Topics: Big Five personality traits, Leadership, Psychology Pages: 6 (1951 words) Published: February 28, 2013
Question 1: Understanding human behaviour is critical to organisations - discuss the benefits of self-evaluation/self-assessment as it relates to leaders today. Introduction
As more organisations become complex and competitive, human behaviour cannot be ignored. Leaders need to understand the strategic factors that influence human behaviour. Success of an organisation is largely based on understanding ‘the interface between the human behaviour, organisation and the organisation itself’ (Griffin 2010:4). Human Behaviour

Understanding ‘why... people behave the way they do’ Clawson (2001a) is a critical factor in predicting human behaviour. Human behaviour is not innate but is learnt, we are shaped by what we see and experience in our lives and the way we respond to circumstances. Research and study has shown that human behaviour is a function of ‘Personal Values, Assumptions, Beliefs and Expectations (VABEs) about the way the world should be’ Clawson (2001a). Thus, human behaviour is influenced by ‘VABEs’. Effective leadership becomes a process of understanding other people’s VABEs. As asserted by Clawson (2001a) leadership is influential ‘guessing is not managing...unless leaders understand why people behave the way they do their efforts to influence others’ ... [will be futile.] (Clawson, 2001a:1&22) According to Robbins, Judge, & Campbel (2010:84) understanding personalities in an organisation is very critical, he described personality as ‘the sum total of ways in which an individual reacts and interacts with others’. ‘Big Five personality model’ is an outburst of personality, a critical theory of predicting human behaviour and personality traits in relation to job performance. As an assessment tool for leaders it helps to identify five key personality dimensions: Extroversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotion Stability and Openness to Experience. Other personality attributes, Locus of Control, Machiavellianism, Self-Esteem, Self monitor and Risk Taking also contribute to human behaviour. Self Evaluation/Self-Assessment

As George (2007:2) asserted that, ‘the journey to authentic leadership begins with understanding the story of your life’. According to Clawson (2001a:7) ‘memes are the building blocks upon which we erect our behaviour’, unless leaders embrace the call to assess ourselves and to be self aware of our ‘memetic endowments’; We are not architects of own lives, much less the lives others: we are rather mere executors of blueprints of previous generations (Clawson 2001a:8) Self-awareness, an ‘insightfully processing of feedback about oneself’ (Dubrin2007:453) is a key construct of authentic leadership; in principle self-assessment results in self-awareness. The greater benefit coming from authentic leadership is the objectiveness of leaders in accepting their weakness and strength. Self-awareness as it relates to authenticity in leadership creates openness and encouragement that followers will be able to emulate. Through self-assessment, leaders can achieve their optimal balance without going through crucible circumstances. Quinn (2005) defined this as the ‘Fundamental State of Leadership’; he identified four transformative questions that are direct benefits of self-evaluation: * Am I Results Cantered? – ( willing to be called out of your comfort zone) * Am I Internally Directed? – ( Deciding on core values rather than succumbing to pressure) * Am I Other-Focused? – ( being a team player putting team goal first) * Am I Externally Open? – ( being adaptive)

Leaders could reach the state of fundamental leadership by answering these four questions. According to Quinn (2005), leaders possessing these four characteristics are likely to be influential and authentic. Contingency Theory- Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC): ‘an instrument that purports to measure whether a person is task- or relationship oriented’ (Fiedler, 1967) is arguably considered as an inflexible self-assessment tool,...

Bibliography: Questions 1 & 2
Clawson, J., 2001a
Clawson, J., 2001b. Leadership and Intelligence. pp. Darden Case No. UVA-OB-0652. Available at SSRN:
Clawson, J. & Bevan, G., 2000. Leadership Steps Assessment (LSA). UVA-OB-0733, p. Available at SSRN:
Clawson, J. & Smith, B., 1990. Prejudice in Organisations. UVA-OB-0831, pp. 1-17.
Dovidio, F. & Gaertner, L., 1999. Reducing Prejudice : Combating Intergroup Biases. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 8(4), pp. 101-105.
Dovidio, F., Glick, P. & Rudman, A., 2005. On The Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years After Allport. Oxford: Blackwell Publishsing.
Dovidio, F., Hewstone, P. & Esses, M., 2010. The Sage Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Descrimination. London: Sage Publication.
Dubrin, A., 2007. Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skill. OH: South Western.
Festinger, L., 1957. A Thery of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston , IL: Row Peterson.
Fiedler, F. E., 1967. A Theory of leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
George, W. S. A. M. M., 2007. Discover Your Authentic Leadership. Harvard Business Review, pp. 1-12.
Goleman, D., 1995. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Griffin RW, M., 2010. Organisational Behaviour: Managing People and Organisation. 10th ed. Mason, OH: South Western.
Harter, S., 2002. Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press..
Judge, T. A. et al., 1999. The Big Five Personality Traits, General Mental Ability, and Career Success Across the Life Span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), pp. 621-652.
Kumar, A. .. D., 2012. Organizational Behavior (Analysis). Economics, 47(3).
Quin, E., 2005. Moments of Greatness: Entering The Fundamental State of Leadership. Harvard Business Review, pp. 1-11.
Robbins, P., Judge, T. & Campbel, T., 2010. Organistaional Behaviour. 13th ed. London: Pearson Education.
Rollinson, D., 2008. Organisation Behaviour and Analysis. 4 ed. s.l.:Prentice Hall.
Ronald J. Burke, C. L. C., 2006. Inspiring Leaders. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Rudman, L., Ashmore, R. & Gary, M., 2001. Unlearning Automatic Biases:The Malleability of Implicit Prejudice and Stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, pp. 81,56-868.
Sritharan, R. & Gawronski, B., 2010. Changing Implicit and Explicit Prejudice. Social Psychology, 41(3), pp. 113-123.
Thomas, A. & Ely, J., 1996. Making Differences Matter. Harvard Business Review, pp. 1-14.
Woolfolk, A., 2008. Educational Pyschology. 10 ed. London: Boston Mass.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on The Marketing Process
  • Marketing Principle Individual Assignment Essay
  • Essay on Duracell Marketing Plan
  • Marketing Essay
  • Essay on marketing
  • Marketing Essay
  • Personality Does Not Matter to Marketing Practitioners: a Debate Essay
  • Consumer Behavior and the Four P's of Marketing Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free