Locke's Doctrine Of Empiricism

British philosopher John Locke in the late 17th Century created the doctrine of Empiricism. Locke argued that human nature was mutable and that knowledge was gained through accumulated experience rather than by accessing some sort of outside truth. In his work “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding” he claimed that the mind begins as a clear slate and experience shapes it. He does not support the claim that humans have ideas that are innate. Locke believed in order for humans to know anything they must have experience. John Locke’s second Treatise on Civil Government provided theoretical justification for the contractual view of the monarchy as a limited and revocable, between ruler and ruled, which had triumphed in England in 1688.
It was a system of beliefs that one should cease from making claims of truth, and avoid the hypothesis of truths that are absolute. This concept is not the same as stating that the truth is impossible, but is used to support the claim that there is no certainty in the knowledge of humans. This ideal is referred to as academic skepticism. It is not surprising that Enlightenment thinkers employ skeptical tropes (drawn from the ancient skeptical tradition) to attack traditional dogmas in science, metaphysics and religion. Skepticism denotes to an outlook of doubt, toward a specific object or in general, or even to any questioning manner or mindset. Early skeptics had argued that the logical style of dispute was unsustainable, as it relied upon proposals requiring further investigations to prove true or false. Ultimately, every proposition would have to rely on another to prove its legitimacy. These skeptics also claimed that two proposals could not rely on the other, because this would make them a circular argument. They said that logic like this would be in insufficient judge of truth, creating almost more problems than it could solve. Early skeptics did not believe was inaccessible, but rather that it did not exist entirely. Instead of rejecting the probability of truth, they claimed that it simply had not been discovered it yet, and continued their analysis. Early Christian thinkers like Boethius and St. Augustine had adapted Roman and Greek traditions to show that one could find firm knowledge through the Christian religion. Michel de Montaigne of France and Francis Bacon both had starting perspectives of the skepticism viewpoint that they had known nothing to be certain. This goes the same for rationalist Rene Descartes and Blaise Pascal. These primary discoverers were careful not to discard their beliefs in Christianity. A discoverer in particular, Montaigne was eager to question the