Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Man and Society

Powerful Essays
2321 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Man and Society
Man and Society Somebody said “The problem of man cannot be solved scientifically without a clear statement of the relationship between man and society”. In the family the individual abandons some of his specific features to become a member of the whole. The life of the family is related to the division of labour according to sex and age, the upbringing of the children and also various moral, legal and psychological relationships. The family is a crucial instrument for the development of personality. It is here that the child first becomes involved in social life, absorbs its values and standards of behaviour, its ways of thought, language and certain value orientations. It is this primary group that bears the major responsibility to society. Through the group the child, as he grows older, enters society. the collectivity as a whole is the main educational force. Here the psychological factors are very important. It is essential that a person should feel himself part of a group at his own wish, and that the group should voluntarily accept him, take in his personality. Everybody performs certain functions in a group. Take, for example, the production team. Here people are joined together by other interests as well as those of production; they exchange certain political, moral, aesthetic, scientific and other values. A group generates public opinion, it sharpens and polishes the mind and shapes the character and will. Through the group a person rises to the level of a personality, a conscious subject of historical creativity. The group is the first shaper of the personality, and the group itself is shaped by society. The unity of man and society. A person's whole intellectual make-up bears the clear imprint of the life of society as a whole. All his practical activities are individual expressions of the historically formed social practice of humanity. The implements that he uses have in their form a function evolved by a society which predetermines the ways of using them. When tackling any job, we all have to take into account what has already been achieved before us. The wealth and complexity of the individual's social content are conditioned by the diversity of his links with the social whole, the degree to which the various spheres of the life of society have been assimilated and refracted in his consciousness and activity. This is why the level of individual development is an indicator of the level of development of society, and vice versa. But the individual does not dissolve into society. He retains his unique and independent individuality and makes his contribution to the social whole: just as society itself shapes human beings, so human beings shape society. The individual is a link in the chain of the generations. His affairs are regulated not only by himself, but also by the social standards, by the collective reason or mind. The true token of individuality is the degree to which a certain individual in certain specific historical conditions has absorbed the essence of the society in which he lives. Consider, for instance, the following historical fact. Who or what would Napoleon Bonaparte have been if there had been no French Revolution? It is difficult or perhaps even impossible to reply to this question. But one thing is quite clear—he would never have become a great general and certainly not an emperor. He himself was well aware of his debt and in his declining years said, "My son cannot replace me. I could not replace myself. I am the creature of circumstances."[1] It has long been acknowledged that great epochs give birth to great men. What tribunes of the people were lifted by the tide of events of the French Revolution— Mirabeau, Marat, Robespierre, Danton. What young, some times even youthful talents that had remained dormant among the people were raised to the heights of revolutionary, military, and organisational activity by the Great October Socialist Revolution. It is sometimes said that society carries the individual as a river carries a boat. This is a pleasant simile, but not exact. An individual does not float with the river; he is the turbulently flowing river itself. The events of social life do not come about by themselves; they are made. The great and small paths of the laws of history are blazed by human effort and often at the expense of human blood. The laws of history are not charted in advance by superhuman forces; they are made by people, who then submit to their authority as something that is above the individual. The key to the mysteries of human nature is to be found in society. Society is the human being in his social relations, and every human being is an individual embodiment of social relations, a product not only of the existing social system but of all world history. He absorbs what has been accumulated by the centuries and passed on through traditions. Modern man carries within himself all the ages of history and all his own individual ages as well. His personality is a concentration of various strata of culture. He is influenced not only by modern mass media, but also by the writings of all times and every nation. He is the living memory of history, the focus of all the wealth of knowledge, abilities, skills, and wisdom that have been amassed through the ages. Man is a kind of super-dense living atom in the system of social reality. He is a concentration of the actively creative principle in this system. Through myriads of visible and invisible impulses the fruit of people's creative thought in the past continues to nourish him and, through him, contemporary culture. Sometimes the relation between man and society is interpreted in such a way that the latter seems to be something that goes on around a person, something in which he is immersed. But this is a fundamentally wrong approach. Society does, of course, exist outside the individual as a kind of social environment in the form of a historically shaped system of relations with rich material and spiritual culture that is independent of his will and consciousness. The individual floats in this environment all his life. But society also exists in the individual himself and could not exist at all, apart from the real activity of its members. History in itself does nothing. Society possesses no wealth whatever. It fights no battles. It grows no grain. It produces no tools for making things or weapons for destroying them. It is not society as such but man who does all this, who possesses it, who creates everything and fights for everything. Society is not some impersonal being that uses the individual as a means of achieving its aims. All world history is nothing but the daily activity of individuals pursuing their aims. Here we are talking not about the actions of individuals who are isolated and concerned only with themselves, but about the actions of the masses, the deeds of historical personalities and peoples. An individual developing within the framework of a social system has both a certain dependence on the whole system of social standards and an autonomy that is an absolutely necessary precondition for the life and development of the system. The measure of this personal autonomy is historically conditioned and depends on the character of the social system itself. Exceptional rigidity in a social system (fascism, for example) makes it impossible or extremely difficult for individual innovations in the form of creative activity in various spheres of life to take place, and this inevitably leads to stagnation. The relationships between the individual and society in history. To return once again to the simile of the river. The history of humankind is like a great river bearing its waters into the ocean of the past. What is past in life does not become something that has never been. No matter how far we go from the past, it still lives to some extent in us and with us. From the very beginning, the character of the man-society relationship changed substantially in accordance with the flow of historical time. The relationship between the individual and a primitive horde was one thing. Brute force was supreme and instincts were only slightly controlled, although even then there were glimpses of moral standards of cooperation without which any survival, let alone development, would have been impossible. In tribal conditions people were closely bound by ties of blood. At that time there were no state or legal relationships. Not the individual but the tribe, the genus, was the law-giver. The interests of the individual were syncretised with those of the commune. In the horde and in tribal society there were leaders who had come to the fore by their resourcefulness, brains, agility, strength of will, and so on. Labour functions were divided on the basis of age and sex, as were the forms of social and other activity. With the development of the socium an ever increasing differentiation of social functions takes place. People acquire private personal rights and duties, personal names, and a constantly growing measure of personal responsibility. The individual gradually becomes a personality, and his relations with society acquire an increasingly complex character. When the society based on law and the state first arose, people were sharply divided between masters and slaves, rulers and ruled. Slave society with its private property set people against one another. Some individuals began to oppress and exploit others. Feudal society saw the emergence of the hierarchy of castes, making some people totally dependent on others. On the shoulders of the common toiler there grew up an enormous parasitic tree with kings or tsars at its summit. This pyramid of social existence determined the rights and duties of its citizens, and the rights were nearly all at the top of the social scale. This was a society of genuflection, where not only the toilers but also the rulers bowed the knee to the dogma of Holy Scripture and the image of the Almighty. The age of the Renaissance was a hymn to the free individual and to the ideal of the strong fully developed human being blazing trails of discovery into foreign lands, broadening the horizons of science, and creating masterpieces of art and technical perfection. History became the scene of activity for the enterprising and determined individual. Not for him the impediments of the feudal social pyramid, where the idle wasted their lives and money, enjoying every privilege, and the toilers were kept in a state of subjugation and oppression. At first came the struggle for freedom of thought, of creativity. This grew into the demand for civil and political freedom, freedom of private initiative and social activity in general. As a result of the bourgeois revolutions that followed, the owners of capital acquired every privilege, and also political power. The noble demand that had been inscribed on the banners of the bourgeois revolutions—liberty, equality and fraternity—turned out to mean an abundance of privileges for some and oppression for others. Individualism blossomed forth, an individualism in which everybody considered himself the hub of the universe and his own existence and prosperity more important than anyone else's. People set themselves up in opposition to other people and to society as a whole. Such mutual alienation is a disease that corrupts the social whole. The life of another person, even one's nearest, becomes no more than a temporary show, a passing cloud. The growing bureaucracy, utilitarianism and technologism in culture considerably narrow the opportunities for human individuality to express and develop itself. The individual becomes an insignificant cog in the gigantic machine controlled by capital. Alienation makes itself felt with particular force. What is alienation? It is the conversion of the results of physical and intellectual activity into forces that get out of human control and, having gained the whip hand, strike back at their own creators, the people. It is a kind of jinn that people summon to their aid and then find themselves unable to cope with. Thus, the state which arose in slave society, became a force that oppressed the mass of the people, an apparatus of coercion by one class over another. The science that people venerate, that brings social progress and is in itself the expression of this progress, becomes in its material embodiment a lethal force that threatens all mankind. How much has man created that exerts a terrible pressure on his health, his mind and his willpower! These supra-personal forces, which are the product of people's joint social activity and oppress them, are the phenomenon known as alienation. The thinkers of the past, who were truly dedicated to the idea of benefiting the working folk, pointed out the dangers of a system governed by the forces of alienation, a system in which some people live at the expense of other people's labour, where human dignity is flouted and man's physical and intellectual powers drained by exploitation. The individual is free where he not only serves as a means of achieving the goals of the ruling class and its party but is himself the chief goal of society, the object of all its plans and provisions. The main condition for the liberation of the individual is the abolition of exploitation of one individual by another, of hunger and poverty, and the reassertion of man's sense of dignity. This was the kind of society of which the utopian socialists and the founders of scientific socialism dreamed. In contrast to bourgeois individualism, socialist collectivism starts off from the interests of the individual— not just the chosen few but all genuine working people. Socialism everywhere requires striking, gifted personalities with plenty of initiative. A person with a sense of perspective is the highest ideal of the creative activity of the socialist society.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    It is suggested that the structure approach to family is less important than the functional approach to family. Cheal defined the structure of family as grouping of system’s parts, such as the family roles of mother, father and child (Cheal, D. 2002:162). For the approach of structure of family, the kind of family members, the relationships, positions or roles, are consisted within the family and the members of family are interacted but the activities of the family or the consequences of their activities are not included. For instance, it included the main roles of the parents in family might be transited values to child, to let child get ready to go to school and provided food for them. Still, it tends to be insignificant for social scientists to challenge. Therefore, they emphasis on family functions more (Cheal, D. 2002:7).…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    MACRO AND MINI SOCIOLOGY

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The family is one primary agent of socialization and the most important. Plays an important part in all kinds of cultures and ethnicities. The family nucleus raises their members by inculcating their specific norms and values, with the expected results that its members will better adapt to their society. Teaching them to socialize, integrate and be unique individuals in society. Yet, there are other institutions that play a role in the socialization of its family members such as children. Among them are day cares and, social activity clubs and summer camps just to name a few.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, according to Macionis (2004) the term family is defined as a social institution found in all societies that unite people in cooperative groups to oversee the bearing and raising of children. Same author also discusses several theoretical approaches have been identified that identifies the family as a form of social institution and how the family unit interconnect with other social institutions within any given society. According to the Structural-Functional Analysis for example, the family serves as a unit that perform many vital tasks which include socialization, regulation of sexual activity (reproduction), social placement and emotional support. According to the Social-Conflict Analysis, the family unit contributes to the perpetuation in inequality solely based on race, class, gender, gender and ethnicity. Finally, Symbolic-Interaction Analysis focuses on the changing dynamics of any family structure and how it evolves over the life course of an individual.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay examines and explains how groups develop and function. Groups are a fundamental part of our lives from social to professional, from large to small, depending on their particular environment.…

    • 2097 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man vs Society

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In today’s world, days are sometimes based upon whether one will be accepted into society by their actions, but for many, it’s about standing out from the rest. Though these are two completely different ideas, under certain circumstances, both ideas can become equally important. For many, they will do everything possible to make a difference. In 1955, during one of the largest racial segregations, an African American woman named Rosa Parks became a legacy. Despite the harsh laws, she stood her ground and refused to give up her seat to a white man on a public bus (Wikipedia.com). She definitely made a statement that resulted in a nationwide controversy. By doing so, Rosa Park’s actions became inspiration for all African Americans who have dealt with the same pains of being treated unfairly. Thus, she became a leader and a hero for being one of the many who put an end to the racial discrimination. For standing up for what she believed and for the sake of others, Rosa Parks made a difference in the world today. Because one person went against all of society, she was able to make the world a better place. With determination and courage, Rosa Parks demonstrates how far anyone can succeed and make a difference against all odds. But for others, some were never given the chance. In Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Robinson, an African American man, was accused of abusing and raping Mayella Ewell, a white woman. But because he was of different skin color and at the scene of the incident, he was immediately to blame. Though an honest man, there was not much Robinson could do…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Groups are made u of individuals with varying personalities, backgrounds and ideas. For a group to work well a bond needs to be developed. Every group needs a leader and each member should feel a sense of belonging, a reason and purpose for their presence in the group. Each and every group experience will have a different lesson that can be learned whether good or bad.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Families are cells of a society which make it and empower it. Family is the place which gives children love, attention, and prepares them for living in a big society .family is the place which let a man and a woman share their love, respect and receive their solace .it is the base of each society and it shapes characteristics of a society. by changing generations, families had changed too. In this paper I tried to contrast today and past families according to values, and structure.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It should be clear from the foregoing that the statement that manproduces himself in no way implies some sort of Promethean vision ofthe solitary individual. Man's self-production is always, and ofnecessity, a social enterprise. Men together produce a humanenvironment, with the totality of its socio-cultural andpsychological formations. None of these formations may be understoodas products of man's biological constitution, which, as indicated,provides only the outer limits for human productive activity. Just asit is impossible for man to develop as man in isolation, so it isimpossible for man in isolation to produce a human environment.Solitary human being is being on the animal level (which, of course,man shares with other animals). As soon as one deserves phenomenathat are specifically human, one enters the realm of the social.Man's specific humanity and his sociality are inextricablyintertwined. Homo sapiens is always, and in the same measure,homo socius.…

    • 2550 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociological Perspectives

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As a factor, family plays a crucial role in the development and socialisation of an individual. It teaches them the norms and the social role that they will be expected to fulfil. Murdock (1949), a functionalist, described family as “a universal social institution found in all societies”…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Geisha Outline Claim

    • 3783 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Every human society is based on the family. The family is the smallest and probably the most fundamental social institution in the human community. There are rules that define family membership, lineage and inheritance as well as codes of behavior among the members. In every society the principles and the norms exist, but the reality is reflected only partially. Historically, the family was the most encompassing agency of social welfare to individual members of the group. Health care, protection (from the hostile external environment), education and training for survival, amusement and entertainment, production and consumption had been the functions performed by the family…

    • 3783 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Family is supposed to be the foundation of values and guidelines for us to suit in society, but as time goes by we see the decrease of the accurate purpose of this affiliation. Nowadays, family is one of the main causes of the issues in society. Individuals behave just as they have been taught to and act with the values they have learned. Crimes among us encouraged by feelings like hatred, anger, or sadness are usually result of a bad foundation. However, this could be a relative problem, in where culture proposes a model of family. As an example, family in Asia can have a different perspective than family in America of how it should be consisted of. Nonetheless, they all lead to the same responsibility of guiding each individual along their lives to be the person they need to be for this…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Man vs. Society

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Society excludes, torments, and sometimes kills people simply because of their religion. We might not always see it or hear it, but it’s there. Religious persecution is everywhere. It is in our schools, it is in our government, it is engrained in our society. Naturally people persecute and torment those who are not like them, be them Muslim, Mormon, Hindu, or even Christian.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Family life is the most basic of the social institutions. In one way or another each individual person has had an interaction with family and therefor has in one way affected them. The family has numerous manifest functions that will affect the individual. One of these…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The origins of human nature and society are distinguished and are different throughout history. The origin of human nature depends upon the period involved. Early anthropologists based human nature on their own experiences of living because no written records existed as to how a society formed, while modern anthropologists have the luxury of using written records and current living situations to develop their own notion of a society and human nature. However, human nature cannot be defined by a particular set of criteria, because it embodies characteristics that are associated with thinking and feeling that humans should naturally have. It is not clear as to what exact characteristics humans should naturally have because society originations differ throughout causing everybody to think and exhibit qualities that are distinct among their origins. Many scholars have struggled with the classifications societies have brought forth, forcing them to struggle with the idea of where human nature originated and how such classifications are even brought forth in a society.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis

    • 345 Words
    • 1 Page

    Family is the basic components of the society. And the parents are the most important source of youth’s behavior, which effect to their outlook in life. A home is where a family lives. It may be alternated to the word ‘house’ but a house is more appropriately referring to the material structure, whereas ‘home’ refers to the intangible things that bind together the family members. The Family is an essential factor for a human’s whole-being, everything about a man, his background, attitude, all of his achievements, his honor and dignity, relies on the structure of the family a man lives in with. A family is composed of a father a mother and their offspring, bonded by their love for each other. Here in the modern age a family could be two things, complete or broken. A broken family is believed to be a cause of a child’s mislead in life, some people give it as the main reason of the rebellious and unclear acts of a person. Meanwhile school is another factor which molds us on becoming a good person. Separation, family problems and misunderstandings from the family are the major causes of single - parent or broken families. Good relationship of parents to their siblings may build a strong relationship and a strong relationship with their family can develop the behavior of a person. The behavior of a person can also affect by the relationship of their family. A person who comes from broken family will have different behavior on their social well-being. The parents have a special role in the behavior of a person. Here in the Philippines, most of the students come from broken family with a single parent. Many of them feel sad. Sometimes they can’t explain to their self or to others why they feel that way. When they saw a happy family they feel depressed moods seems to arise from within. They depression feels unpleasant, inconvenient, and unacceptable. Some of the VMA Global College students come from broken family as well. This research…

    • 345 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics