Lord Of The Flies Jack's Response To Change

Throughout the boys all showed how they responded to change/challenges in different ways. Specifically Jack & Ralph, they responded to challenges in very different ways. We being stuck on the island and having to choose a leader Jack displayed a very dictatorship style of leadership while Ralph displayed a style similar to a democracy. Although their main objective of escaping the island was wanted by both parties, they had a conflict of main goals which was for Jack was surviving and eventually escaping the island by the help of his father a marine. An Individual’s responses to change differ, some may remain logical while other may rely on their primal instincts. Jack response to the challenge at hand which was being stranded on an island …show more content…
The individuals responded to changes quite differently , Jack decided to respond to the challenge by using force/fear to get the leadership role, while Ralph employed rules, morals, and goals to escape the island all while remaining rational. Jack brought to the others protecting, food, and fun, trying to gain their loyalty, he was also set on completing the short term goal of getting food, while Ralph preserve the challenge of getting off island as his main goal and proceeded with ways of completing that with things such as the signal fire. Jack is also very carefree when in contrast to Ralph when he takes the twins “samneric” to go hunting instead of watching the signal fire essential for their escape. When Jack gains power with his hunter tribe towards the end he responded very differently to Ralph whom remained civil and rational but Jack on the other hand relied to instill fear into his boys to keep their loyalty. He beat Wilfred to display his dominance, suggested to use a “littleun” when they played a game where they re-enacting the time they killed a bore. So when put in the same situation Ralph remains civil and ration while Jack in-barks into his primal instincts and reacts on instinct rather than