Preview

Loving vs. Virgina

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
783 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Loving vs. Virgina
LOVING v. VIRGINIA

Can you imagine not being able to share your life with the person you love because of the color of your skin? Well, this was the case for those who resided in Virginia decades ago. Interracial marriages were not allowed in Virginia and sixteen other states due to the adoption of the Racial Integrity Act of 1924. The sole purpose of this act was to completely prohibit a "white person" marrying other than another "white person". Marriage licenses were not issued until the issuing official is content with the applications statements as to if their races are "correct". Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, was not going to let the state of Virginia stop them from being married, so they left the state in June of 1958 to get married in the District of Columbia, where interracial marriages were permitted. This was the rise of the Loving v. Virginia case. Not too long after their marriage, the Lovings returned back to the state of Virginia to live their life together. However, the Circuit Court of Caroline County issued an indictment charging them with violating Virginia's law on interracial marriages. On January 6, 1969, the Lovings pleaded guilty and were charged to a sentence for up to one year in jail. However, the sentence could be suspended if the couple left the state of Virginia and did not return together for twenty-five years. The trial judge stated in his opinion, that:
"Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix." Having no other choice, the couple moved back to the District of Columbia in Washington D. C. to be together. They soon initiated a suit in 1963 challenging the constitutionality of the anti-miscegenation law. The two believed that the



Bibliography: www.law.umkc.edu www.personl.umich.edu www.slate.com

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Lovings were sentenced to a year in prison, but the judge set then free under the condition they leave Virginia.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Lovings pleaded guilty, and were sentenced to one year in jail. However, the trial judge agreed to suspend their sentence for 25 year if they leave Virginia and don’t come back together for 25 years. So the Lovings left the state. Later, the Lovings appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals that their…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Loving v Virginia a married couple from Washington D.C. moved to Virginia where they were then subject to Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statute. Anti-miscegenation laws prohibit the marrying of different races with another. In Virginia, this statute prohibited the marriage between whites and any other race. Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, were married in Washington D.C. They then moved to the state of Virginia where they faced criminal charges. Both of them pled guilty and were sentenced to one year imprisonment but the sentence would be waved for 25 years if they moved out of state and didn’t return.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This essay explains and shows the differences between the Virginia colony and the Massachusetts colony. People all over Europe started coming down to the “new world” (America), they came to the new world for many reasons such as land, food, religion and much more. Before I start to contrast between the 2 colonies I’m going to give a general background on them. Massachusetts was established in 1620 and Virginia was established in 1607. Virginia’s colony was Jamestown and Massachusetts was Salem and Boston.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This would be a beautiful love story except for this couple was an interracial one and their home state of Virginia did not condone marriages between Caucasians and African-Americans. Yes, it was 1958 but the law had been in place since 1924. It didn’t matter that the couple, Mr. Richard Loving and Miss. Mildred Jeter, were legally married in Washington, DC. They returned eager to begin their life as one but was jailed. The state of Virginia upheld their law and the Lovings were sentenced to a years imprisonment. The nice judge suspended their time but they had to agree to leave Virginia and not return for 25 years. The Lovings family returned to Washington, DC but decided to visit family in Virginia. During this visit they were again arrested. During this time Mrs. Loving sought out assistance from the Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Jim Crow Laws is a list of laws that were used in previous years in different parts of the United States of America. The law above was from the state of Georgia and it forbid marriage between races. Similar laws existed in Maycomb, Alabama in the 1930s. White and black folks were separated in courtrooms, churches, and were not allowed to marry. Those who married and had mixed children were often seen as “in betweens” (Lee, 1960).…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sollors, Werner, ed. Interracialism: Black-White Intermarriage in American History, Literature, and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.…

    • 3133 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiffs in Loving v. Virginia were Richard and Mildred Loving, who were represented by the ACLU in the Supreme Court. The Plaintiff argued the prohibition of interracial marriage was unconstitutional and anti-miscegenation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment explains, “No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law.” As declared by the Constitution and Maynard v. Hill case, marriage is a civil right for citizens of the United States and the decision of whether one decides to marry a colored person or not cannot be infringed by any state. Denying anyone their given right to marry without due process of the…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pa250 Unit 1

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Loving v. Virginia (388 US 1, 1967) was a landmark case, dealing with inter-racial marriage, which went all the way to the US Supreme Court. The plaintiffs, Mildred and Richard Loving, an inter-racial couple, who were residents of Virginia, where at the time it was illegal for people of different races to be married. They went to Washington D.C. in June of 1958 to get married, and returned back to live a married couple in Virginia. Upon their return to Caroline County, Virginia they were charged with violating the law. The couple was charged when police invaded their home in the middle of the night, hoping to witness the Loving’s involved in a sexual act which was also a crime at the time in Virginia. When Mrs. Loving showed the police the marriage certificate, the police charged the couple with violating Virginia § 20-50 which, “prohibited interracial couples from being married out of state and then returning to Virginia.” As well as, Virginia § 20-59 that made “miscegenation” a felony. Black’s Law defines miscegenation as, “A marriage between persons of different races, formally considered illegal in some jurisdictions. In 1967, the US Supreme Court held that laws banning…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In today’s society, interracial couples are seen differently than they were seen twenty years ago. In “Seek Success: Marry Someone like yourself,” an article by Sue Richardson in The Dallas Morning News published, March 14, 1993, describes her attitude towards interracial couples and how she feels “horrified” and “terrified”. In her article, Richardson’s purpose is both to persuade couples not to marry into interracial unions and to criticizing those who do. She is persuading her readers that they shouldn’t engage in interracial marriage because there are “too-many differences,” that it wouldn’t work out. She does this by using a critical tone.…

    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Loving v. Virginia case wasn’t ever just a political case. It was a social class segregation that began from early on that people made law. Jim Crow Laws and many other laws, including one denying interracial relationships, was a way of suppressing a certain group of people from living the same as everyone else. This fight was one for equality and love, and those two things have been and will forever have relevance until there is total equality for all people. They had their “happy ending” where they were able to be together without…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though slavery was abolished and the “separate but equal” clause was gone, racism was still an active issue around the 1960s. Many states prohibited marriage between black and white men and women. However, in 1967 the Supreme Court ruled that interracial marriages are constitutional in the case of Loving v. Virginia. While interracial marriages did not become common for several years following, this case began the trend that only continued to increase afterwards. Today, this type of marriage is accepted by majority of Americans; however, a large percentage of people still disagree with the practice. It has become more complicated since 1960 simply because there was a scarce amount of interracial couples during that time. Now, there is more awareness, as well as more attention surrounding the topic. While the allowance of interracial marriage is not a negative matter, it was not as complicated when it was not permitted because it was discussed…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This certain law states, “The marriage of a white person with a negro or mulatto or person who shall have one-eighth or more of negro blood, shall be unlawful and void.” (Mississippi Martin Luther King Jr. National History Society SpringBoard book 197). This law is saying, when stripped down to its most basic form, that if a person who pertains to any colored race were to marry a Caucasian, their marriage would be null and void. Essentially, even if two American citizens fell in love with each other and wanted their marriage to be blessed, they would never legally belong to one another in the face of the government, which can be devastating depending on how religiously or romantically involved the interracial couple is. By confiscating the rights of colored races, the Jim Crow laws have also forced those who are white to either give up the things they love in order to conform to civilization, or to sacrifice their privileges in order to join a band of socially unequal…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Virginia: The Case Over Interracial Marriage”). In the state of Virginia, the couple was sent to prison because they violated the miscegenation laws. One late night in their Virginia home, police broke into their house. Later, they were brought to prison.The authorities educated them about the laws of Virginia. The statement shows what happened to the Lovings. “At the October Term, 1958, of the Circuit Court of Caroline County, a grand jury issued an indictment charging the Lovings with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages” (“Loving v. Virginia LII”). Due to the fact they were charged guilty, the Lovings made the decision to take their case to court. On April 10, 1967, the angry couple explained that the law was a violation of their privacy and well-being. The following shows the Loving’s reason to get help. “These Lovings claimed that the state law violated their 14th Amendment rights to pursuit life, liberty and happiness” (“Loving v Virginia” laws.com). In this ruling,the judge was Leon. M Bazile. Immediately, he made his final decision about the conflict. He believed that people of different ethnicities were not supposed to love each other. Leon Bazile quoted, "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, Malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents ... The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays