of American life, that path is not for everyone. Marriage, as any other life-long commitment, can be very difficult even under the best of circumstances. Without the proper amount of persistence, maturity, and determination, a marriage simply can not survive successfully. Marriage certainly is not for everyone, especially with people that have certain social issues, people with commitment issues, and people with selflessness issues.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is an important aspect of our society and has been a recurring theme throughout the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stephanie Coontz’s essay on “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” shows her opinion that the expectations of marriage are unrealistic based on different societies around the world in different time periods. For example in George Bernard Shaw’s theory, he believed that married was “an institution that brings together two people under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive and most transient of passions” (qtd. I’m Coontz 378). In our history all of the world marriage has been said to be a tool of survival. Emotional love played a small part in marriage and was even sometimes discouraged. Even in today’s world love is still no seen as a necessity of marriage.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the fourteenth century marriages were done by arrangement. Marriages were arranged for social, economic and political reasons. Women were not allowed to choose who they wanted to marry. However, sometimes men were able to choose their bride. Marriage was not based on love. Husbands and wives were generally strangers until they first met. If love was involved at all it came after the couple had been married. Even if love did not develop through marriage, the couple generally developed a friendship of some sort. The arrangement of marriage was done by the children's parents. In the fourteenth century children were married at a young age. Girls were as young as 12 when they married, and boys as young as 17. The arrangement of the marriage was based on monetary worth. The family of the girl who was to be married gives a dowry, or donation, to the boy she is to marry. The dowry goes with her at the time of the marriage and stays with the boy forever. But today couples marry each other because they actually love one another. They don’t do it because they have to; they do it because they want to. Also, a girl’s parents doesn’t choose their husband for her they choose their own.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story “Federigo’s Falcon” by Giovanni Boccaccio evidence is shown that points to the change that was coming. In Boccaccio’s story a widow named Monna Giovanna was urged relentlessly by her brothers to remarry as she was wealthy and young. Nonetheless Monna stood her ground finally agreeing to remarry but only on her terms. This small action spoke volumes, though it was something that would most certainly not have happened at the time it illustrated the need for change and foreshadowed the coming of such change. Now, centuries later that change has made marriage a beautiful thing in 2016 people can marry just about whoever they want and actual love is at the center of it all and is now the main focus of this age old…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article” The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love “the author gives a global interpretation of what marrying for love means to different cultures. While Americans strive to focus on the love connection before marriage, the writer of the article Stephanie Coontz points out that other countries practice the total opposite. Although marriage is an institution that brings two people together, Coontz describes this as being “under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive and most transient of passions” and are required to feel excited about each other every day for the rest of their lives until death do them apart.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The way woman are perceived is constantly changing. In our culture there are so many aspects of the role woman portray. In the Book, “The Radical idea of marrying for Love” Coontz explores the many different cultures and how the way perceive marriage has changed. Their was a time when we looked at marriage as a need for survival to society and to our race, in some coutries marriage is still seen this way. Our culture today looks more upon the emotional aspect of marriage. Men and woman want a more sexually and emotionally fulfilling relationship. Coontz also looks at other cultures such as England that marry for station and the need to produce an heir to the throne. Is there truly a happily ever after? With Divorce on the rise and The expectations of your mother are not the same as for you. Taking care of your family has taken on a different set of challenges and obstacles, and with the addition of so many single mothers this has become the only honorable choice. Does this mean that one job is more important than the other? Housewives work, equally as hard as mothers who join the workforce; however, they do not receive the same respect as a mother with employment outside of an apron. Both positions have equally the same challenges and downfalls. The same author shows two different insights in this opposition, one in the defense of the housewife, the other written by a woman who gave up her life for her family and in return was left alone and uneducated with no means of taking care of herself. This would be the defense for woman in the workforce.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is the legal relationship between two people in eyes of law. Over the last 50 years or so, the patterns of marriage and divorce have changed significantly and are still changing in today’s society. This is due to many factors such as less stigma, changes in women’s positions, secularization ,cohabitation and many more.…

    • 730 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brown, Susan L. "Marriage." World Book. N. pag. World Book Student. Web. 12 Apr. 2013.…

    • 3362 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Marriage used to be strictly for the sake of reproducing and having good reputation in the social aspects of old communities, but maybe it should be more about love than that?…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Continue skimming by reading the first paragraph of each section (or part of the first…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics