Preview

Magnetic Toys Can Hurt

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1105 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Magnetic Toys Can Hurt
MEGA Brands is a global organization, extending to over 100 countries. This organization’s mission is to nurture creativity, whether it is in a kid or an adult. It distributes a range of toys, puzzles, and craft-based products worldwide but enjoys greatest success in North America, where Mega Bloks is one of the top 10 toy brands. In 2003, MAGNETIX® products were introduced to consumers and were a hit. Kids were engaging in building the construction sets for hours at a time. However, this popularity would not last long, when a mother claimed that her kid choked on a magnet that fell from the toy and died. In this paper I am going to concentrate on how this incident and others could have been prevented by defining the problems apparent in the case, analyzing the situation, and presenting solutions taken by the company to clear their name from these unforeseen events.
First off as an executive of this company I would bring up concerns to the CEO about numerous other incidents that occurred after the fatality of that little boy and its effect on Mega Brands shares collapsing. The consequences also could become much worse for the company if a child swallowed more than one magnet. The magnets in the toys are powerful and could rip through tissue in a child’s digestive system. Complex surgery would be needed and complications could follow.
If the CEO refuses to listen to my concerns, then I would look to the government and public to instill pressure on the CEO. After several incidents were in fact reported, Mega Brands subsequently took voluntary action recalling all construction sets, except newer Magnetix sets sold since March 31, 2006, that were age-labeled 6+ and sets that contained the following caution label:
"CAUTION: Do not ingest or inhale magnets.
Attraction of magnets in the body may cause serious injury and require immediate medical care" (Commission, 2007).
According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, who investigated the incidents with



Cited: Bakalar, N. (2008, February 12). Toy Magnet Swallowed? No Problem. Two? Call 911. Retrieved from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/12/health/12magn.html?_r=1&ref=magnetsandmagnetism Birkeland, C. P. (2006, May 31). Toy Recall: Magnetix Magnet Building Sets by RoseArt. Retrieved from Parentdish: http://www.parentdish.com/2006/03/31/toy-recall-magnetix-magnet-building-sets-by-roseart/ Commission, U. C. (2007, April 19). Magnetix Magnetic Building Set Recall Expanded Serious Injuries Continue to be Reported to CPSC. Retrieved from NEWS from CPS: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml07/07164.html Consumer 's Union. (2008, May 15). Retrieved from STILL NOT SAFE: NEW RECALLS UNDERLINE NEED FOR STRONG HAZARDOUS PRODUCT LEGISLATION: http://www.consumersunion.org/pdf/StillNotSafe.pdf Magnetix Product Improvements. (n.d.). Retrieved from MEGA Brands: http://www.megabrands.com/en/customerservice/recallinfo/magnetix/magnetix_products_improvements.php?menuid=2 Mega Brands on track to recovery: CEO. (2011, March 18). Retrieved from National Post: http://www.nationalpost.com/related/topics/Mega+Brands+track+recovery/4461561/story.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mr. Lake Essay Example

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Research from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission indicates that defective or unsafe products cause 29.4 million injuries and 21,400 deaths each year. You or your child may be injured by something seemingly harmless or something you use everyday, such as a hair dryer, toaster, baby chair, toy, iron, coffee maker, air conditioner, car, hand tool or even your clothing. Product liability law gives consumers the ability to sue for and recover damages from manufacturers, distributors and vendors for injuries resulting from accidents caused by products.”…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    human resourcs-task 2

    • 2357 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Following the recently identified problem with the quality assurance of one of the companies toys included in the toys collection included in the elementary toy collection, that is the metal whistle, the company has come to high alert regarding the possible implications that such a discovery may impose to the company. The amount of lead found in the metal whistles was slightly above those required by the U.S. regulation for children seven years and below. With a large shipment of the toy whistle waiting to be shipped to South America and the cost of reproducing the toys estimated at $100,000, drastic measures are required in order to ensure that the problem is resolved effectively and efficiently. This paper looks at different decisions to fix the issue of lead in the toys.…

    • 2357 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Based in California, Mattel, Inc. designed, manufactured, and marketed a broad variety of toy products. The company’s core product lines included Barbie fashion dolls, Hot Wheels die- cast vehicles, Fisher-Price preschool toys along with Disney toys and games like Scrabble (Johnson, 2010). Summer of 2007, Mattel, a global leader in toy manufacturing was faced with a tough challenge of restoring their consumer confidence following several recalls of their toys made in China. Mattel known for possessing the gold standard of testing and safety of its products came under scrutiny for several infractions with their toys. One of which had unacceptable lead levels in the paint and another contained a magnet that could un-attach and potentially harm a child. Mattel had strict requirement for its contract suppliers, which were subject to inspection by independent auditors (Baron, 2013). These issues clearly feel through the cracks or where random isolated incidents. Nonetheless, in order to achieve their normally high standards, Mattel needs to establish a direct relationship with vendors who manufacture the raw materials for their toys and set safety guidelines. Mattel has had to assess whether its current policies and procedures were sufficient to ensure safety. In addition to procedures such as factory audits and inspections, technology could be used to mitigate certain risks (Baron, 2013). Clearly Mattel does not have a sufficiently tight quality control procedure to compensate for the risks of outsourcing to Chinese subcontractors. Design flaws are also a major issue. Although the company responded to the crisis quickly Mattel still faces a number of problems, including significant costs associated with the recalls and new monitoring systems, potential lawsuits and a hit to its reputation.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: {text:bookmark-start} Consumer Product Safety Commission (2005, January). Regulated Products Handbook. Retrieved October 4th, 2008, from www.cpsc.gov/businfo/8001.pdf+CPSC+regulated+products+handbook&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1 {text:bookmark-end} {text:bookmark-start} Jennings, M. M. (2006). Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment (7th ed.). Mason, Ohio: Rob Dewey. {text:bookmark-end}…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question 2: If this is the route the company wants to take, then what’s the best way to purchase the magnets and packaging?…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not Until a Boy Died” the beginning of a worldwide crisis within the homes of small children. “Please do something, Grigsby remembers urging. When the plastic building sets broke, she told the operator, they shed powerful magnets inside her northern Indiana preschool. Grigsby didn't see the loose magnets, not much bigger than baby aspirin” (Callahan 2017 para 2). The fear in this statement started the first real outreaches towards the toy corporations and their dangerous toys they release. Magnetix is a magnetic construction toy consisting of a combination of plastic building pieces containing embedded neodymium magnets, and steel bearing balls that can be connected to form geometric shapes and structures. Thirty days went by, then another…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Lakes Case Study

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the mid-1990’s there is growing worldwide pressure, especially from environmentalists, for us to stop making the lead additive via our subsidiary, Octel Associates, because a scientific study in the 1960’s found that lead caused brain damage in children, respiratory problems in the elderly, and damaged the air and soil quality. Lead additives have been banned in the U.S. and other developed countries, but are still used in developing countries. We have publically admitted that our lead additive is our biggest money maker, that it is extremely harmful, and that we are a committed to environmental responsibility. We have stated that many of the chemicals that we produce were replacements for many existing chemicals that are far more harmful and noxious than lead. Environmentalists have suggested that we contribute some of Octel’s profits towards subsidizing a more rapid transition away from TEL.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing that uses magnetic fields is the electric motor, which is used in many household appliances, such as electric fans, microwave ovens, and other small appliances. In this instance the electric motor has an electric current, giving it also this magnetic field.…

    • 3439 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Build a Bear Workshop

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Kumar, K. (2011, Dec. 24). In Build-A-Bear issues third toy recall this year. (sect. 5,6,&7). Retrieved Feb. 8, 2011, from http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/build-a-bear-issues-third-toy-recall-this-year/article_c752e2eb-668a-5c31-8130-4059a64355bc.html…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Game Simulation

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first decision that had to be made was about a product already on the market that was contaminated yet only put a small percentage of users at a low risk. After narrowing the possibilities down to two solutions, the choice was made to warn customers of the potential dangers but to continue selling. Originally, this scenario had a familiar ring and the Ford Pinto case came into mind. (DeGeorge, 2005). Was our company about to do the same thing and knowingly put thousands of lives in jeopardy? Our initial decision had been to recall everything in order to avoid any chances of a lawsuit or accidental deaths. After several debates, though, it was determined that this was a different situation being that cars are luxuries and medicines were necessities. Since this particular product complied with FDA standards, no one saw any reason to pull it from the market.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It should also be noted that the PIP Company is not alone in this scare. The firms who sold the industrial chemicals to them might take a part of the responsibility because they knew that they were selling industrial silicone to a…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mattel Toy Recalls

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Whether timely enough or not, Mattel catered to it’s customers in the recall. By making the recall and releasing a statement explaining the procedure, they risked their reputation at the stake of their customers safety. I believe that they also catered to the Consumer Product safety Commission who I assume would have enforced the recall had they not co-operated. I believe that they also catered to some of their other stakeholders in the recall such as the owners and shareholders and employees. While the implications of the recall may have negative effects on these parties in the short run perhaps they felt that they were minimising these implications in the long run by acting when they did. Had they waited any longer or been forced to make the recall the reputational implications may have been worse.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, the Consumer Product Safety Commission allows American-based companies to export products, which have been deemed unsafe here. In 2006, a California company exported 16,520 art sets, which were deemed unsafe. A company in Miami also exported to Jamaica 5,184 unsafe wax crayons. From 1993 to 2006, the CPSC received 1,031 requests from companies to export products deemed unsafe for American consumer. Of the 1,031 requests received, 991 were approved for exportation. In the US, when we receive products that have been imported with poisonous lead, GHB and other…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two separate reasons why Mattel recalled 19 million toys from August to September of 2007. The fact that both recalls occurred at the same time makes this the biggest recall in the company’s history. The first reason was some of the toys Mattel manufactured were found to be coated with lead paint which if ingested is a potent neurotoxin. The…

    • 4195 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Types of Magnets

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Objects having magnetic field is called as magnets. Normally magnets are of two types- Permanent magnets and Electro magnets. Permanent magnets are those magnets which occur in nature and do not depend upon external source for their magnetic field. On the other hand electromagnets are those magnets which use electric current to generate magnetic field.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays