Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Literary Essay - Julius Caesar

Satisfactory Essays
557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Literary Essay - Julius Caesar
Literary Essay - Julius Caesar As humans, none of us are entirely good or entirely evil. It is the same with the characters in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. While many are portrayed as good or evil, none really are. This can be more easily explained through the characters Brutus, Marc Antony and Julius Caesar.

From the very first mention of Brutus the audience is told that he is the most honorable man in Rome. This would persuade us to believe that he is a good character. From the beginning this is true, but not too far into the play, after some coaxing by Cassius, Brutus' more evil side is revealed. He contributes to the plot of killing Caesar and says in Act II scene 1 line 10 "It must be by his death…" This alone is totally the opposite of what an honorable man would do. Nevertheless, he tries to redeem himself by adding in Act II scene 1 line 11-12 "I know no personal cause to spurn at him, but for the general." So we are led to believe that "sacrificing" Caesar is and honorable thing being done for the Roman people not just a well organized murder. This is one example of how no one is entirely good.

Next is Caesar's right hand man, Marc Antony. He loved Caesar very much and was deeply saddened when Caesar was murdered. After this event, he persuades Brutus to let him speak at Caesar's funeral as a friend. Act III scene 1 line 227-230 "And am moreover suitor that I may produce his body to the market place; and in the pulpit, as becomes a friend, speak in the order of his funeral" The real reason why Antony wanted to speak at the funeral was to let the people know that Brutus murdered Caesar for no good reason. He expresses his success in Act III scene 2 line 270-271 "Belike they has some notice of the people, how I had moved them." Marc Antony never forgives Brutus and the other conspirators for murdering Caesar and even goes to war with them because of it. Antony fighting for his friend's death shows that he is good. But he tricks the others which show's some bad in him.

The last case is a little different than the others. This last example exactly isn't of complete good or evil. It just shows how no one is perfect. Caesar was to be the ruler of the Roman Empire. Everyone thought that he was the best person for the job. He was thought of as a god. Gods are perfect and Caesar was far from it. In Act I scene 2 lines 111 Cassius tells Brutus stories of how weak Caesar is. "Caesar cried 'help me, Cassius, or I sink.'" He continues by adding in lines 127-128 "Alas it cried, 'give me some drink, Titinius,' as a sick girl." This shows how Caesar was not like any god even though that is what the people believed.

The whole point of this essay was to show how even in plays that it is impossible to have someone who is entirely good or evil. It's just too unrealistic. As humans, we all possess good and bad characteristics. They may not be balanced but there isn't anyone who is totally good or evil.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.Why do Octavius and Mark Antony want to engage in a battle with Brutus and Cassius?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical devices enhance a speaker’s argument by making the reader or listener question and think about the topic more thoroughly. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony’s funeral speech for Caesar persuaded the audience more effectively than Brutus’ speech because of his use of rhetorical devices such as logos, aposiopesis, anaphora.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    devices in order to persuade Brutus, a senator and friend of Caesar, that Caesar is…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A highly-regarded politician and conspirator in ancient Rome, Brutus, in his funerary speech to Julius Caesar, effectively claims that the conspiracy killing of Caesar is justified. First, he supports this claim by asserting that if Caesar was still alive, he would eventually force the people of Rome to act like his slaves, like a true dictator. Brutus uses a rhetorical question to appeal to logos when stating, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men? (Shakespeare). This rhetorical question makes the audience think about how their lives would be if Caesar would continue to powerfully reign. Brutus compares them to the slaves of Caesar that work under his authority until death,…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Cicero states: “men may construe things after their fashion”, in the midst of subjective conflicting perspectives upon a certain personality, what would you draw from it? William Shakespeare lends this thought to the audiences of his time as well as ours through the play, Julius Caesar. Was Julius Caesar really the noblest man that ever lived, an ambitious tyrant, or both? Enhanced by the personal values of Cassius and Brutus, we can discover that studying the conflicting perspectives of Caesar and his power can bring us closer to the truth of his character whilst cultivating a more diverse and provocative insight to Shakespeare’s context and audience.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the opening of the play, common Romans, such as the Cobbler, celebrate Caesar’s return to Rome. They are for Caesar and, thus, celebrating his victorious win over Pompey. As stated by Cobbler in Act 1, Scene 1, Line 32, he said, “But indeed, sir, we make holiday to see Caesar and to rejoice in his triumph.” The commoners are treating Caesar’s return as a holiday. Because they are in high spirits to see Caesar, they are taking a day off work. After the ten years Caesar has left, the people of Rome still love and praise Caesar for being a benevolent leader. He is for the people, unlike Pompey who continues to be a conservative. While Pompey does not give the people power, Caesar does. However, noble Romans, such as Flavius and Cassius,…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore there is more to say that brutus embodied good. Why because the decision he had to make was a tough one. He dearly loved caesar and caesar loved him, Even after killing caesar and washing his hands with his blood. Brutus still felt responsible after his death and to the public. He feared that his friend would be crowned king which would go against the ideals of the roman republic. Brutus defends his actions’’ If there be any in this assembly, And dear friend of caesar's, to him i say that brutus love to caesar was no less than his. If then that friend demand why brutus rose against caesar, this is my answer: not that i loved caesar less, but that i loved.’’ (3.2 19-24) This shows it was hard for brutus to kill caesar.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “For let the gods so speed me as I love the name of honor more than I fear death. (I.ii.180)” Marcus Brutus, the tragic hero of Julius Caesar, is a widely admired, honorable leader and senator of Rome. Many follow Brutus due to his honest nature, though this nature leads to his death.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus was an honorable man, as many have said. High in power, he always spoke the truth to the people of Rome, saying he would kill himself for the good of it. He was Caesar's right-hand man and did what he thought was right. In this play he was tricked by He was tricked by Cassius and believed the only way to stop his rule was to kill him. In the play, Brutus was an honorable man, but trusted almost everyone. Still, Brutus killed himself believing his choice was right one. In Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Brutus was seen as the tragic hero of the play.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the mamba

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus is an honorable man in this play but when Cassius, one of the main characters, and villain from the play, points out to Brutus why he doesn’t like Caesar, Brutus starts analyzing it. Then his first internal argument in the play starts to form. "Men at some times are masters of their fates. / The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars / But in ourselves, that we are underlying. / Brutus and Caesar- what should be in that "Caesar"? / Why should that name be sounded more than yours?” Brutus starts to over think things and complicates himself even more than it already was.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Thesis

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brutus is tricked into the conspiracy by Cassius. Brutus never had any true motives behind killing Caesar. He just did it for fear he "would" become ambitious. After his death Antony even states, "This was the noblest Roman of them all. All the conspirators, save only he, /Did that they did in envy of great Caesar..." (5.5.68-70). On the other hand, Brutus hid his true feelings behind a mask. In his heart, Brutus knew that everyone was not out for the same purpose as him. In reality, Brutus didn't want to hurt Caesar, but he felt it was only necessary. He even says, " Let not our looks put on our purposes, But bear it as our Roman actors do" (2.1.224-225). Even in his speech at Caesar's funeral, Brutus continued to appear as if he thought the murder was more of a sacrifice for Rome. When asked whether or not the conspiracy should take an oath of loyalty Brutus says there is no need and remarks with, " O, then by day where wilt thou find a cavern dark enough/ To mask thy monstrous visage? Seek none conspiracy;/ Hide it in smiles and affability" (2.1.79-81). He appears to everyone has confident on his decision, but in reality, he longs for a place to hide his true…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brutus: Archetypal Hero

    • 1879 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Shakespeare characterizes Brutus in such a way that it initially hides his real purpose and involvement in the story, though reveals his character traits to be very similar to those of the archetypal hero. Early in the play, Brutus is shown as a constant and stable character, and obviously wouldn’t take on a radical change like that of a tragic hero. However, as the story progresses, Shakespeare creates such a deep and conflicted character to the point that Brutus can garner both pity and respect from the audience. The archetypal hero is usually born into a society that is usually in a state of conflict, one that will cheer “in the triumph over Pompey’s blood”(I.i.52), as the people celebrate Caesar’s defeat of a former ally. Rome was a breeding ground for trouble within its political body, its people, and the military protecting it. Corruption played a huge role in Roman society and would cause distrust and alliances within the Roman populous such of those of Roman senators who called others “blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things”(I.i.36), because they are disgusted with the worship of Caesar. Even before the conspiracy involving the death of Caesar, Roman officials within the Senate body had plans of assassinations and overthrows, all in the rush for power and money. As a result of these rivalries within Rome, Civil War broke out Caesar himself and…

    • 1879 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays