Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Process

Topics: Magnetic field, Magnetism, Magnetic flux Pages: 8 (2408 words) Published: October 27, 2009

S NoMajorPage No
2Process details1
3Mechanism of Material removal5
4Process Parameters Analysis6

Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (MAF) Process

Harry P. Coats first patented MAF in 1938. Although US originate this idea, most of later period development is done by USSR + Bulgaria. Japanese explore the technology for polishing purpose. Other countries in this field are: India, CIS, England, France, and Germany etc.

Process details:

In MAP, w/p is kept between the two magnets & the air gap in-between the w/p & the magnet is filled with Magnetic Abrasive Particles (MAPs). The MAPs joined to each other, along the lines of magnetic force and form a Flexible Magnetic Abrasive Brush. The brush behaves like a multi-point cutting tool for finishing process. The vibrational, rotary & axial motion is imparted to the w/p to enhance the performance of finishing operation

For demonstration, there are three setups commonly used. These are: 1.External contour of cylindrical workpiece: the systematic diagram are as follow:

The process principle of magnetic abrasive finishing is shown in fig. The magnetic abrasives are joined to each other; magnetically in-between magnetic poles ‘N’ & ‘S’ along the lines of magnetic forces, this imparts flexibility of magnetic brushes. Flexibility to brush means it ability to modify itself as per workpiece contours. When a cylindrical workpiece; with rotatory and translatory motions; is inserted, the surface and edge finishing are performed by these magnetic abrasives brushes.

The magnetic field polishing showing the two-dimensional magnetic field distribution in the finishing zone of the process. The magnetic abrasive particles form a brush around the workpiece linking the N & s poles. The magnetic flux density is stronger around the nonmagnetic workpiece (along the magnetic brushes) than through the workpiece. The magnetic abrasive at position “A” in fig. is affected by the magnetic forces represented by the following equations:

Fx= VCH *∂H/∂X
FY= VCH *∂H/∂Y

V=volume of magnetic abrasive particle,
C= susceptibility of the particle
H= magnitude of magnetic field strength at point “A”
X & Y are coordinate points fixed at A,
and ∂H/∂X, ∂H/∂Y are gradient of magnetic field strength in X and Y directions.

From above equations it is evident that the magnetic forces Fx, FY are proportional to the volume of the magnetic abrasive particles, the susceptibility of the particle, the magnetic field strength and its gradient. If the gradients are not equal to zero then magnetic abrasive particles are pushed toward the work surface. The magnetic force FY actuates the magnetic abrasive particles to take part in the surface finishing of the workpiece. In addition, the force Fx is acting on the abrasive grain in the rotating tangential direction of the work surface by cutting and frictional action. The runoff of the abrasive grains from the working zone is prevented by the FY. From the above formula if X is non-zero the magnetic force will not act, if ∂H/∂X, ∂H/∂Y is equal to zero. Thus both susceptibility and magnetic field gradients are important in this operation. The larger values of magnetic strength gradients; forces the abrasive grains to move towards the working zone thus preventing separation and splashing of the abrasive grains from the working zone. The magnetic flux density is stronger around the non magnetic workpiece ( along the magnetic brushes) than through the workpiece

2.Internal contour of hollow cylindrical workpiece:
3.Flat surfaces:

Let’s have a look on the basic functional elements of MAF. These are: 1.Magnetic Abrasives Particles (MAPs): MAPs are made up of ferromagnetic material (e.g.. iron powder=300 mesh size i.e.51.4m) and abrasive grains (e.g.Al2O3 =600 mesh size=25.7m, SiC, Diamond powder). Generally ferromagnetic particles size is...

References: 1. Jain R.K & Jain V.K. “Abrasive Fine Finishing Process-A Review”. Vol.2 No.1, 1999.
2. Jain V.K, Kumar Prashant, Behera P.K, Jayswal S.C. “Effect of working gap & circumferential speed on the performance of magnetic abrasive finishing process”. Wear 250 (2001) 384-390.
3. Kremen G.Z, Elsayed E.A, Ribeiro J.L. “Machining time estimation for magnetic abrasive processes”. Int. J. Prod.,1994,vol.32,No.12,2817-2825
4. Kremen G.Z, Elsayed E.A, Rafalovich V.L. “Machining time estimation for magnetic abrasive processes”. “Mechanism of material removal in the magnetic abrasive process and the accuracy of machining”. Int. J. Prod., 1994, vol.32, No.12, 2829-2838.
5. M. Fox, Agrawal, T. Shinmura, R.Komanduri(1),Oklahoma State University,Stillwater,OK,USA. “Magnetic Abrasive Finishing of Rollers”.
Jan 11, 1994.
6. Takeo Shinmura, Toshio Aizawa. “Study on a New Finishing Process of Fine
Ceramics by Magnetic Abrasives Machining”. Int. H. Japan Soc. Pre. Eng., Vol.-
28, No.-2, June 1994.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Optimization of Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Process Essay
  • Essay on Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (Maf)
  • Magnetic Abrasive Finishing of Thick Cylinder Tube Sus 304 Essay
  • Abrasive Wheel Essay
  • Finishing Essay
  • Global Abrasives Market 2014-2018 Essay
  • Abrasive Flow Machining Research Paper
  • Abrasive jet machining Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free