Preview

Machiavelli's The Prince

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
101 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli's The Prince
Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince examines how to acquire and maintain power of a nation. Machiavelli states that nations are either republics or principalities. The four types of principalities are hereditary, new, mixed and ecclesiastical. Hereditary principalities occur when the prince inherits the nation from his ancestors. Hereditary states experience fewer difficulties compared to newer states because they are accustomed to the family of the prince. New Principalities are acquired either by the power of others, one’s own power, luck, or ability. New Principalities are either accustomed to the rule of a prince or was a free state. When a prince conquers a free state it threatens the people’s lifestyle and customs. Therefore, the people…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A good leader is one who can stand up against the norm and take risks to uphold their state. According to Machiavelli, in his book The Prince, this includes taking actions that are not favored by the majority. Though Machiavelli was born on May 3rd, 1469 and only wrote his book in 1513, his ideas were so significant that they apply even to contemporary leaders. Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, is facing situations that can either prove her strength as a leader or set the European Union on a road to destruction. On top of dealing with the major Greek debt crisis, she has been faced with the task of deciding how to handle the Syrian refugees. Using the examples and analysis provided by Machiavelli, Merkel’s best plan would be to pressure…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a significant analysis of Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince. This book explores multiple concepts on leadership and governance for a Prince to legislate on his road to success. Therefore, I will bring a compelling conclusion on how Russian President Vladimir Putin is a modern Machiavelli. To get a full understanding towards Niccolo Machiavelli’s political theory, we must first examine what’s managed to inspire his view of an ideal government. In the book, The Prince, Machiavelli introduces insightful claims on how the Roman Empire’s legitimacy brought a secure and stable society. In fact, presenting the Roman Empire’s platform helped the reader to thoroughly understand Machiavelli’s political theory regarding governance and the…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question of whether to be a loved or feared leader can make a person question on which viable choice is the most suitable for a leader. The Prince, written by 14th century Italian writer Niccoli Machiavelli answers this question (in chapter 17), the concept of whether to be feared or love is answered by Machiavelli, and that is fear. The answer of why fear is the better option is detailed as a set of guidelines which come in the form of authority, public emotion, and logical reasoning, stated by Machiavelli that to be a good (not a kind one) must be both ruthless but reasonable. A ruler cannot be too kind, less they be taken advantage of or to cruel, and be killed for punishing those that follow them, to become a good ruler they have to…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln once said “Any man can stand up against adversity, to see a mans true character give him power.” There are many wasy to obtain power, most of which involve some less than honest actions. Machiavelli was a noble in Italy during a time of unstability. As such he wrote a guide on how to be an effective leader, this guide was titled “The Prince”. One of the main themes of this was that the end justifies the means, that you could and should do whatever is necessary in order to reach the desiered result.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Niccolo Machiavelli, in his first chapter of “The Prince,” princedoms, states can be either republics or princedoms and these last ones can be either acquired new which I suppose by conquest or power, or they could be inherited by a prince’s ancestors. The 1500s were still times where there were many kings and princes all over europe and the world. But it was also a time where many republics were born, or they were young and growing republics. When Machiavelli said “...and he who acquires them does so either by his own arms or by the arms of others, and either by good fortune or by merit” to me, this means that princes--or mercenaries since it says “..or by the arms of others..” --had to fight for these lands, which they could only conquer if they were lucky or by the effort they put into their conquests.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foundation of Machiavellian thinking is that man is basically selfish by nature, hence comes its conclusions.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s work called The Prince he brings up several life style choices that are very controversial even to this day. In his chapter 17, he labeled “Cruelty and Mercy: Is It Better to be Feared or the Reverse?” brings up a major controversial issue among modern leaders. Several leaders come to mind when thinking of using love to govern and using fear to govern. Some leaders use it in a good way and others not so much. But which is better? Did Machiavellie have a preference? In his work, he mentions, “I say that every sensible prince wishes to be considered merciful and not cruel.” (ch.17 p1) So it seems as though Machiavelli did have a preference but did it always work out in life is the question.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In an era of continental invasion, the problem of ensuring political stability within the context of European realpolitik is addressed in Machiavelli’s The Prince. Niccolo Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469 and grew up in Florence, which was a humanist city-state right in the center of the Renaissance. Machiavelli’s father, as a Tuscan, who was both an attorney and humanist, focused heavily on his education hired private tutors to teach Machiavelli. According to his father, Machiavelli, like other Tuscans, was a bright individual who was steeped in classical history while growing up, learned Latin at the age of seven, and later wrote his own compositions in Latin1. Moreover, Machiavelli read Cicero’s Philippics and Livy’s history, both of which influenced him greatly. Upon the fall of the Medici family in 14942, France realized how easy it was to take over these city-states because of Florence’s lack of standing army. Due to the support of France, Medici’s rule of Florence fell and Florence, under the rule of Machiavelli, becomes a Republic until 1512. From this point onwards, France continues to act like a shadow that hung over Italian politics until Florence allying with Spain eventually drove them out.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian statesman and political philosopher. He lived in Florence, Italy during the 1400’s. During that time period the country of Italy was divided into states which had their own leaders, but controlled by a king. Greatest leaders were needed during the time in order to develop the states and the country. Machiavelli’s theory was that man needs to be a perfect leader to control men,…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli, in Chapters 15 of The Prince, explains that nature doesn’t allow perfection in any human being. This leads him to the conclusion that princes should avoid qualities that may hindrance their abilities to rule even if they are considered ‘good’, under which generosity can be grouped as. He speaks further in detail in the next chapter, when he says generosity is a ‘dangerous practice’. He explains that if a prince were to act too generous it would lead to having a reputation for it. This would cause increased taxes all over the prince’s realm, a depleted treasury, and a lower approval by his subjects as a result over all. This lack of loyalty from subjects would…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Around 1513 Niccolo Machiavelli while writing "The Prince" would not be considered a theologian. When thinking of Machiavelli many people confuse him together with the names of rulers who have abused his writings. It also seems other people confuse Machiavelli with the rapper who took his name. Either- way people confuse Machiavelli it seems they fail to look at his true message, bettering the state and the greater good. Machiavelli may seem evil to some but his political theory properly applied is optimal for founding a state, establishing and then maintaining order.…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the passage from The Prince, Machiavelli discusses the idea of leaders coming into power through “popular favour”, where in order to maintain this, they must ensure that the people feel as though they are not oppressed. If one is starting their reign with the support of the public, this leaves them with the responsibility of keeping the people involved in their political decisions and maintain a democracy instead of a dictatorship . This comes into context through Machiavelli’s political background, as he had worked for the government, and later dedicated The Prince to Lorenzo de’ Medici, the ruler of Florence. The Medici family had a longstanding succession of rulers, with Lorenzo coming into rule in 1469, with the majority support from…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout history many rulers and princes have strived to become great and be better than the one before him. Machiavelli states, “Therefor it is necessary for a prince, who wishes to maintain himself, to learn how not to be good.” (Page 523) Clearly, the author has points that revel his outlook on being a successful prince and how not to be. Machiavelli believes that the ruling prince should be the sole authoritian determining every aspect of the state. However, Machiavelli did not believe that a prince should mistreat his citizens, as stated by Machiavelli, “I say that every prince must desire to be considered merciful and not cruel.” There will be challenges that the Prince will face and have the responsibility of making his state contempt to avoid war. People are generally self-absorbed, despite what they may perceive. They might be trustworthy, but can turn in adverse times. If man has ambition, nothing will compromise that trust, but the issue lies in knowing that most people are comfortable with the way things are, so therefore they do not seek…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays