Mapp v. Ohio, 1961

According to the Court’s decision, why may illegally seized evidence not be used in a trial? Justice Tom C. Clark wrote on the courts behalf saying that it was logically and constitutionally necessary that the exclusion doctrine be insisted upon, even in the states. This doctrine is essential to the right of privacy, therefore evidence that is found illegally without a warrant must not be used in a trial, for this would be unconstitutional.

Why, according to Justice Clark, is it better for a criminal to go free than to convict the criminal with illegally seized evidence? Under the exclusion doctrine, if the police accidentally seize evidence illegally--even if it proves a criminal guilty--the evidence must be thrown out. Justice Clark responded to this problem saying, “The criminal goes free, if he must, but it is the law that sets him free. Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence.”

What was the illegally seized evidence in the Mapp case? The police found material in Mapp’s house that they deemed obscene, including lewd and lascivious book and pictures in her possession.

What was the “double standard” referred to in the Court’s decision? The double-standard related to the differing rules under which federal and state police operated, and the complications that arose when state and federal agencies both worked on a case.

Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer. I absolutely agree with the Court’s decision in the case. Dollree Mapp knew her rights of privacy and it would be unconstitutional for only federal courts to agree with these rights and not states. This protection of privacy is stated in the Constitution, therefore the entire United States should comply with this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mapp v Ohio

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio (1962) i. Plaintiff, Dollree Mapp, was illegally raided by Cleveland police. After receiving information that an individual, wanted in connection with a recent bombing, was hiding in Mapp's house, the Cleveland police knocked on her door and demanded entrance. On the other hand, the defendant was the state of Ohio. The police were looking for a bombing suspect and during the search found a gun and obscene literature. ii. On May 23, 1957, police officers in Cleveland, Ohio believed that…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp v. Ohio

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio On May 23, 1957, police officers in a Cleveland, Ohio suburb received information that a suspect of a bombing case, as well as some illegal betting equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Three officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter, but Mapp refused to let them in without a search warrant. Two officers left, and one remained. Three hours later, the two returned with several other officers with a piece of paper and broke in the door. Mapp asked…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Criminal Procedure and the Constitution September 13, 2012 Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Facts: In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the police thought Dollree Mapp was hiding a suspect they were looking for in connection with building a bomb. The police officers lied and said they had a search warrant of which they did not and forced their way into Mapp’s home and searched it. While searching the home, the police found evidence, not for a bomb, but of pornographic material that violated…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp v. Ohio Case Brief

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Mapp v. Ohio, 170 Ohio St. 427, 166 N. E. 2d 387, reversed. 2. Dollree Mapp was convicted on one count in the Ohio State Court for the possession of obscene material. The possession of obscene material was illegal in Ohio and the time of the search. There was dispute of whether or not the search was permitted by search warrant. She was eventually found guilty of by the State of Ohio because the state said, “even if the search were made without authority, otherwise unreasonably, it is not prevented…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Title: Mapp v. Ohio Legal Citation: 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1680, 6 L.ED.2d. 1081 (1961( Procedural History: Mapp petition for a writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court for the appreal from the Supreme Court of Ohio. Statement of key Issues: 1) was the search of Mapps home a violation of the fourth amendment? 2) Was the evidence used against Mapps in court illegal? Facts: On May 23, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at Mapps Home to ask them questions pertaining to someone…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    CRJU 310 Judge Oberholzer April 12, 2009 Mapp v. Ohio * Mapp v. Ohio * 367 U.S. 643 * (1961) * Character of Action Mrs. Mapp was found guilty and sentenced to prison 1-7 years. Mrs. Mapp and her attorney took the case to the Supreme Court in Ohio. * Facts: Three police officers went to Dollree Mapp’s house asking permission to enter into her house, because they believed that she was hiding a fugitive in her home. When she did not allow the police officers…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Essay Example

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    MAPP V. OHIO 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Ms. Dollree Mapp and her daughter lived in Cleveland, Ohio. After receiving information that an individual wanted in connection with a recent bombing was hiding in Mapp's house, the Cleveland police knocked on her door and demanded entrance. Mapp called her attorney and subsequently refused to let the police in when they failed to produce a search warrant. After several hours of surveillance and the arrival of more officers, the police again sought entrance…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 1081, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961) Facts: On May 23rd, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at the home of Mrs. Mapp with information that ‘a person was hiding out in the home, who was wanted for questioning in connection with a recent bombing, and that there was a large amount of policy paraphernalia being hidden in the home’. Mrs. Mapp and her daughter lived on the top floor of the two-family dwelling. Upon their arrival at that house, the officers…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio, noteworthy court case of 1961. The US Supreme Court decided that when the state officers attained evidence through illegal searches and seizures might not be admissible into criminal trials. The case was about a Cleveland lady, Dolly Mapp, who was held for having obscene materials. Law enforcement had learned the materials in Dolly Mapp house during their illegal search. When the state convicted, Dolly Mapp appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Her argument was that her constitutional…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    affiliated with one. The main purpose of criminal law is to ensure that those who break the law will in return be punished. Mapp v Ohio became one of many cases in the criminal procedure that made a huge impact on the fourth amendment in regards to how law enforcement officials could not use evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment in trial. Long story short, Dollree Mapp was convicted of having obscene materials after police conducted an illegal search of her home for a fugitive. What…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays