Low Profile Sports Psychology Paper

This research project replicates a previous study conducted in the southeast region of the United States and adds to the accumulating findings in the area of student-athlete satisfaction with the care provided by their athletic trainers. The scores for men in low-profile sports were the lowest of our 4 subgroups. Women in high-profile sports showed the highest satisfaction scores. Men in high-profile sports and women in low-profile sports fell between the other 2 subgroups, with the men in low-profile sports scoring the lowest. Athletes in high-profile sports demonstrated a higher level of satisfaction than did athletes in low-profile sports. This suggests athletes perceive that athletic trainers generally offer greater attention to athletes
Barefield S, McCallister S. Social support in the athletic training room: athletes ' expectations of staff and student athletic trainers. J Athl Train. 1997;32:333–338. [PMC free article][PubMed]
8. Fisher AC, Mullins SA, Frye PA. Athletic trainers ' attitudes and judgments of injured athletes ' rehabilitation adherence. J Athl Train. 1993;28:43–47. [PMC free article][PubMed]
9. Edwards AL. Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1957.
10. Likert RA. A technique for measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;140:1–55.
11. Fitzpatrick R. Surveys in patient satisfaction, II: designing a questionnaire and conducting a survey. Br Med J. 1991;302:1129–1132. [PMC free article][PubMed]
12. National Athletic Trainers ' Association Board of Certification. Role Delineation Study. 4th ed. Morrisville, NC: Columbia Assessment Services; 1999.
13. Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB. Handbook of Survey Research. eds. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1983.
14. Gay LR. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill; 1996.
15. National Athletic Trainers ' Association. NATA Code of Ethics. Dallas, TX: National Athletic Trainers ' Association;