Management Control Systems as a Package—Opportunities,

Topics: Management, Control theory, Control system Pages: 29 (10087 words) Published: March 10, 2010
Management Accounting Research 19 (2008) 287–300

Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions Teemu Malmi a,∗ , David A. Brown b

Department of Accounting & Finance, Helsinki School of Economics, Finland b School of Accounting, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

Abstract There has been very little explicit theoretical and empirical research on the concept of management control systems (MCS) as a package despite the existence of the idea in management accounting literature for decades. In this editorial we discuss a range of ways researchers have defined MCS and the problems this has created. We provide a new typology for MCS structured around five groups: planning, cybernetic, reward and compensation, administrative and cultural controls. The typology is based on the distinction between decision-making and control and addresses those controls managers use to direct employee behaviour. We discuss the conclusions of the articles included within this special issue and provide ideas for further research. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keyword: Management control systems package

1. Why study management control systems as a package? The idea of management control systems (MCS) operating as a package1 has existed for over 30 years (Otley, 1980) and there have been regular calls to study the phenomenon (Chenhall, 2003; Dent, 1990; Fisher, 1998; Flamholtz et al., 1985; Otley, 1980). Despite this there has been little explicit theorizing or empirical research on the topic (Abernethy and Chua, 1996; Alvesson and Karreman, 2004; Simons, 1995). There are a number of reasons why studying the MCS package phenomenon is important. Firstly, MCS do not operate in isolation. While much of the MCS research considers single themes or practices that are seemingly unconnected from each other and the context in which they operate, these invariably sit within a broader control system (Chenhall, 2003). This has several implications. For one, Fisher (1998) argued that if the links between various MCS are not recognized, then the way in which the considered MCS components relate to studied contingent variables will lead to erroneous conclusions. This idea is supported by Chenhall (2003) who warned that studying specific MCS elements in isolation has “the potential for serious model under specification” (p. 131). This may provide the underlying reason ∗

Corresponding author at: Helsinki School of Economics, Runeberginkatu 22-24, 00100 Helsinki, Finland. Tel.: +358 9 43138472; fax: +358 9 43138678. E-mail address: (T. Malmi). 1 As a general conception, a management control systems (MCS) package is a collection or set of controls and control systems. The individual control systems may be more traditional accounting controls such as budgets and financial measures, or administrative controls, for example organisation structure and governance systems, along with more socially based controls such as values and culture. Organisations may have numerous controls present, and they all may be used to some extent to align individual’s activities with organisational goals (Abernethy and Chua, 1996; Alvesson and Karreman, 2004; Flamholtz et al., 1985; Otley, 1980; Simons, 1995). 1044-5005/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003


T. Malmi, D.A. Brown / Management Accounting Research 19 (2008) 287–300

for Dent’s (1990) assessment of MCS contingency research when he argued that while some relationships have been found between some contingency variables and MCS, on the whole the “relationships are weak and the conclusions are fragmentary” (p. 10). In his more recent examination of contingency research, Chenhall (2003) supported Dent’s (1990) point and argued that the variables considered have not provided consistent explanations of the kind of MCS that fit organisation types or drive performance. A second and...

References: Abernethy, M.A., Brownell, P., 1997. Management control systems in research and development organizations: the role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (3/4), 233–248. Abernethy, M.A., Chua, W., 1996. Field study of control system ‘Redesign’: the impact of institutional process on strategic choice. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (2), 569–606. Alvesson, M., Karreman, D., 2004. Interfaces of control. technocratic and socio-ideological control in a global management consultancy firm. Accounting Organizations and Society 29, 423–444. Anthony, R., 1965. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Harvard University, Boston. Arrow, K.J., 1964. Control in large organizations. Management Science 10, 397–408.
T. Malmi, D.A. Brown / Management Accounting Research 19 (2008) 287–300
Birnberg, J., Snodgrass, C., 1988. Culture and control: a field study. Accounting Organizations and Society 13, 447–464. Bonner, S.E., Sprinkle, G.B., 2002. The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting Organizations and Society 27 (4/5), 303–345. Brown, D.A., 2005. Management control systems as a coupled package: an analytical framework and empirically grounded implications. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Technology, Sydney. Bunce, P., Fraser, R., Woodcock, L., 1995. Advanced budgeting: a journey to advanced management systems. Management Accounting Research 6 (3), 253–265. Chenhall, R., 2003. Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting Organizations and Society 28, 127–168. Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., Pitsis, T., 2005. Managing and Organizations: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. SAGE, London. Daft, R.L., 1983. Organization Theory and Design. West, St. Paul, MN. Dent, J., 1990. Strategy, organization and control: some possibilities for accounting research. Accounting Organizations and Society 15 (1/2), 3–25. Dent, J., 1991. Accounting and organizational cultures: a field study of the emergence of a new organizational reality. Accounting Organizations and Society 16, 705–732. Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., Merchant, K., 1990. Accounting for Management Control, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, Padstow, Cornwall, UK. Fisher, J.G., 1995. Contingency-based research on management control systems: categorisation by level of complexity. Journal of Accounting Literature 14, 24–53. Fisher, J.G., 1998. Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: past results and future directions. Behavioral Research in Accounting 10 (Supplement), 47–57. Flamholtz, E., 1983. Accounting, budgeting and control systems in their organizational context: theoretical and empirical and empirical perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society 8 (2/3), 35–50. Flamholtz, E., Das, T., Tsui, A., 1985. Toward an integrative framework of organizational control. Accounting Organizations and Society 10 (1), 35–50. Green, S., Welsh, M., 1988. Cybernetics and dependence: reframing the control concept. Academy of Management Review 13 (2), 287–301. Greenwood, R.C., 1981. Management by objectives: as developed by Peter Drucker, assisted by Harold Smiddy. Academy of Management Review 6 (2), 225–231. Hansen, S., Otley, D., Van der Stede, W., 2003. Practice developments in budgeting: an overview and research perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research 15, 95–116. Ittner, C.D., Larcker, D.F., 1998. Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10, 205–239. Ittner, C., Larcker, D., 2001. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32, 349–410. Kamoche, K., Cunha, M.P., 2001. Minimal structures: from jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organization Studies 22 (5), 733–764. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., 1992. The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70 (January–February), 71–79. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., 1996a. Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review 74 (January–February), 75–85. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., 1996b. Translating Strategy into Action: The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business Press, Boston. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., 2001a. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., 2001b. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part 1. Accounting Horizons 15 (1), 87–104. Kondrasuk, J.N., 1981. Studies in MBO effectiveness. Academy of Management Review 6 (3), 419–431. Koontz, H., O’Donnel, C., 1968. Principles of Management. McGraw-Hill, New York. Langfield-Smith, K., 1997. Management control systems and strategy: a critical review. Accounting Organizations and Society 22 (2), 207–232. Macintosh, N., Daft, R., 1987. Management control systems and departmental independencies: an empirical study. Accounting Organizations and Society 12 (1), 23–28. Malina, M., Selto, F., 2001. Communicating and controlling strategy: an empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13, 47–90. Merchant, K.A., Otley, D.T., 2007. A review of the literature on control and accountability. In: Chapman, C.S., Hopwood, A.G., Shields, M.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 785–802. Merchant, K., Van der Stede, W.A., 2007. Management Control Systems, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, Essex, England. Mintzberg, H., 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Orton, J.D., Weick, K.E., 1990. Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 15 (2), 203–233. Otley, D., 1980. The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5 (4), 413–428. Otley, D., Berry, A., 1980. Control, organization and accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5 (2), 231–244. Ouchi, W., 1979. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science 25 (9), 833–848. Pratt, J., Beaulieu, P., 1992. Organizational culture in public accounting: size, technology, rank and functional area. Accounting Organizations and Society 17, 667–689.
T. Malmi, D.A. Brown / Management Accounting Research 19 (2008) 287–300
Schein, E., 1997. Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. Simons, R., 1987. Accounting control systems and business strategy: an empirical analysis. Accounting Organizations and Society 12, 357–374. Simons, R., 1994. How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal 15, 169–189. Simons, R., 1995. Levers of Control. Harvard University Press, Boston. Strank, R., 1983. Management Principles and Practice. A Cybernetic Approach. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York. Zimmerman, J.L., 1997. Accounting for Decision-Making and Control, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Chicago, USA. Zimmerman, J.L., 2001. Conjectures regarding empirical managerial accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (1–3), 411–427.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Management Control Systems as a Package Research Paper
  • Management Control System Research Paper
  • Management control system Research Paper
  • Essay on nature of management control system
  • Management Control Systems Pdf Essay
  • Management Control System Design Essay
  • Management Control Systems Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free