Locavore Movement Research Paper

The Locavore Movement ICE The locavore movement is a movement where people have decided to eat locally grown or provided products in order to improve one’s nutrition and sustainability. However, This movement would not be ideal for the modern generation, due to the other sources of nutrition which are easily accessible. Although the locavore provides many nutritional benefits due to the belief that food which has been travelled less is considered healthier it is clear that the locavore movement is a difficult practice due to the other resources which are available and its geographical challenges which creates inconveniences to the average citizen. The locavore movement proves to be a difficult concept to adapt to since there are other resources
The locavore movement has been receiving a lot of popularity due to its healthy eating and healthy lifestyle benefits, but these benefits are still causing a lot of major issues to the consumer. For example, Jennifer Maiser a blogger explains all of the benefits that the locavore movement provides, such as “...eating local is better for air quality and pollution than eating organic…” (Source A). All of these benefits which are mentioned have proven to have difficult challenges. James McWilliams an author for a business magazine explains how “a 2006 study...discovered that it made more environmental sense for a Londoner to buy lamb shipped from New Zealand than to buy lamb raised in the UK.” (Source C). This explains how it is more beneficial to purchase food or in this example lamb from New Zealand which would have more transportation, than purchasing food from London which requires less transportation. This is due to the fact that the lamb in New Zealand is “raised on pastures with a small carbon footprint” which proves to be more healthier and beneficial to the consumer even though it requires more transportation. This idea that nutritious food is only
The locavore movement fundamentally argues that it provides healthy food that is locally grown and has gone through less transportation. However, through research and studies it is evident that it is time consuming for the consumer to travel to rural areas when there are other resources that provide the same health benefits. It is also impractical for a consumer to purchase locally grown food since there are other places that provide the same health benefits. The locavore movement also argues how food that has transported less is more healthy, but through research it is clear that this is not the case, because food that has been transported still provides the same necessary nutrition. Overall, it is evident that the locavore movement is difficult to adapt to due to the geographical and environmental challenges it provides and the inconvenience that the consumer has to go