Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Ghandi are both two revoutionaly men. Racism was and is a problem in todays and yesterdays culture. These men fought for equal rights of all men and women, no matter the color or origin. This paper will compare the two men not competitivly but as a "based on the facts" comparison.
Both men tried to stop the violence and racial hatred by using non-violence techniques. Ghandi has been known for fasting. Fasting means stopping eating intill his request is acknologed and completed. Ghandi fasted during riots and qould not stop intill he had proof that all violence had stopped. The only reason that this worked so well for him is because he was so respected in his socity. Mandela never fasted for his purpose, he found other ways of controlling his followers. Both of the men used rallys as their main campain gathering technique. These public events often ended in somekind of non-violent protesting.
Prison is one of the many things that these men have in common, both of them served many years. Nelson Mandela served 27 years in his prison, the full sentence he had been given. Ghandi did not only go to prison once, but many times, he had served his several sentences in South Africa and India. Many times these charges that they were held upon were a law that would pass just to prosicute Ghandi or Mandela to lock them up.
Both Mandela and Ghandi started as laywers, then moved into the field of being a active political member, in Mandela's case this was the ANC (African National Congress). Then came the next step of them devoting their entire lives to their own hope that some day they will make a difrence. They were both more succecfull than anticipated by their enemys and rightfuly so.
In the end both Ghandi and Mandela had many diffrences and similaritys but both are extradordanary men. They were very succesful, no one would think that 1 man could make such an impact in their country, and in Ghandi's case two countrys. For these men to do such a act will be remberd for years to come. Will their ever be another like these men, only time will tell that.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Mahatmas Gandhi and Maximilien Robespierre were two revolutionary leaders who were seeking for religious change. Both nationalist, or person who advocates political independence for a country, handled these revolutions in different ways ,one using nonviolence and one using terror. Also both leaders expected different rewards in conclusion of their protests.…
- 287 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Topic: Comparing and contrasting the different strategies and tactics of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. The research will present each man’s background and analyze their successes and failures during the civil rights movement. Throughout my analysis, I will argue that Martin Luther King was far more successful as a African-American civil rights leader than Malcolm X. Through his courage and selfless devotion, MLK’s movements and marches significantly changed the fabric of American life.…
- 299 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
While Gandhi had a more peaceful and nonviolent way of defying the government and trying to equalize all the social classes,…
- 400 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Nelson Mandela was a visionary freedom fighter who brought about the end of an apartheid society and solidified the democratic elections of presidents by majority rule to South Africa. Born in 1918, Mandela’s early introduction to leadership in the Thembu tribe molded his democratic beliefs ("Nelson Mandela," 2009). His youth found him exposed to Western culture which ultimately led him to abandon the Thembu culture and relocate to Johannesburg ("Nelson Mandela," 2009). It was during his early years in Johannesburg that he explored the many political philosophies that surrounded him. It was also during this time that Mandela began thoughtful observation and contemplation of the struggles of the black men and women in South Africa. Mandela came to the conclusion, “It was not lack of ability that limited my people, but lack of opportunity” (Sohail, 2005). His profound dissatisfaction with the apartheid society and the oppression of his people eventually led him to join the African National Congress or ANC in 1944 ("Nelson Mandela," 2009).…
- 1554 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Nelson Mandela became a leader in the African national congress. At first he pushed hard for the congress and the protesters to follow Ghandi’s non-violent approach. He…
- 189 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In my opinion I think they are because Martin Luther King and Gandhi felt the same way in changing society. In Martin Luther king's article It shows how by bringing other people together It can make a difference. He speaks for the people and stands up for his own race and relates a lot to gandhi's situation. King states that having a different color should discriminate you as a person. In another hand, gandhi would also stand up for him and his people. Gandhi would bring all the people together to stop the discrimination of his country. Non Violent protest is a great way to work out a situation,King and gandhi used this strategy to have the rights as a human.…
- 121 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
“To be great is to be misunderstood,” a famous quote written by the transcendentalist, Emerson, in Self-Reliance. Going by the nickname “Mahatma” which truly means “great soul”, Ghandi was one of the most misunderstood people in history. Ghandi is characterized as a scrawny simplistic dressed man born in 1869 in India, however he is one of the most complex and contradictory characters in all of history (McGeary). Ghandi was raised under two religious parents who practiced Hinduism, and pushed for him to become a government minister, taking after his father (Adams). Being extremely shy, Ghandi did not suit the job of being a lawyer well a fled to India (McGeary). In South Africa Ghandi was quickly discriminated upon by the white British inhabitants,…
- 1061 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
He believed that Government policy had created an atmosphere in which “violence by the African people had become inevitable” and that “unless reasonable leadership was given…to control the feelings of [the]people”, “there would be outbreaks of terrorism which would produce…hostility between the various races.” No other way was open to the African people, to fight “in their struggle against the principle of White Supremacy.” He refused to acknowledge the decree that the ANC was an “unlawful organization” and said the acceptance of such a decree would be “equivalent to accepting the silencing of the Africans for all time”. Mandela was not a violent man and did not resort to violence lightly, but it seemed to be the only way to accomplish the ANC’s goals, as “all lawful modes of expressing opposition to this principle had been closed by legislation.” Mandela did not want an “international war and tried to avoid it to the last minute”, but also stated that his ideals were “worth dying for”. It was degrading for the African people to be thought of as a “separate breed” and “the fight against poverty and lack of human dignity” “was real and not imaginary.” To say differently was demeaning. The enforcement of apartheid lead to terrible conditions for blacks and “to a breakdown in moral standards” resulting in “growing violence.” Mandela and the ANC leaders were attracted to communism for the simple fact that “for decades [the] communists were the only political group in South Africa who were prepared to treat Africans and human beings and their…
- 665 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Gandhi was a an example of a socialist in which added on to his status of a world leader. One of the main contributions he made socially were the making of non violence organizations. Non-violence was expressed deeply and was the priority in putting his cause forward(Appadorai). His movements were focused on the principles of satyagraha. Satyagraha is an important part of many of his protests but there is more two it than that. Gandhi followed the views of coming together to meet a consensus. He believed that in sitting down, without the use of violence, they will be able to agree on something that will satisfy the wants of both parties(Gandhi). Mahatma Gandhi was prosperous in his movements to gain his countries freedom. You can say this considering the fact that he got India's Independence. After many struggles India had finally gained the rights they deserved. This important day in history was August 15, 1947. Gandhi impacted and influenced people and the world in the present as much as he did in the years after…
- 1080 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Suggested Grade Levels: 2-4 Suggested Curriculum Areas: Social Studies and Language Arts Goals: To study M.L.K. and Mahatma Gandhi’s use of nonviolent protest. Objectives: Students will read about the life of Martin Luther King Jr. Students will view a slide show about the life of Mahatma Gandhi. Students will compare and contrast the lives of M.L.K. and Gandhi using a Venn diagram. Background information for teachers on Mahatma Gandhi: Please check out the Center for South Asia’s website http://www.wisc.edu/southasiaoutreach/lessons/figures/figures.htm…
- 246 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Both movements fought government policies as well as social racism. The protesters from both countries fought for replacement of policies such as segregation in schools and Apartheid as well as equality in the eyes of their government and fellow citizens . Both movements also had a large contingency of youth involved. One can also compare the leadership qualities and lives of Nelson Mandela of South Africa and Martin Luther King, Jr., leader of the American civil rights…
- 1076 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
They both accomplished their goal of freeing African peoples and becoming presidents of their countries. They are different because Abraham Lincoln did not engage in illegal actions or violence and Nelson Mandela engaged in illegal actions and violence towards the government. In addition to the men being similar, they both misled the government in order to free African peoples. Lincoln and Mandela are amazing men and leaders and their accomplishments will forever be talked…
- 1372 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
There exist societal paths which differ based on time and place. These paths may have similar topography and may frequently converge, but each creates a separate journey. The belief in passive resistance is defined through the life choices of two great emancipators: Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi. Passive resistance is a means of bringing about the end to legally executed injustice, specifically through peaceful resistance. Scholars have noted connections between the nonviolent movement of Martin Luther King and the philosophies of Gandhi. The two are closely related and share common and obvious themes. While King and Gandhi concur on the courage nonviolence requires, the deplorable nature of cowardly behavior and the necessity of nonviolence as retaliation to oppressors, their beliefs are also defined by quite distinct divergences. They are giant figures in 20th century history; their views on the speed of change and the degree of suffering which is necessary during revolutions and movements are relatively different. These disparities and similarities form elements of their philosophies and the rather successful outcomes to King and Gandhi’s life purposes.…
- 1084 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Nelson Mandela was the first symbol of strength for black people who was alive and kicking and relevant in my world. He inspired me to see the importance of political strength and political…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The South African extremist and previous president Nelson Mandela (1918-2013) conveyed a conclusion to politically-sanctioned racial segregation and has been a worldwide promoter for human rights. An individual from the African National Congress party starting in the 1940s, he was a pioneer of both serene dissents and furnished resistance against the white minority's severe administration in a racially isolated South Africa. His activities landed him in jail for about three decades and made him the substance of the antiapartheid development both inside his nation and universally. Discharged in 1990, he took an interest in the destruction of politically-sanctioned racial segregation and in 1994 turned into the principal dark president of South…
- 158 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays