Preview

Living Together Unmarried

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4422 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Living Together Unmarried
INTRODUCTION Love, flowers, food, music, stress, and happiness all combined into one day – a wedding day. While many people may fantasize about that perfect wedding day with the perfect dress or tux and a decadent cake, most aren’t ready to commit to what comes after. Some call it living in sin, others call it living in bliss, but these days it 's almost expected that a couple will live together without marriage. Cohabitation, once rare, is now the norm. Filipino family life has changed drastically as marriage is losing ground and more couples live together without tying the knot. Instead of using terms such as ‘husband and wife’ or even ‘spouse,’ businesses and advertisers speak of ‘partners’ and ‘companions’. Instead of getting married, couples talk about being together. Couples who live together without marriage are called ‘domestic partners’ - which may be people of the same or opposite sexes. A major social change has occurred during our lifetime like the acceptance of other changes in sexual and family values such as divorce, homosexuality, abortion, coed college dorms, coed gym classes, etc. But the reality is that living together without marriage can be great if both parties are truly aware of what they really want and actually stick to it, and that is a BIG IF. When it comes to this topic, there are so many opinions, facts, research, and statistics that either in favor of living together before marriage or choosing to wait until the knot is tied.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (DEVELOPMENT) Today, cohabitation is a common pattern among people in the Western world. “More than two-thirds of married couples say that they lived together before getting married. In 1994, there were 3.7 million cohabiting couples” (Wikipedia, n.d.). This is a far cry from a few decades ago. “Before 1970, cohabitation was illegal. Living together outside of marriage was uncommon, but by the late 1990s at least 50% to 60% of couples lived together premaritally. According to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the past, traditionally families have mostly been the ‘traditional nuclear family’ made up of a married man and woman and at least one child. However there has recently been a decline in the amount of traditional nuclear families and an increase in the amount of diverse families. There are now less people following the traditional view that the nuclear family is the ‘normal’ way to live. The diverse families now include families such as, lone parent families, reconstituted family, extended family, lone person households, cohabiting couples and same sex couples. In this essay I will discuss the view that the traditional nuclear family has decline as a result of the growth of family diversity and the reasons why people are no longer following past tradition. Cohabitatiion is an arrangement where two people who is not married live together in an intimate relationship, particularly an emotionally and/or sexually intimate one, on a long-term or permanent basis. Before 1970, cohabitation was illegal in certain countries e.g. America. Due to a change in the law, Cohabitation is now a common pattern among people around the world, as well as sex/birth outside of marriage, leaving at least 50% to 60% of coupless cohabitating, starting from the late 1990âs. This leads to the amount of traditional nuclear families decreasing as people want to live in companionship as nearly half the amount of marriages end in divorce, also cohabiting is an easier way as its much cheaper and doesnt cause much hassle. The New Right see the decline of the traditional nuclear family and the growth of family diversity as negative trends in modern society.…

    • 757 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over the course of the last half-century, living together before marriage has gone from rare and heavily stigmatized to normal and commonplace. At the same time, divorce rates have more than doubled, going from 20-25% of all marriages ending in divorce in the 1950’s and ‘60’s, to almost 50% today. Many couples, particularly young couples, believe that by cohabiting before marriage, they will be better able to choose a compatible marriage partner, and go into the marriage with a more accurate view of how they and their partner will solve conflict, divide responsibility, and how compatible they are both emotionally and sexually. However, most studies have found that couples that cohabit before marriage are more likely to get a divorce within the first ten years of marriage. Researchers are divided as to whether cohabitation itself is to blame for the increase in divorce rates, or whether other factors, such as socio-economic status, childhood family life, or level of education that are statistical factors for divorce are the same factors that lead to a predilection for premarital cohabitation. Using studies from the last ten years, this paper will argue that as cohabitation becomes societally normalized the likelihood of divorce will correlatively decrease, and that cohabitation on its own does not contribute to an unsuccessful or unstable future marriage. For the purposes of this paper, there will be two limitations on the studies and data collections used. The paper will focus only on studies on heterosexual couples, as legal same-sex marriage is too new for any meaningful data sets to have been accumulated. Additionally, the study will only look at couples that cohabit with the eventual goal of getting married, as opposed to couples that consider legal marriage to be unnecessary or undesirable in their union.…

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wedding are blessed events. It is the first day of the rest of your lives together. So you want your wedding day to be the most wonderful event…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Identify and explain two reasons for the increase in cohabitation in the contemporary UK (17)…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason is changing social attitudes. Religion regarded cohabitation as ‘living in sin’, but today there is less shame attached to it. Barlow et al found increasing acceptance of cohabitation. This shows that the change in religions social attitude, cohabitation is accepted more, leading to an increase in cohabitation. Some people prefer love that focuses of on intimacy, closeness and emotion rather than the duties of marriage. Giddens argues that there has been a trend towards confluent love. This love focuses on the intimacy, closeness and emotion of a relationship, rather than the feelings of obligation and duty that is in vows at marriage. When a marriage no longer has confluent love, the relationship is likely to end. This shows that monogamy may start being replaced by serial monogamy, in which cohabitation is most suited to. However, the ONS found that 60% of cohabiting couples will eventually end in marriage showing that monogamy can often replace serial monogamy. There is less pressure to follow traditional norms and values. Beck and Beck-Gernshiem argue that individualism has led to changing attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage. There is less pressure to follow the norms and values around love and relationships set by family, religion or culture. This shows that the change in attitudes has led to people making their own decision about whether they marry or cohabitate. The acceptance of sex outside marriage has made it more likely that cohabitation will occur. Allan and Crow argue that effective contraception has made it possible for partners to cohabit without fear of pregnancy. This alongside the acceptance of sex before marriage means cohabitation without marriage is likely to occur. This shows that the change in social attitudes towards sex outside of marriage has led to an increase in cohabitation.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most dramatic trends of recent years has been the tremendous increase in male-female couples who choose to live together without marrying, a practice called cohabitation. According to the 2000 Census, there are eleven million unmarried people living with an unmarried partner in the United States today, and this number has grown 72% in the last decade alone. While many people like David Popenoe, a Professor of Sociology, on his essay Sociological Reasons Not to Live Together suggests that living together is not a good way to prepare for marriage or to avoid divorce. There is another point of view like an organization called The Alternatives to Marriage Project (AtMP) believes that unmarried relationships should deserve validation and support.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cohabitation is the living together and having a sexual relationship often without the individuals being married. Over the last 40 years there have been many changes to patterns of marriage and cohabitation and new patterns have formed. One main pattern that has began to be seen, is marriage is on a decline. This is due to a number of reasons.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking at my own marriage, my parents, grandparents, and my brother’s relationships, I have develop a small understanding of what the major differences are between being married in a single home or living with a mate unmarried. It was not long ago that the practice of living together without being married started. As well as getting married for “love.” Which is another topic altogether. Today couples very in what they want. Some prefer the freedom of a single life but want a stable partner, while others seek out traditional marriage to start a family.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Grover, Sam. "Similarities Between Cohabitation & Marriage | EHow." EHow. Demand Media, 15 June 2011. Web. 14 July 2013.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smock, P. J. (2000). "Cohabitation in the United States". Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 43-52. Retrieved July 24, 2010 from Academic Search Complete database.…

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fear of divorce is also something heavily influencing trends in both marriage and cohabitation. Young people, having perhaps experienced parental divorce are feared of entering into a commitment that they are simply not sure about, this sometimes seems like a reasonable thing to do considering the high divorce rate, a third of marriages currently ending in divorce. This would of course increase cohabitation as more and more people wish to enter into what Chester deems a ‘trial marriage’, to ensure marital…

    • 680 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As society’s view of a ‘conventional family’ has changed over the last 40 years, the variety of acceptable norms has increased drastically. In the past, an unmarried woman or spinster would be looked down on in society ,as it was a norm that a woman should be married with children. If they didn’t they would be judged as there was a problem with them so that they couldn’t have kids or a husband. The average age for a women first getting married in 1961 was 23.1 this has risen to 30 by June 2009. This shows that women are now waiting longer for their first marriage. This is down to many different reasons. Single women aren’t looked down on by the majority of people today, they are viewed as strong, independent women. This means that there is next to no pressure for women to get married quickly. This has resulted in the rise in cohabitation. Marriage is no longer seen as the definition of a proper relationship by society. 40 years ago, living together outside of marriage was a rarity; however cohabitation can now be seen as a socially acceptable alternative to marriage. This is partly due to the changing attitudes to sexual relationships mean that sex…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 20th century has been the scene of rapid social change. Educational, political, economic and religious institutions have been changing and morphing as the century progressed. These institutional changes have impacted individuals and families in dramatic ways. Gender roles have changed, family mobility has increased, fertility has declined and union formation patterns have become more fluid and less stable (Morrison, 2015). Over the past 40 years cohabitation has moved from being viewed as a deviant form of union formation to the preferred social norm as a transition from dating to marriage. Cohabitation is when a couple lives together for an extended period as if they were married, but is not a legal agreement. Many couples that are planning…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cohabitation is on the rise plain and simple, in the textbook on page 331 figure (9.1) shows that. In 1960 it shows that about .6 million couples were living together that were not married, this is what cohabiting means. Then fast forward 60 years and that number has jumped a crazy amount. Now that number that was .6 million, has risen to a little over 7.4 million couples living together. This graph is going straight up and I don’t see it stopping anytime soon. I am going to be talking about all the reason people are resorting to cohabitation. It is a smart move…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Living Apart Together

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Living Apart Together, also called L.A.T, is a unique phenomenon that through modern time has become more and more popular among couples. The purpose of L.A.T is that a couple, which either are married, engaged or boyfriend and girlfriend, who has an intimate relationship but the couple lives separately on separate addresses. LAT relationships is increasingly understood and also accepted in public. It is seen by most people, as good enough partnership and the couples still remain the same expectations about the commitment and loyalty as marriage or cohabitation. Text 2, ‘’Home Alone Together’’ written by Jill Brooke, focuses on pro and cons statements from both experts and from quite ordinary people. Jeannette Lofas, who is a clinical social worker and the founder of the Stepfamily Foundation, is pro living apart together. She thinks it could be a great solution to blended families because ‘’blended families are so vulnerable to internecine resentments and power struggles’’. Some couples, especially young couples, which are in a L.A.T relationship is because of commitment problems. That is why Gail Sheehy, who is an author and writer of the book ‘’Sex and the seasoned Woman’’, also agrees Another advocator (FIN SAMKÆD) of L.A.T relationships is Judye Hess who is a family therapist in Berkeley, California. According to Judye Hess are there to many couples that are trying way to hard to fit into a model of the perfect relationship, and that does not always work out and the solution of that problem could be a L.A.T relationship. In text 3, ‘’Just What Modern Romance Needs: ‘’Living Apart Together’’ ’’ written by Gary Picariello, Living Apart Together is explained as a new term for couples who just don’t want to commit. Gary Picariello is con Living Apart Together, because he don’t think that it is a good solution to a couple who are not good at compromising, negotiation and commitments, as he explains ‘’having their own space to retreat to during the rough times in…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics