Preview

Logos, Ethos And Pathos In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Logos, Ethos And Pathos In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
In society, we often look to those in authority for guidance or clarification in times of darkness and distress. In these situations, we look to the most righteous and trustworthy of them all to be our candles in the darkness. Julius Caesar was murdered because a collection of conspirators assumed that he may in the future abuse his power. The conspirators were Cassius, Metellus, Ligarius, Cinna, Casca, Trebonius, and Brutus, Caesar's close friend. People who are used to being public speakers, such as public leaders are able to sway their audience in any direction they want with the assistance of logos, pathos, ethos. Antony and Brutus were equally honorable and well-respected, but after comparing the two funeral speeches , there’s no debate that Antony had the most effective speech because his excellent range of logos, ethos, and pathos.

In the passage,
…show more content…
To be able to correctly utilize pathos, you should use rich metaphors, match your vocal delivery to the emotion, tell stories, use descriptive words, and use sensory words. “ If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less but that I loved Rome more.”(3.2.21-24) Brutus is directly appealing to the plebeians’ morals, more importantly their sense of patriotism. You can clearly see that Brutus wanted to address each plebeians’ love for their city. You can clearly see that each plebeian cares deeply about their city because then they wouldn’t be at Caesar’s funeral trying to figure how their emperor died. Brutus is also attempting to receive empathy from the plebeians , basically saying that he didn't kill Caesar because he was jealous or utterly dislike of Caesar but because he was concerned more about Rome’s future. His main objective with this statement was to make the plebeians feel loved so they wouldn’t be angered with him and understand his side of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus used discouragement to keep citizens of Roma from arguing against him, but Antony did show true devotion for Caesar and grief for his death. "I weep for him...who is here so rude that would not be a Roman...so vile that will not love his country?"(128: III: ii) Brutus talks about weeping over Caesar's death without any tears, then dissuaded the crowd so they would not admit that Caesar did not deserve to die. "...My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me (weeps)"(134: III: ii) Antony actually had to stop and cry because of his overwhelming anguish, influencing he crowd to feel empathy, knowing how it feels to lose someone very close. Brutus used deceit for pathos and Antony used heartache, which is obviously more…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finally the Pathos method of persuasion is used. Brutus uses the Pathos method to manipulate the Plebeians by using rhetorical devices such as the obvious questions that he asks the people in the crowd that are clearly relatable and significant to their general, Julius Caesar. Antony uses the Pathos method to persuade the people as well. When Antony manipulated the Plebeians he showed how great Caesar was by exaggerating Caesar’s positive actions and characteristics. By doing this, Antony tries to show the Plebeians how honorable and victorious Caesar was and how much they used to adore…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Oh Rhetorics

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The tone of voice Brutus used in his speech was subjective and also persuasive. Brutus wanted the citizens to know that he did the right thing by killing Caesar. Brutus specifically states that he killed Caesar for the love of Rome. Brutus also states that Caesar was ambitious, which is used as a negative connotation in the speech. In the speech, Brutus tries to gain the citizens respect while explaining himself. Brutus displayed strong emotions, which is portrayed throughout the whole poem. Brutus wanted the citizens to agree that killing Caesar was a good thing and not a mistake. Also in the speech, Brutus used a lot of rhetorical questions which also helped establish a serious tone.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The paralyzing powers of speech often engulfs the human mind and corrupts it to the will of the speaker. Omnipresent in society, rhetorical appeals, the appealing powers of speech, are made to project the speaker’s thoughts and ideas of a subject matter. From ordinary conversations to commercial advertisements to public addresses, appeals are present to influence an audience’s mindset. The appeal of Logos creates compelling evidence for the audience to develop conclusions in the speaker’s favor while the appeal of Pathos relies on morals, values, and emotions to create a response from the audience. Combined with the appeal of Ethos to establish credibility in the speaker, the appeals are potentially powerful enough to cause everlasting impacts on society and revise history itself. Throughout history, great orators such as Hitler, Martin Luther King, and other political leaders have used the power of speech to transform people’s thoughts and ideas. This practice has dated back to ancient times to Mark Antony at the funeral of his friend and mentor, Julius Caesar. In William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony establishes himself to his audience, the plebeians, with Ethos then uses Pathos to pull on the audience’s heartstrings and sway the plebeians’ beliefs with Logos in an attempt to make the audience doubt Brutus’s justification of killing Caesar because he was ambitious.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Caesars funeral two of his best men gave speeches, Antony and Brutus, they both used ethos, pathos and logos in different ways to win over the crowd. Brutus was in the senate so he was supposed to give great speeches with structure. Antony was a general so he was not as good at giving speeches but was good at pumping up his solders before battle. Which he used to his advantage when speaking to the mourning crowd.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes, Brutus’s speech is considered to be the better of the two speeches. Yes, Brutus does use a lot of pathos to move the crowd. But Brutus doesn’t use a lot of other aids like ethos and pathos. Antony uses pathos, ethos, and even some logos to appeal to the crowd.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony uses all three of the persuasive appeals to convince people to one side of an argument or another. However, the most common appeal used by Antony is logos. This can be seen when he talks at Julius Caesar’s funeral, when he convinces Brutus and Cassius not to kill him after Caesar’s death, and when he asks if anyone else would leave their estate to the Romans like Caesar did.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way Brutus uses pathos is very strong. Brutus says how much he loved Caesar but he had to murder him for the better of Rome. Brutus said, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” Also, Brutus shows his sympathy over Caesar’s death. Brutus said, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant; I honor him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” Brutus…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore there is more to say that brutus embodied good. Why because the decision he had to make was a tough one. He dearly loved caesar and caesar loved him, Even after killing caesar and washing his hands with his blood. Brutus still felt responsible after his death and to the public. He feared that his friend would be crowned king which would go against the ideals of the roman republic. Brutus defends his actions’’ If there be any in this assembly, And dear friend of caesar's, to him i say that brutus love to caesar was no less than his. If then that friend demand why brutus rose against caesar, this is my answer: not that i loved caesar less, but that i loved.’’ (3.2 19-24) This shows it was hard for brutus to kill caesar.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony's Use of Rhetoric

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar," William Shakespeare shows the power of rhetoric. Rhetoric is the ability to speak or write effectively. Shakespeare shows this power through Antony, Julius Caesar's best friend. Antony shows this at Caesar's funeral, at which Brutus, one of the conspirators who killed Caesar, allowed him to speak to the public under the condition that he not speak badly of the conspirators. Antony was a powerful speaker and was deeply gifted in the art of rhetoric. He was able to turn the public against the conspirators without breaking his promise to Brutus. Antony did this by using the techniques of ethos, pathos, and logos.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus’s also said, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” which appeals to logos because his is making a logical statement that says Caesar’s death was for the best to Rome’s men freedom. At the end Brutus appeals pathos by saying, “who is there so vile that will not love his country? If any, speak; for him have I offended” Brutus tells the Roman citizen that Caesar deserved what he got because he was too ambitious and would eventually become a much powerful ruler and would make the romans his slave.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it is in our laws to to punish death with death, perhaps this should not be the penalty in this case. Caesar was not the perfect Senator, nor the perfect leader. His sin was that he subverted our laws. He was putting the power and influence of this body in trouble. Perhaps, it can be said that he was too powerful for his own good. Caesar could have been dictator for life. Was this what the Republic needed? He constantly undermined this Senate. When Bibulus was his co-consul, Bibulis was driven to staying at home, simply issuing edicts that the omens were unfavourable. Our laws call for two consuls, not for one to simply out power the other and become a consul on his own.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays