Dr. Jean Nienkamp
Gloria Jimenez, who’s a young wife and mother decided to continue her education at Tufts University where she wrote her essay, Against the Odds, and against the Common Good. The reason Jimenez wrote this essay is to support her thesis, “State legislators who genuinely have the interests of their constituents at heart will not pass bills that put the state into the lottery business and that cause the state to engage in an activity that is close to pickpocketing.”(120). Jimenez strongly believes it is wrong of state legislators to encourage the use of unfair lotteries and she wants them to see how deceiving they are. Jimenez begins her essay by showing us some of the catchy slogans that state lotteries use to lore people in and then she begins to explain why the lotteries are so deceiving in their fancy wording. Jimenez knows that playing the lottery is the people’s choice, but she’s committed to believing that the state legislators mislead people into playing the lottery by convincing them that the tax money on the tickets will go to a good cause. Jimenez wants to know why the tax money that goes towards good causes has to be from tricking people into spending their money rather than state legislators proposing a new tax. The main reason Jimenez believes that the lottery is unfair is because people are tricked into believing it is harmless and that they aren’t losing their hard earned money to support their addiction. Jimenez very powerfully ends her essay by challenging the politicians to do the right thing and help the common good by not passing the bill that puts the state lotteries into business.
Jimenez relies heavily on using examples to support her argument that lotteries are unfair. One of the examples that is reoccurring in the text is the states uses of untrue slogans. For instance, a slogan of Maryland’s is “Play Today. Cash Tomorrow.”(118). Another untrue slogan is used by New...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document