Preview

Marbury V. Madison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marbury V. Madison
Marbury v. Madison

As the government was newly establishing its stronghold on the nation a struggle to preserve the foundations of American society instituted by Washington and John Adams existed as Thomas Jefferson took office. In an attempt to maintain the "edifice of the National Government" believing Jefferson would topple the prestigious nation with his atheist views, Adams appointed various Federalists to the judiciary. Thus, attributing to the single most significant case of the Supreme Court, Marbury v. Madison, a struggle between Republicans and Federalists that would end in a future altered by fate. This controversial landmark case established the constitution as "Supreme law" of the United States and developed the power of the Supreme Court, enhancing its independence and proving it a nonpartisan instrument. It established the precedent for the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of laws, through the principle of judicial review. The development of this power to interpret the constitution instituted the flexibility of the constitution and the ability to forge a road of precedent unfamiliar to the new government, as well as firmly grounding the role of the Judicial Branch.

To uphold the precedent already established in the United States by Federalists such as Washington and in fear of the Democratic republican ideas of Jefferson, Adams was determined to keep the federalists in office. Jefferson would have power over congress, but in a "midnight appointment", Adam's last day in office he created a "judiciary with a stronghold of Federalism". A few technicalities derived into a failure to deliver the commissions and therefore once discovered by Jefferson who saw them as a judiciary of "ardent political leaders," they were kept from delivery. Jefferson, wanting control appointed some of his own judges, and attempted to abolish the jobs of the new circuit judges, of the few whom received their commission. Thus, threatening the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Throughout my time as a Political Science major a constant topic in the conversations was that of judicial review. My professor’s automatically assume we know everything there is to know about judicial review. So when it comes to the case of Marbury V. Madison I knew the basics of the case but I did not know the reasons and all the facts. When I picked this case it was out of confusion behind the events that gave the Supreme Court its powers. Through examining the legal, environmental and personal perspective of the case we can get to the bottom of why they ruled way they did.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, it is the duty and responsibility of the judicial department to say what the law is. If a law is in opposition to the constitution the court must decide the case conforming exclusively either to the law or to the constitution.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is without a doubt the most monumental document of our country’s history. From the time it was released there have been different thoughts on how the Constitution was meant to be interpreted. The Republicans thought of the Constitution as a code of strict guidelines there were to be followed by all citizens over which it stood. The Federalists on the other hand thought that the Constitution was more of a basis on which to act and that its rules could be broadened. During the time when Jefferson and Madison resided as president the views on the Constitution changed do to issues at the time. Both presidents found that there original stand points on the Constitution were beginning to change and they found themselves on middle ground.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the last of President Adams term he wanted to ensure Federalist took control of the Judiciary branch so he named forty-two justices of the piece and sixteen circuit court justices for Washington DC. Once the commissions were signed by the President Adams the Secretary of State had the commissions sealed however they were not delivered by the end of President Adams term. President Jefferson was the incoming president he chose not to honor the commissions due to them not being submitted in time.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another factor which effected the nation’s unity was the court. Since John Adams appointed “midnight judges” to the Supreme Court during the final…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the ratification of the Constitution in 1789, the United States of America was still in its infancy. The newly delegated government officials in the three branches of the government were each responsible for laying the foundation of a country for future generations. In the executive branch, presidential members assumed the roles of setting precedents for the following presidents. George Washington knew his influences as the first president. Along with his cabinet, he began the journey by the United States, in stabilizing the country through the power he held. In lieu of Washington’s reserved ways, the successive president, known as John Adams, provoked mixed feelings among Americans. Despite political differences among the U.S., he knew…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is because the act was passed just before the end of his presidency, and it is said that Adams appointed many of the judges at midnight before Jefferson’s inauguration. Along with choosing the new judges, Adams made another move so that Federalists could further control the Judicial system. He appointed his Secretary of State, John Marshall, to serve as the next Chief Justice. Doing this further shut Jefferson out from the Judiciary system, leaving all of the power in the hands of the Federalists. Adams specifically felt that it was necessary because Marshall told him that by controlling the Judiciary system, the Federalists would upset Jefferson’s plans as that was the only branch of government that he wouldn’t have access to. Adams didn’t initially want to choose Marshall as the Chief Justice. However, after John Jay declined the position, Adams turned to Marshall who…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacobson V. United States

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS= On September 24, 1987, Keith Jacobson was indicted on charges of violating a provision of the Child Protection Act of 1984, which criminalizes the knowing receipt through mail of a "visual depiction [that] involves the use of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct." On Feb 1984 Jacobson ordered two magazines in the mail of young boys. The magazines entitled Bare Boys 1 and Bare Boys 2, contained material of nude young boys from preteen to teens. Jacobson claimed that he want to order material of 18 year olds and up. However Jacobson's receipt of the magazines was legal under both federal and Nebraska laws. Laws were constructed three months after the order was filled that banned all sexual depictions of children. Soon after the Gov. started setting up Jacobson by sending him applications to phony organizations that were illegally based.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ap gov courts

    • 718 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. Marbury v Madison introduced the concept of judicial review. Judicial review allows the judiciary to check the actions of the executive and legislative branches if it is believe that these bodies did not act in accordance to the constitution. By bringing about judicial review, Marbury v Madison strengthened the system of checks and balances.…

    • 718 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ilya, Shapirol.(Fall 2012). Like Eastwood Talking To A Chair: The Good The Bad and The…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Jefferson, American Founding Father and the principal author of The Declaration of independence, theorized that “the care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government.” Jefferson pointed to “unalienable rights,” and these rights were “giving to us by our creator and not by a government.” To protect the fundamental and individuals rights accordingly, James Madison was involved by including the Bill of Rights to The Constitution. The intention with these, was to remove the power from government reach only. Years after the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution was put in place, a remarkable Landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court was news and continues to…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison. At the time, the secretary of state, James Madison, refused to deliver the commission of the District of Columbia’s designated justice of the peace, William Marbury. In response, Marbury requested a writ of mandamus (or “an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion” (Mandamus).) to make commission delivery official amongst all members in government. Chief justice John Marshall refused Marbury’s request and concluded that the Supreme Court was not given the power by the Constitution to supply writs of mandamus even if elected officials, such as Marbury (or any other government officials), were entitled to their commissions (Marbury v. Madison). Even though the Supreme Court was denied power at the time, its power increased in the long-run by establishing that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is” (The Creation of the Federal Courts). Basically, the federal courts were given the power to strike down unconstitutional legislation and the concept of “judicial review” (which means that federal courts gained the power to null Congressional acts that conflicted with the Constitution) was officially established as a common practice during the lawmaking…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This historic court case established the concept of Judicial Review or the ability of the Judiciary Branch to declare a law unconstitutional. This case brought the Judicial Branch of the government on a more even power basis with the Legislative and Executive Branches. The Founding Fathers expected the branches of government to act as checks and balances on each other. The historic court case Marbury v. Madison accomplished this end thereby setting the precedent for numerous historic decisions in the future.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Models

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most popular court cases is McCulloch v. Maryland. In 1819 there wasn’t much judicial power because the Supreme Courts were still getting settled in, and the public was still skeptical in weather they could trust them or not. The McCulloch v. Maryland court case was in the Marshall Court. John Marshall was the chief justice at this time and he is the one who made the Supreme Court a serious player in government. Marshall Court had a pattern of expanding national power. “The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland expanded national power in two ways…” (Geer, Schiller, Segal, and Herrara 2016) The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, allowed the national government to the right to create a bank. This decision limited state power by, “denying the states the authority to tax activities of the national government.” (Geer, Schiller, Segal, and Herrara 2016) The decision of the court was justified by their interpretation of the Constitution. “In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Court ruled that the Bank of the United States was constitutional and that the Maryland tax was unconstitutional. Concerning the power of Congress to charter a bank, the Court turned to the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8, which expressly grants Congress the power to pass laws "necessary and proper" for the execution of its "enumerated powers."” (McBride 2006) This court case is one of the most important because it established the ways the Supreme Court…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Marbury v. Madison, the U.S Supreme Court asserted its power to review acts of Congress and invalidate those that conflict with the Constitution.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays