Preview

Man Vs The Bible

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
680 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Man Vs The Bible
Man vs. the Bible

In today’s world, we are presented with many different thoughts and ideas that contradict the Bible. We can see many of these perspectives in psychology. Several psychologists created their own ideas for understanding why people think and behave the way that they do without consulting the Bible. It is important for us as Christians to be able to compare these ideas to the Bible and decide for ourselves if they agree or oppose each other. Both humans and animals function at a biological level. We are influenced by those around us, we follow our tendencies, and we have individual personalities. The Neuroscience Perspective studies the biological behaviors of humans and nonhumans. This perspective states that behavior comes from the brain, nervous system, and other biological functions. Mark 7:21 “For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders.” According to the Bible, our behavior comes from the heart and not from our mind. Another view states that our behavior is based off our inner motives and desires that we have little knowledge or control over. It also states that our dreams and subconscious actions are really windows into what our mind is truly thinking. The creator of
…show more content…
This lead to the Cognitive Perspective, which looks at the mind simply as a giant computer that stores information. Psalms 139:14 “I will praise thee; for I am fearfully [and] wonderfully made: marvelous [are] thy works; and [that] my soul knoweth right well.” Genesis 1:27 “So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” God intricately designed man in his own image; therefore our minds are more than giant computers that determine our nature. Ephesians 2:10 “For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Crabb (1977) proposes four distinct integration approaches that seek to uniquely implement various degrees of knowledge from the two most prominent bodies of literature relevant to biblical counseling: The World of God and secular psychology (p.32). The first integration approach, “Separate But Equal”, emphasizes a strong dichotomy between the Word of God and secular psychology (Crabb, 1977, p. 34). In this approach, the Word of God is used primarily for spiritual and theological issues within biblical counseling while secular psychology would be ideal for issues aligning…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basis of the book Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity: An Introduction to Worldview Issues, Philosophical Foundations, and Models of Integration by David N. Entwistle is that putting psychology and Christian theology together will help understand people better than using the two separately. Entwistle gives reasons why Christianity and Psychology can coexist and be used together to help make humanity better. The two books of God as described by Entwistle are the book of God’s word and the book of God’s works. This book does not focus on the differences between Christianity and Psychology but more so on how the two principles can be combined to offer better insight into the issues of the world. There are five integration models discussed: enemies, spies, colonialists, neutral parties, and allies all subscribing to a higher goal of community it uses theological and psychological concepts together to lead to better understanding of the truth (Entwistle 2010).…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dr. Crabb suggests that there are four viewpoints to integrating spirituality and psychology. The first being “Separate but Equal” This viewpoint ascertains that psychology and spirituality do not mix any more than if a person needs a filling for a cavity or the excising of their wisdom teeth, they do not peruse the scripture for direction the person goes to a dentist. This view is not solid for its very premise is flawed. When dealing with man’s troubling emotions and thinking scripture has much to say about this. For example in 1 Cor. 10:5, we are directed to control our thought life (Holy Bible). The second view “Tossed Salad” is acceptable in that it blends theology and psychology. It fails in that it is not careful in checking secular concepts in light of Biblical truth. The third view “Nothing Buttery”, fails in that it disregards psychology altogether. This view says that all that is needed is Christ. The fourth “Spoiling the Egyptians”, is the most balanced of the four approaches (Crabb, 1977). This approach teaches that psychology is under the authority of God’s word. The bible is God’s infallible, inerrant, inspired revelation. Scripture is to have priority over non-biblical opinion in a functional capacity.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Entwistle's (2010) Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity appears to be a text with a primary audience which appears to be conservative evangelical Christians. The basic ‘meat’ of the book is the premise that "weaving together perspectives from psychology and Christian theology can help us understand and appreciate humanity more fully than we could with either perspective alone" (p. 3). Entwistle’s view is that in faithful reading of both the book of God's work (nature) and the book of God's word (theology), this textbook seems to be the work of an individual whose true request is for a form of psychology that is aimed at the treatment of the total patient, mind, body and soul. "Christian understandings of personhood, the purpose of human life, our need for God, and the ethical teachings of Christian faith," Entwistle argues, "are integral to psychology, not merely parallel to it" (p. 199). By making his opinion clear throughout several sections within the text Entwistle is projecting his position on the subject of integrating theology and psychology very clear.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oswalt first learned about the issues in “The Bible Among the Myths” while taking a class taught by Dennis Kinlaw at Asbury Theological Seminary. His interest in the subject has grown since with graduate study and his own classes which he taught. William F. Albright, his students, and G. Ernest Wright led the rethinking of the evolutionary paradigm within the philosophy of Idealism. Although they believed the differences between the ways the Israelites thought and their neighbor’s thoughts of reality caused no evolutionary explanation to show, today it is found that Israelite faith can be explained by evolutionary change. Scholars today say that it is no longer about the differences between the two, but more about the similarities. Oswalt believed this was due to previous theological and philosophical convictions and not a change in data. From the 1950’s on, this change became hard for people to accept because it meant that we did not have control of our lives, and could not fend for ourselves.…

    • 5411 Words
    • 155 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    M Cat Review

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With life illustrations and brief counseling scenarios throughout this book, McMinn (1996) provides the reader with an excellent working model of identifying and relating life experiences to Psychology, Theology, and Spirituality. The opposition of modern psychology and theology practices is delivering different contemporary messages concerning mental health. Psychologist Albert Ellis wrote, “The emotionally healthy individual should primarily be true to himself and not masochistically sacrifice himself for others.” Versus Christian spirituality that identifies and states in scripture that as individuals we are instructed to look out for the interest of others (Phil. 2:4) and to prefer one another in honor (Rom 12:10) (McMinn, 1996).…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This book Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity by David Entwistle (2010), talks about the incorporation of Christianity, and psychology. He stated, “Primarily psychology and Christianity are perceived by many people to be in opposition.” The two of them address general questions relating to human experiences and life from different angles. Enwistle explains that, “Christianity is based on the Word of God. Psychology’s foundation is supported empirically. Because psychology is empirically based, it does not allow any space for faith or recognition of the supernatural.” Christianity is based on faith and believes the Bible is the foundation of all truth. David Entwistle explained that, “Psychology uses empirical methods of study while theology studies human interpretations of God’s Word.” Entwistle provided a very detailed look at how these two different ways of viewing human behavior can be integrated. The purpose of this book is to assist its readers to completely understand the integration of these two disciplines. Although they appear to be seen as opponents, David Entwistle gives a thorough look at each of them and creates an avenue in which to show how they go together. A great amount of this book covers the examination of the different models used to comprehend the various views of integration. These models are looked at in a manner to let the reader personally recognize and examine their individual way of viewing integration. This book began by taking an in depth look at how our worldviews influence the way in which we think about everything. This includes psychology and Christianity. Entwistle uses the idea of "worldview" to give details on how we are able to look through our window to decide how we see our view as it relates to the world. According to Entwistle (2010), everybody has…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    4-Mat Review

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although there have been times in history when psychology and theology have worked cooperatively, they have mostly been at odds. Psychology relies primarily on empirical and rational methods; it assumes the world is knowable and predictable. The goal of psychology is to improve life by minimizing suffering and maximizing the positive. On the other hand, theology asserts that the Bible is the ultimate source and guide for faith and practice. In addition…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4-Mat Review Entwistle

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In his book Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity, David N. Entwistle explores the necessity of integrating psychology and Christianity, the worldview issues, philosophical foundations, models of integration and discusses the difficulty in doing so. It is often thought that there are secular jobs, such as a psychologist or counselor, and there are ministry jobs. Entwistle points out that God has gifted each with abilities and those abilities are best used to serve God and others. He further goes on to point out that “all truth is God’s truth” (Entwistle, 2010 p. 13). Therefore, all truth is authored by God.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Christian model of behavior stems from a holistic approach in which God must be in the equation. God designed humans in His likeness as Genesis 1:27 exclaims “So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Researcher David Entwistle builds a case to support the integration of Christian faith and psychology by first making the point by asking the question what has Athens have to do with Jerusalem?(2004). He sets out to answer the by explaining the historical of these two historical and conflicting views. Athens representing the voice of reason and Jerusalem represent the voice of faith (pp. 18-52). The question if Christianity and the discipline of psychology can be integrated seeing that theology depends upon a specific methodology that delineates both the behavioral and physical exploration of human beings.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4 Mat Review

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The integration of psychology and theology has become a hot topic since psychology began to integrate into a new part of society. Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity argue ways that one can embrace psychology into the Christian world. The church has always been a dominant part of society. As Christians we all have precise worldview. Our worldview is based upon the Christian belief system. As Christians we yearn for ways to use our abilities to do good things that please our Lord and Savior.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Bible Among the Myths

    • 2961 Words
    • 12 Pages

    John N. Oswalt has long thought about the issue at hand regarding the bible and it’s relation, if any, to the study of myths. Beginning first in a course at Asbury Theological Seminary and evolving later through studies about the Mediterranean at Brandeis University, Oswalt has intently studied the topic and cultural impact over a significant period of time. This intentional period of study has lead Oswalt to the position posed through this book; “is the religion of the Old Testament essentially similar to, or essentially different from, the religion of its neighbors?” In particular within the contemporary study of both history and myth, does the Bible fit within a particular definition?…

    • 2961 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Integrative Approaches

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The foundation of our worldviews is based on how we were brought up and the society we were raised in. Our worldviews affect everything, the way we live, the way we think and the way we react. This book helps us understand our worldview assumptions and provides a roadmap to determining what we base our assumptions on. We need to have an understanding of Psychology and Christianity if we want to effectively integrate the two. (Entwistle 2010) discusses epistemology, which is the study of knowledge and belief. Epistemology introduces 4 ways of knowing: Internal Dialogue, Interactive, Investigative and Interpreting God’s Word. Epistemology allows us to keep questioning that which we think we know.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Entwistle Book Review

    • 2213 Words
    • 9 Pages

    David Entwistle’s (2010) book, Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity: An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations, and models of integration, opens the reader’s eyes to unexpected possibilities, beginning with the often combative regimes of faith and reason using Tertullian’s symbolism of Athens as the seat of reason and Jerusalem as the seat of faith; which is the basic ongoing battle between science and religion (Entwistle, 2010). What Entwistle addresses is his belief that integration of the disciple of psychology and Christianity is possible, each contributing to the whole allowing effective therapy, where the therapist becomes a type of shepherd that invites the client into the goodness of God and introduces Christ as his savior. Psychology attempts to understand, describe, and diagnose human behavior but Christian theology seeks to understand “what it means to be human” (Entwistle, 2010, p. 3). In the end Entwistle (2010) reoccurring theme throughout the book is that this integration is possible because “all truth is God’s truth” (p. 13). All the reasoning, precise measurements, and descriptives of psychology are possible because of God’s work in creation.…

    • 2213 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays