Mapp vs. Ohio Cort Case

Topics: Supreme Court of the United States, Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Mapp v. Ohio Pages: 4 (1458 words) Published: January 23, 2012
Mapp V Ohio
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,” Mapp V. Ohio (1961) dealt with that very sentence of the constitution. Were the officers at fault or Mapp? This complex question has a complex answer one that puzzled the Supreme Court and led to a change in criminal procedure. The verdict was a strict interpretation of the constitution. The fourth amendment was relevant because the fourteenth amendment grunted due process. It was a very good decision, it protected the black minority who at the time were being routinely harassed and convicted for no reasons. This decision certainly did not stop that but it made it harder for the police to seize evidence unlawfully and put a stop to bad practice of law at the state level. The land mark Supreme Court ruling on Mapp v Ohio changed the way people thought of the fourth amendment and how it could be applied to protect the individual form unlawful search and seizure. Previously the law surrounding the fourth amendment’s protection from unjust searches was extremely enigmatic. Its application varied form case to case until the Weeks rule was enacted in 1914. The Supreme Court ruled that evidence obtained via an illegal search and seizure was not admissible in federal court. However the Supreme Court did not make the states adopt the Weeks rule. The legal loop hole it created made it legal for states to present and prosecute with evidence detained in an unconstitutional tactic. In Mapp v Ohio a case that brought all the questions into the spotlight. On May 23, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at appellant's residence in that city perusing information that "a person [was] hiding out in the home, who was wanted for questioning in connection with a recent bombing, and that there was a large amount of policy paraphernalia being hidden in the home." Ms. Mapp was living with her...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Mapp vs Ohio(Court Case) Essay
  • Mapp v. Ohio Case Brief Essay
  • Mapp v. Ohio Essay
  • Mapp V. Ohio Essay
  • Mapp V. Ohio Essay
  • Mapp V Ohio Essay
  • Mapp v Ohio Essay
  • The 4th Amendement and Mapp v. Ohio Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free