Preview

Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 1081, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961)

Facts: On May 23rd, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at the home of Mrs. Mapp with information that ‘a person was hiding out in the home, who was wanted for questioning in connection with a recent bombing, and that there was a large amount of policy paraphernalia being hidden in the home’. Mrs. Mapp and her daughter lived on the top floor of the two-family dwelling. Upon their arrival at that house, the officers knocked on the door and demanded entrance but Mrs. Map telephoned her attorney who told her not to let them in without a search warrant. Three hours later more officers arrived and they again sought entrance into the home. When she didn’t come to the door immediately at least one of several doors was forced open and the policemen gained admittance. She demanded to see a search warrant and the officers flashed a piece of paper in which she grabbed and put in her blouse. A struggle ensued and she was arrested. Officers entered the home and found the obscene materials. Mrs. Mapp was convicted of knowingly having had in her possession and under her control certain lewd and lascivious books and pictures unlawfully seized during an unlawful search of the defendant’s home.
…show more content…
Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Ohio found that her conviction was valid though ‘based primarily upon the introduction in evidence of lewd and lascivious books and pictures unlawfully seized during an unlawful search of the defendant’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    98 N.J. Super. 235, 236 A.2d 630, N.J. Super. Lexis 389 (1967) Superior court of New Jersey, Law Division…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Cleveland detective (McFadden), on a downtown beat which he had been patrolling for many years, observed two stranger on a street corner. He saw them proceed alternately back and forth along an identical route, pausing to stare in the same store window, which they did for a total of about 24 times. Each completion of the route was followed by a conference between the two on a corner, at one of which they were joined by a third man who left swiftly. Suspecting the two men of "casing a job, a stick-up," the officer followed them and saw them rejoin the third man a couple of blocks away in front of a store. The officer approached the three, identified himself as a policeman, and asked their names. The men "mumbled something," whereupon McFadden spun petitioner around, patted down his outside clothing, and found in his overcoat pocket, but was unable to remove, a pistol. The officer ordered the three into the store. He removed petitioner's overcoat, took out a revolver, and ordered the three to face the wall with their hands raised. He patted down the outer clothing of Chilton and Katz and seized a revolver from Chilton's outside overcoat pocket. He did not put his hands under the outer garments of Katz (since he discovered nothing in his pat-down which might have been a weapon), or under petitioner's or Chilton's outer garments until he felt the guns. The three were taken to the police station. Petitioner and Chilton were charged with carrying concealed weapons.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Safford Arizona school on October 8th, officials strip-searched a 13-year-old girl after they received information from another student that the girl possessed "prescription strength" 400 mg ibuprofen and 200mg naproxen. While attending math, assistant principle Kerry Wilson entered the classroom and instructed Savanna Redding's to his office. Upon entering, she immediately noticed her planner placed on his desk. However, what she didn't recognize was the knife, cigarette and lighter that was contained inside it. Admitting the planner was hers, she explained to the assistant principle that she had lent the planner prior to her classmate, Marissa and had NO knowledge of what was inside it. Also brought to her attention was a large white bottle of ibuprofen that was also found in the planner. Unsatisfied, the assistant principle asked to also search the rest of her belongings in order to disprove her claim. When no evidence was found, he proceeded to send her to the school's nurses office for what can be considered a strip-search. She was told to remove a clothing and in the processes her private areas (breast) were exposed. Complete embarrassed, she remained calm and did as she was told. No pills, or any other illegal item was found on her. Naturally, when Savanna 's mom discovered this she "dropped the bomb" and filed a lawsuit saying it violated her daughter's fourth amendment right (which was the right thing to do)and that she was never contacted during the search at anytime. Proceeding to the trial, the District court found no violation and a panel agreed, but on the appeal in a "en banc decision 6-5" the court reversed the other decision saying that it DID in fact violate her fourth amendment right. School district appealed to the Supreme Court and approved there appeal and granted certiorari. It was reasoned that the strip search was not justified nor was the scope of intrusion reasonably…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Horton v California

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In California a police officer decided to search petitioner Horton’s home because he felt there was probable cause, the officer was searching for the stolen goods and the weapons used during the crime. The warrant given to the officer only authorized him to search for the stolen goods. As he made his way into the home of petitioner Horton he did not recover the stolen items, but found the weapons used during the crime and recovered them. When it got to the court the recovered weapons were allowed to be used against Horton, and Horton was later convicted of the crime. Since the officer testified that he did have intentions of looking for other evidence while looking for the stolen goods, the California court of appealed the conviction and then granted certiorari.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1914, Weeks v. United States was decided by the Supreme Court. In Weeks, the Court made a landmark decision relating to illegal search and seizure by law enforcement called the Exclusionary Rule. The Exclusionary Rule provided that evidence “illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of a suspect’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against the suspect in a criminal prosecution.” (Exclusionary Rule, 2010, p. 287). However, it was not until the 1961 case of Mapp v. Ohio that the Court made the Exclusionary Rule binding on the states…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    On May 23, 1957, police officers in a Cleveland, Ohio suburb received information that a suspect in a bombing case, as well as some illegal betting equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Three officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter, but Mapp refused to admit them without a search warrant. Two officers left, and one remained. Three hours later, the two returned with several other officers. Brandishing a piece of paper, they broke in the door. Mapp asked to see the “warrant” and took it from an officer, putting it in her dress. The officers struggled with Mapp and took the piece of paper away from her. They handcuffed her for being “belligerent.”…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V Ohio

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the Court’s decision, why may illegally seized evidence not be used in a trial?…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prosecuting Argument

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The prosecution’s argument is that the defendant is not only guilty of the charges brought against him in the matter of State v. Stu Dents but is liable as well because he knowingly and purposefully committed the crimes on the victim, Uma Opee. All three elements, mens rea, actus reus, and concurrence were present at the time. Mr. Dents was very detailed and meticulous in the manner in which he went about, as he penned in fulfilling his destiny in the journal found by officers in his home. This is considered premeditated. Probable cause has been established in connecting the defendant tothe crime through DNA testing. Officers found mor than 300 photographs stapled to a wall in a locked room located in the back of the defendant’s home. Three counts of possession will be sought for the MDMA also known as ecstasy, cocaine, and methamphetamine drugs found in the defendant’s home. Kidnapping as the victim was taken by force from her place of residence. Signs of cuts and bruises on the victim’s shows Uma put up a struggle. The victim’s hands and feet were tied with rope; particles of which were found in the victim’s home along with blood spots. The victim’s jewelry, specifically an inscribed ring, was found among the defendant’s possession. Lastly, the defendant intentionally assaulted a law enforcement officer when he punched Officer T. Chur in…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Policing

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Mapp v. Ohio. 367 United States. 643. (1961). Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=589965672959279882&q=Mapp+v+Ohio&hl=en&as_sdt=2,15&as _vis=1 (This case outlines the case law around constitutional policing in the United States.)…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This case has a similar background to those of the assignment. The original action is based in 1962 in the city of Jackson, Mississippi. In that lawsuit, Clark v. Thompson, 206 F. Supp. 539 (SD Miss. 1962), the…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plain View Doctrine

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today’s computer storage capacity has brought about new controversy surrounding the plain view doctrine in context to a legally executed search warrant of a suspects hard drive in order to find evidence of a particular crime being investigated. When an officer searches a physical location while executing a search warrant and discovers evidence of another crime other than the one being investigated, that evidence is said to be in “plain view,” which can be seized and used to support a criminal prosecution. Many courts have simply applied the plain view doctrine to computer searches. For example, if an officer is searching a suspects’ computer with a legal warrant for evidence linked to a particular crime, but discovers files containing child…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 23, 1957, police officers in Cleveland Ohio suburb received information that a suspect in a bombing case, as well as some illegal betting equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Three officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter, but Dollree Mapp refused to admit them without a search warrant. Two officers left, and one remained. Three hours later, the two officers returned with several officers. Showing a piece of paper they broke in the door. Dollree Mapp asked to see the warrant and took it from an officer, putting it in her dress. The officers struggled with Mapp and took the piece of paper away from her. They handcuffed her for being belligerent. They did not find the bombing suspect or the gambling equipment. They did however, find pornographic material in a trunk in her basement. She was arrested, prosecuted, and found guilty for possession of pornographic material. Mrs. Mapp and her attorney appealed this decision…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observation

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bibliography: Gumpresht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Harris v. Coweta County, No. 03-15094, 433 F.3d 807 (11th Cir. 2005), cert. granted sub nom., Scott v. Harris, 127 S. Ct. 468 (2006)…

    • 3453 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule is an important doctrine supporting the ideals of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Fourth Amendment provides people under the jurisdiction of the American criminal justice system protections from unreasonable searches and seizures. The amendment also delineates the methods members of the criminal justice system may obtain information via judicially sanctioned search warrants based on probable cause. The exclusionary rule exempts some evidence even when the seizure or location of the evidence may violate the Fourth Amendment. The rule also provides some benefits and detriments for members of the criminal justice system when gathering evidence or prosecuting offenders. However, the exclusionary rule is an important doctrine to members of the criminal justice system demonstrating a means to introduce evidence in the furtherance of justice.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays