Preview

Mandatory Random Drug Testing

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1596 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mandatory Random Drug Testing
Patti Pangallo GE217

14 November 2011

Mandatory Random Drug Testing

Crunch! A warehouse employee’s foot has just been run over by a forklift driver. During the accident investigation it was discovered that the forklift driver had been under the influence of marijuana. No one wants his/her doctor to be drunk or high on drugs as he slices him/her open with a scalpel. Regardless if the operation is successful, he/she will be much happier knowing the doctor was not impaired. A person walking his/her dog on a sidewalk near a high-rise construction site sees a construction crane. He/she will be much more content knowing that the crane operator knows exactly what he/she is doing. Mandatory drug testing is necessary to maintain a safe work environment.

In 1986, former President Ronald Reagan signed Executive Order 12564, which requires all federal employees to avoid using illegal drugs, whether on or off-duty, as a condition for federal employment. In 1988, Congress passed the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, which, in turn, initiated the creation of federal Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs (Section 503 of Public Law 100-71). The mandatory guidelines apply to the uniformed services, contractors or service providers under contract with the federal government, and to executive agencies of the federal government. Even though the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 applies to federal employees, state and local governments followed along and adopted similar programs under state laws and drug-free workplace programs (Drug testing, 2011).

The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Fourth amendent, n.d.). Some



References: American Civil Liberties Union. (1997, December 31). Privacy in america: Workplace drug testing. Retrieved from http://www.aclu.org/drug-law-reform_technology-and-liberty/privacy-america-workplace-drug-testing Drug testing LaFollette, H. (1994). Mandatory drug testing. In S. Luper-Foy & C. Brown (Eds.), Drugs, morality, and the law (pp. 283-299). Retrieved from http://www.hughlafollette.com/papers/drug.testing.htm Leson, G McClellan, C. (2011, March 28). What is a 5 panel drug test?. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/about_5050422_5-panel-drug-test_.html Results from the 2007 national survey on drug use and health: National findings Rhodes, J. (2009, January 29). The pros and cons of drug testing [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://www.helium.com/items/1317209-the-pros-and-cons-of-drug-testing Stepper, J

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment states that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Peak, 2006)."…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pre-employment drug testing and post hiring random testing has become common place in today’s business world. In order to ensure that their employees can function safely for the good of themselves, fellow employees and the company property, companies have adopted the practice of drug testing employees.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Nadelmann, Ethan (1989). Drug Prohibition in the United States: Cost, Consequences, and Alternatives. New Series, Vol. 245 No.4921 Page 939-947.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States 4th amendment states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Justice Policy

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    a. Mandatory Drug Testing: Drug testing in the work place for federal employees began on April 11, 1988 ("Mandatory guidelines for," 2008). Since the early inception of drug testing it has become a topic of debate. Is it right or wrong? Is it constitutional? Are the rights of American…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another point against mandatory drug testing is the issue of costs for either the necessary equipment or tools to test each employee. The argument against this is that the total cost for each test is outweighed by the possibility of a lawsuit or legal ramifications from another individual or party who was harmed or wronged by an employee while they were under the influence of either alcohol or another substance due to the absence of mandatory drug testing. Arguments against mandatory drug testing states the possibility of false positives in the results of drug tests. This is a valid point in that the purpose of mandatory drug testing is remove those under the influence and are impaired from their responsibility and at the same time, keep other members of society from harm. To counter that argument, the punishment for testing positive would be an immediate removal from the position but not a dismissal from their employment and to undergo additional testing to determine if the original positive result was the product of a false positive or an indication of use while in their respective…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug testing at work violates ones civil rights as stated in the Amendments and it also violates one’s personal privacy. A test for Drug in the workplace became when President Reagan signed "Executive Order 12564 -- Drug-free Federal workplace". This created the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" (“Fourth Amendment,” n.d., para .1).…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cornell University Law School the fourth amendment is, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Workplace Drug Testing

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Drug testing within the workplace has become a common practice over the past three decades. While employers continue to focus on eliminating the risks that are associated with drug use from their workplace many other areas are just realizing that drug testing is important. One such area is through workforce development and training. Focusing solely on Indiana, drug testing was implemented for all new individuals who were enrolled in training provided by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 on July 1, 2011. Individuals receiving this training were now subject to drug testing prior to starting the training process.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drugs in the Work Place

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Drug abuse by employees in the workplace is a major concern for many employers Approximately 16.4 million drug abusers and 15 million heavy alcohol users are employed full time.(www.samsha.org.gov/newsroom/ advisors/070713survey0610.aspx) 8 % of full time employees and 10.2 % of part time employees abuse drugs in the work place. (drugrecognition.com) Employers in the private industry are not required to have a drug free workplace policy. If an employer does adopt a drug free workplace policy, they should follow typical policy guidelines and make sure to implement the policy without jeopardizing employee’s legal rights. If an employer does implement a drug free work place policy, they are face with many issues such only having a written policy or including a drug testing policy. Including a drug testing policy raises questions on how to test, who to test, what drugs should be included for testing and how to enforce the policy per guidelines when issues arise. Consequently, employers are faced with whether or not to have a drug free work place policy and issues implementing policies if they choose to adopt a drug free workplace policy.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In each of the prior cases, the critical difference lied in the nature of the special need. The special need was not one connected to the interest of law enforcement. In this case, the policy’s feature from the inception of such was the use of law enforcement to coerce patients into substance abuse treatment. The main objective of the search was to generate evidence for law enforcement officials.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those who support random drug testing argue that the growing trend of drug testing a small population of students in a school is effective at attacking the drug abuse problem, because fewer students will use when there is an obvious consequence (Drug Testing in School Activities 2). They believe if a drug problem is identified early enough, there is a better chance for rehabilitation. This is true, and with this approach, maybe one life can be saved (Legal Issues of…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “At-risk, though circumscribed, segments of the U.S. workforce were identified with prevalence rates up to 55.8% for any use of illicit drugs and up to 28.0% for illicit drug use in the workplace” (Frone, 2006, p. 856). Substance abuse affects many in the workplace, and the individual’s drug or alcohol mistreatment has a harmful impact in various division of the workplace. Workers who dependent on drugs or alcohol can demonstrate low enthusiasm and be deficient in awareness of detail. When several staff engages in drug abuse, the complete work team can endure the effects. Along with the numerous harmful consequences of drug abuse in the workforce is the considerable financial lost that drug use incurs on employers. Drug abuse in the workforce elevates the danger of injuries and risk. A drug-free place of work policy presents vast importance to the work group, and helps maintain various core company goals. This paper will highlight the prevalence of illicit and prescription drug users in the United States workforce, the effects of drug abuse in the workplace, and the key characteristics and benefits associated with a drug-free workplace.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Testing in Schools

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A growing number of schools in the U.S. are drug testing students in hopes that it will curb student drug use. Since the start of the process in the early nineteen nineties, most schools have figured out that it results in little effect(Gerada). Many people would say that drug testing in schools is a waste of limited school funds, illegal, invades the students privacy, and a distraction to studies. Therefore, random drug testing within schools should be banned or replaced with a more convenient and professional motion.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics