Preview

Mario Echazabal V. Chevron US

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
159 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mario Echazabal V. Chevron US
Beginning in 1972, Mario Echazabal worked for freelance contractors at a refinery owned by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. once Echazabal applied for employment directly with Chevron, the company's physical examination discovered he had a liver condition, the cause known as hepatitis C. Chevron's doctors concluded that the condition would be exacerbated by more exposure to toxins at the industrial plant. In response to Chevron's request that the industrial plant transfer Echazabal to employment without exposure to toxins or fire him, the contractor employing him laid him off. Echazabal filed suit, claiming that Chevron's action violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). under an Equal Employment opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I enjoyed reading your post this week, too. I agree with your conclusion, especially “The District Court Judge in the Oiler vs. Winn Dixie case would have had to side with Oiler that he was unlawfully discriminated against and Winn Dixie would have most certainly had to pay Oiler for his monetary losses.” That is very important because both the court’s decision and Winnie-Dixie’s misconduct put Peter Oiler in a bad situation. But, Winnie-Dixie also had a bad reputation by firing Oiler. The company have understood later how they lost their good reputation. The LGBT law eased life for LGBTs.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi (Khajavi), an anesthesiologist, and defendant, Robert Del Pero, a surgeon, engaged in an altercation over the wisdom of proceeding with a particular surgery, defendant Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group (Feather River) terminated Khajavi’s employment. At trial, the court non-suited Khajavi’s claims that defendants Feather River and Robert Del Pero had discharged him, and conspired to discharge him, in violation of public policy -- that is, in retaliation for advocating “medically appropriate health care” in violation of Business and Professions Code section 2056.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There was over 600 pieces of evidence. Pink fibers were found on the bodies which matched to a bath rug found in the suspects home closet. By looking at both samples the FBI were able to note there were the same fibers connecting the suspect to the victims.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On September 3, 2002, a class action was launched in Toronto to against Loblaws alleging that customers and other persons may have been exposed to the Hepatitis A virus because of allegedly contaminated produce at Loblaws' Humbercrest store located at 3671 Dundas Street West in Toronto. This lawsuit relates to an employee of Loblaws infected with Hepatitis A. Although the identity of this employee was not disclosed, the fact was confirmed that this employee, who worked in the section of the store in which products were prepared, displayed and sold, has caused the infection to spread.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On February 9th, 2002, Jodie Scheier slipped and fell in Jersey Joe’s Sports Bar & Grill after leaving her seat at a booth upon being called to collect a door prize. Jodie claimed that there were two steps awkwardly positioned that led to the booth, which caused her fall and the subsequent injury of her right index finger. As a hairstylist, Jodie relies on the use of her hands and fingers, and was unable to work properly because of the injury. Jodie did not mention her fall to anyone working in the restaurant, and continued to order three more drinks after her slip. No one in the restaurant found out about the slip until “several weeks later” when it was mentioned to the manager by a third party. Many other patrons had stumbled on, but not fallen because of, the two steps that led up to the booths in the sports bar. A splint was placed on Ms. Scheier’s finger for approximately 6 weeks, and she returned to work as a hairdresser after 10 weeks. Upon returning to work, Ms. Scheier found it quite difficult to carry out routine tasks, and gave up her job after 4 months.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is an agency of the Federal Government created to handle all types of employment discrimination and to ensure that equal opportunity is given to employees. In the case of EEOC vs Waffle House, I was glad to see that the EEOC’s stepped in and file a suit against Waffle House for violating the ADA. I feel that it was very unfair that Baker was terminated due to he had a seizure at work, but I was happy to see that the EEOC trumped the arbitration at the end.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    LOZMAN v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA was a case brought upon the Supreme Court questioning what kind of floating structures fall under maritime jurisdiction. The Supreme Court’s ruling in this case was decided after an immense struggle of questions pertaining to an array of issues. These issues, among others, include the definition of the word “vessel” and the necessities needed for a watercraft to be practically capable of maritime transportation.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Harrison Jr. the plaintiff filed a complaint with the EEOC against the defendant Killeen Fast- Food Restaurant (Wendy’s) for refusal to hire him based on his hearing impairment despite his qualifications. The EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Waco Division, the general manager of the restaurant refused to hire…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case 8 H&P Gerald Edwards

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: This is a 53-year-old black individual a patient of Dr. Shelton, who has had diabetes for at least six months, but he thinks it has been longer than that. He says his last known blood sugar was in the 300’s. He presents in the ER today with a foot ulcer since January of this year. He stated that it started with blisters where he had soaked his feet too long in hot water. He has had no eye examination for two years. There has been no surveillance of chronic complications of diabetes.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles Baker sued Joe Carr because he explained that the legislature of Tennessee failed to represent urban citizens and overrepresented rural citizens. A law in Tennessee required every district to be redrawn every ten years, but Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901. Baker stated that Urban areas had grown in population and should be represented as equal as rural areas. He also said that urban areas failed to receive “equal protection of the laws” , required by the Fourteenth Amendment.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the People v. Caballero case, the 8th amendment was being denied when 16 year old Graham was served with “…a minimum of 110 years before becoming parole eligible” (People v. Caballero). Terrance Graham’s VIII amendment was violated, he was given a cruel and unusual punishment of a 110 year sentence, and only after that would he be eligible for parole. Graham was a 16 year old boy who was committed for armed burglary and attempted armed robbery, and was sentenced to probation. However, his probation was revoked and was sentenced to life in prison for burglary: “…leaving Graham with no possibility of release unless he was granted executive clemency” (PJDC). The number of given years is cruel because it falls out of a human’s natural life…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Garcetti V Ceballos

    • 2803 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Ceballos then brought a section 1983 claim in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, asserting that his supervisors violated the First Amendment by retaliating against him for his memo. His supervisors claimed that there was no retaliation, that the changes in his job were instead dictated by legitimate staffing concerns, and that regardless,…

    • 2803 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gonzales V Oregon

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A group of Oregon residents, including a doctor, a pharmacist, and several terminally ill patients, sued the United States Attorney General to challenge an interpretive ruling of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The rule, referred to as the "Ashcroft Directive," declared that the use of federally controlled substances to assist someone in committing suicide violates the CSA, and should not be considered a "legitimate medical purpose." This ruling placed the CSA in direct conflict with Oregon's Death With Dignity Act, which allows physicians to prescribe medication to end the life of a terminally ill patient.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this recent Ninth Circuit case the issues centered on compatibility between video games. Accolade copied a Sega video game to obtain compatibility with the Sega Genesis game system.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Del Mar v. PAGCOR

    • 22534 Words
    • 91 Pages

    These two consolidated petitions concern the issue of whether the franchise granted to the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) includes the right to manage and operate jai-alai.…

    • 22534 Words
    • 91 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays