Preview

Malpractice Tort In Scenario 2: Negligence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Malpractice Tort In Scenario 2: Negligence
Tort Actions The most prevalent tort in scenario 2 is negligence. The first act of negligence would be the glass that was found in Anna’s food that caused her injury. The second negligent act was the waiter’s decision to carry a flaming dish through the restaurant without announcing his presence. The restaurant owner’s negligent decision to not install an emergency exit other than a revolving door entrance caused an elderly woman to be trampled and caused several other patrons to suffer from smoke inhalation and burns. Anna also has a medical malpractice tort because when she was taken to the hospital to have surgery on her mouth a hospital mistake resulted in her leg being amputated instead.
Potential Plaintiffs The potential plaintiffs in this case are Anna, the elderly woman that was trampled, the waiter who was burned, and the restaurant patrons that suffered smoke inhalation and burns.
Possible Defendants
…show more content…
The waiter is a possible defendant because he failed to announce his presence and was responsible for tossing his apron onto another tablecloth starting a larger blaze. The restaurant owner is another possible defendant because they failed to provide a proper emergency exit. Defendants of the malpractice tort are both the doctor who performed the wrong surgery on Anna and the hospital in which the mix up took place. The surgeon failed to ensure he was performing the right procedure on the right patient and the hospital because they failed to have standard operating procedures in place that would prevent such a horrible

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jane Chambers, filed a personal injury action alleging negligence by the defendant, Giorgio's Grill. She alleges that she slipped and fell on a wet napkin, breaking her leg. The defendant denied any negligence.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According the rule of reasonable person under the standard of care, I can definitely foresee the injury coming. Her injury could have prevented if the landlord has maintained the fire alarm on the first floor. Due to the malfunction of fire alarm on the first floor, Smith realized the fire after it started on the first floor ten minutes later. Since the malfunctioned alarm takes away smith’s chance of escaping from escaping from the…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scarlet Rose Case Summary

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of Scarlet Rose her claim for damages done to her and bills brought up for damages that occur to her because of her slip and fall accident at the Nickel & Dime store on January 31, 2001. Ms. Rose wants compensation for the accident at Nickel & Dime and her medical bills paid. Ms. Rose entered Nickel & Dime and as she was walking and she slipped over a box in the middle of the isle that an employee had placed there. Ms. Rose says that she did not see the box as a rack was blocking her view. She was in a little hurry, but not distracted.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conclusion: It is not likely that Samantha will be awarded damages for her injuries because she cannot show proof that the grocery store had any knowledge of the hazardous spill on the…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Deb's Case

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main question here in this case is who is liable, negligent and damages. Deb is driving her car when it is involved in an accident with a car driven by Abe. A few moments after the first crash, a car driven by Ann hits the two cars disabled from the first crash. Cal, a passenger in Abe’s car has a minor injury to his head from the first crash but serious injury to his knees and legs from Ann’s subsequent driving into the first crash. Cal is taken to the hospital where Doctor informs him, correctly, that he will lose both legs unless he consents to an immediate particular type of surgery which may save his legs. Doctor does not inform Cal that this type of surgery, if successful, will mean that his repaired knees will need artificial…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samantha Smith Case

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In our case Samantha Smith had an accident in a retail store where she slipped on shampoo that had leaked from the bottle and suffered a broken hip. In her suite against the store Samantha claims the store is at fault; however, the store claims that Samantha failed to exercise due care while shopping and that she is partially to blame for the accident. The three articles below pertain to our case in one way or another.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mary is cutting weeds at her home. She is unable to trim some weeds she finds, because they grew between the rocks, so she removes the protective guard on the weed trimmer and trims the weeds. There are no warnings on the weed trimmer advising against removing the guard. She hits a rock, which is thrown to the side, hitting her neighbor in the eye and causing permanent damage. What kind of tort claim does the neighbor have? Who are the possible defendants?…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ms Liebeck spilled her coffee on herself which caused her to get burned. She sustained 3rd degree burns because the coffee was brewed at a higher temperature than other restaurants. The case was ruled in favor of Ms. Liebeck. The jury declared McDonald’s negligent because their coffee was found to be 20 degrees hotter than it should have been. McDonald’s had received many complaints about their coffee being too hot and failed to do anything about it. So their actions were considered to be reckless because they did not warn their customers about the temperature of the…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aspirin Case

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The patient experiences intestinal bleeding and has a significant chronic disease. The combined effects of the bleeding and the disease permanently disable the patient, so he can no longer work. Due to the disabling nature of the injure there is a potential case for malpractice based on tor…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liebeck V Mcdonald's

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After being taken to the hospital, Mrs. Liebeck underwent skin grafting to correct the third-degree burns covering six percent of her body. She was hospitalized for eight days and after she was released, she had to undergo two years of treatment. Mrs. Liebeck tried to settle with McDonald’s corporation by seeking $20,000 to cover her medical expenses, but the corporation only offered her $800. After McDonald’s refused to raise their offer, Mrs. Liebeck filed a suit.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    9. What is HACCP? What does it stand for? When are CCP’s used and how?…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Negligence law states that a person or an organization is generally liable when they negligently injure others.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reasearch Tote Case

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The “McDonalds Coffee Spill” is the most widely known tort case in the country (Liebeck v. McDonalds). The case was tried in Albuquerque, New Mexico in August 1993. When the case first hit the media circuit the news painted a picture of a clumsy old lady who spilled coffee all over herself while driving or riding in car, sued McDonalds, and was warded 2.7 million in punitive damages from a sympathic jury (O’Brien, Shafner, Stuart, Kelly & Morris, 1999). Further details of the case would surface 6 months to a year later with information that showed that this case was far more than trivial.…

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Worker Safety Case Study

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How do you think the restaurant's management could have prevented the incident from happening? What could managers do to create a safer kitchen environment?…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Case

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    . Identify and explain the four elements of proof necessary for a plaintiff to prove a…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays