Preview

Louis Riel Should not have been Hung: Agree or Disagree?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Louis Riel Should not have been Hung: Agree or Disagree?
Justice is fairness. Justice is equality. Justice is necessary. In today's society, justice isn't always served. Over a hundred years ago, justice wasn't always served. Louis Riel was just one of the many back in the days of John A Macdonald who was discriminated against and treated without respect. He was a Canadian politician, a devoted Métis leader, and most of all, a martyr for his people. Throughout his 41 year life, from 1844 - 1885, he brought Manitoba into Confederation with Canada. During these times, there were many conflicts with the government of Canada. Even at those times, Riel stood his ground and never consented to violence. He was a peaceful spiritual leader and was a role model for his people. Even then, the people of English-speaking Canada treated him without justice. He was falsely accused of murder and high treason, which lead to his death by the gallows. For these reasons, Louis Riel should not have been hung.

Manitoba is part of Canada today because of one man's efforts ... and for that reason, Riel should not have been hung. In the late 1860s, many problems arose from the Red River settlement. The Canadian government ignored the Métis in their requests and petitions for education and proper medication in Manitoba. In response, the Métis captured Fort Garry, creating a huge uproar in English speaking Canada. The people of Red River meant to be heard. Under the superb negotiating skills and determination of Riel, the government of Canada and the Red River Settlement came to an agreement on July 15, 1870. Even today, Louis Riel is known as the 'Father of Manitoba' for his unwavering efforts to make his people heard.

Though many have accused Riel of being a troublemaker and a murderer, he was actually a peaceful spiritual leader. He was completely devoted to his people and even died for them. From 1870 - 1884, Riel had spent much time praying and devoting his life to church. He now believed that he was a religious prophet and his views on his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1885 was a big year for many people in Canada. There were groups that loved all the changes or hated them. The people that hated them were the ones that it really didn’t effect, the ones it did effect were hated. Riel was the leader for these changes people looked up to Riel, but this this there were more people who hated him as well. Here I am trying to find out whether Riel had a fair trial or not because many find that he didn’t.…

    • 509 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Cambria

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The jury found him guilty but recommended mercy; nonetheless, Judge Hugh Richardson sentenced him to death, with the date of his execution initially set for 18 September 1885.[42] Fifty years later one of the jurors, Edwin Brooks, said that Riel was tried for treason but hanged for the execution of Thomas Scott.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeffery Dahmer can be arguably the most notorious serial killer, cannibal in history. He targeted men and boys. Dahmer‘s life of crime began with drinking and sex offending. His murders were exceptionally disgusting, often involving dismemberment, torture, cannibalism, rape, and necrophilia. He was convicted with a life sentence I prison when he should have gotten the death penalty. He wasn’t any different from any other murderer who got the death penalty.(biographychannel)…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Common wisdom has it that the execution of Charles I on 30 January 1649 was a desperate, aberrant act by a small and reluctant minority of English parliamentarians - opposed by the right-thinking bulk of the population. One seventeen year-old boy in the crowd at Whitehall recorded that the execution was met with 'such a groan as I have never heard before, and desire I may never hear again'. This lad grew up to become a nonconformist minister in the 1660s but his views echoed those of a Restoration Bishop who claimed no king 'ever left the world with more sorrow: women miscarried, men fell into melancholy'. Over half of those sitting in the House of Commons in December 1648 had to be purged by Colonel Pride and his soldiers before the trial of the king could be undertaken - and this was of course a parliament from which royalist sympathisers had long been dismissed. Barely half of the one hundred and thirty five men nominated to the High Court of Justice to try the king actually attended its proceedings; sixty-eight were there when sentence was handed down, but only fifty-nine actually signed the death warrant, some later claiming undue pressure, especially from Oliver Cromwell. One member of the Rump, Thomas Hoyle, committed suicide on the anniversary of Charles' execution in 1650, while the death the same year of another, Rowland Wilson, was attributed to melancholy and guilt.…

    • 2292 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although King Charles the first was a self-righteous and arrogant ruler, I believe that he did not deserve to be executed. Under his rule, he made bad decisions and spent excessively, but his kingdom was stable. There wasn’t poverty and he didn’t treat his subjects terribly.…

    • 431 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most compelling and frankly apparent reasons for the rejection of the St. Louis was the fact that the government did not want to deal with the Jews through any means. First of all, F.C. Blair, the Director of Immigration felt that the refugees were not qualified to enter Canada based on their current immigration policy. He suggested that, “No country could open its doors wide enough to take in hundreds of thousands of Jewish people who want to leave Europe: the line must be drawn somewhere.” In other words, he felt that no exception should be made for Jewish refugees in relation to Canada’s immigration policy . Moreover, Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King believed that Canada was not responsible for solving internal difficulties of other…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Holocaust was a time of suffering form many Jewish people. Many had contributed to making all the Jewish people suffer, but one person who should have been responsible was Franz Stangl. Franz Stangl was a cruel Nazi war criminal who had also been a commander of several extermination camps during the holocaust era. Franz Stangl not only worked for the extermination camps but had also run some camps killing over 900,000 Jewish people. He had thought that the humans were cargo and garbage. Not only did he thought that the Jewish people worthless humans, but he took so many lives away from so many people. Franz Stangl had done some vicious crimes and should have been punished greatly for his actions on account of many reasons.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a controversy discussed by many state governments in the United States, the 8th amendment in the Bill of Rights is a right that protects people from cruel and unusual punishment. This amendment originally created by our founding fathers has been the main reason for this debate; some states look at death as cruel and unusual punishment while others don’t. Though the decision to sentence someone to death is considered harsh by some judges and juries, there have been crimes and occurrences where a judge feels a death penalty is reasonable.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vincent De Paul Quotes

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He was innovative and pragmatic, honest and approachable, realistic and visionary. He was opportunistic and a risk-taker. He was values-driven. He was hard-working. He was very intelligent and yet blessed with common sense. He was a master of detail and could design complex systems, but never at the expense of his own or others' humanity. His communication style was simple, straightforward, unerringly to the point, and powerfully persuasive. He was also prayerful and contemplative. He felt equally comfortable in the presence of the queen, or in the presence of a beggar. In the end, his road to sanctity can be explained by his heartfelt desire to model his life of service on the example of Jesus Christ, the evangelizer of the poor and the source and model of all…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    talking about crime rates in the New York City going down, all I see and hear…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    DOES GANDHI MATTER

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a man of action,he practiced and wished that the moral values should always govern every action of an individual like selflessness, non-violence ,truth and ahimsa and he spread the message of unity and brotherhood.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He was a very pious Muslim. His success lay in two things-fears of Allah and his love for the Holy Prophet…

    • 5277 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romeo phillion research

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Phillion was charged with the murder and during his 1972 trial four witnesses testified they saw Phillion in Ottawa on the day of the murder. Phillion was convicted and sentenced to life in prison with a minimum of ten years before parole (http://forejustice.org/db/Phillion--Romeo.html) in this particular case it was intriguing to come to realize that four witnesses had testified that they saw Phillion when intact he had not even been in the same area. Considering that this case was reopened 31 years after, unfortunately the people who testified was never put into question or put on trial. I believe those people should have been punished because not only did they put an innocent man away for over three decades but they swore on the bible that they would tell the truth and they should be punished for lying.…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Canadian History Essay

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Today’s relationship between Quebec and the rest of Canada has been relatively steady. Over the years, Québec has certainly developed separately but in association with the rest of Canada. However, without influence from the past, their relationships would not be what it is today. The development of the French and English relationship follows a long and complicated history. Throughout history, tensions between French and English Canada have been evident. Looking back at World War I and II, one of the key issues that divided English and French Canada was conscription. Quebec was against conscription, while English-Canada supported it. However, this is not the only issue that influenced the relationship between Quebec and the rest of Canada. Throughout history, there have been many defining moments which have influenced this relationship. This essay will outline three defining moments. The first one is ‘the October crisis’, which caused a national sense of crisis when a French separatist group kidnapped 2 government officials. Then, the passing of Bill 101 which brought a controversy both inside and outside of Quebec. And thirdly, ‘The Constitution of 1982’ which changed the contract that linked Quebec to the rest of Canada. These three defining moments have greatly helped to establish the character of the relationship between Quebec and the rest of Canada.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Riel was a freedom fighter, not a rebel against his country. He was rebelling against the men in government who suppressed his people. "The entire process which saw the spread of the Canadian Governments imperialistic authority over the west, ignored the people who were there long before England decided to give it to a new country. Riel was a freedom fighter for the west and should be recognized as such. He faced and fought a central Canadian government, ignorant of the west, long before Preston Manning was born." (Richard Brown, Alberta, July 7th, 1999 http://www.metisresourcecentre.mb.ca/quotes/). If Louis hadn't stood up for the Meti people, the government would have let them starve and their culture would be lost. Likewise if any minority was treated like that now, they could only be so fortunate to have someone like Louis Riel to stand up for them.…

    • 674 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays