Machiavelli Vs Hobbes Essay

Machiavelli as well as Hobbes have different views but also had similar ones. Machiavelli was a man that was interested in the perseverance of the Prince rather than that of the regular people. On the other hand Hobbes was looking out for the well-being of the whole community. When we look at both we can see what they mean and how it is still relevant to today’s politics. There is also a third person to look at and compare with Machiavelli and Hobbes, which is Rousseau. Each of the men listen above has their own philosophical idea for politics. Whether we ought for a ruler or a government we can all learn from what was written decades ago and put it to use in our politics today. Machiavelli was a man that thought humans were always savages. He built his theory by making men think that they needed someone to guide them in order to have a good living. He went on to talk about how men in his case, the Prince, should seek things for his own preservation. Whetever he does it must be to keep himself in power and to protect himself from enemies and others around him. He foes on to state how a Prince should look nobel but not be nobel. Have people who support him around himself for protection but not count in them for your needs. Macxhiavelli saw virtue as a ruin and vice as security and well
Hobbes wrote for the average people rather than those who ruled however his view was slightly similar to that of Machiavelli. Since Hobbes wanted men to give up their free will and power to a Leviathan. While Machiavelli worried about being a men Hobbes didn’t see that as being something important for men. Hobbes was in fear about men being dsngerous. He was the one that made a theory about how rules came to power. His theory was the stae of nature, saying that people back in the days were brutal and short so that led to authority. Authority were the ones that kept people calm and without