Line manager involvement in learning and development

The Emerald Research Register for this journal is available at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregister The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0142-5455.htm Line manager involvement in learning and development
Small beer or big deal?

Small beer or big deal?

281

Stephen Gibb
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

Received August 2002
Accepted January 2003

Keywords Learning, Development, Line management, Knowledge management
Abstract Increasing line manager involvement in learning and development (L&D) at work is one important part of the broader changing relations between line managers and human resource management (HRM). The advantages of increasing line manager involvement in L&D at work are frequently highlighted. However, the disadvantages raise questions about the overall impact on
L&D at work. Evidence about the practice of L&D at work depending on line manager involvement is limited. Instead of having an evidence base to evaluate it there is only scope to reflect more critically on the significance of the trend to line manager involvement in L&D at work in context.
Two principal interpretations are possible; one that the trend is of minimal significance, the other that it is of much greater significance. Increasing line manager involvement in L&D at work is both part of the means of attaining, and one of the ends of, broader changes in work, organisation and
HRM. The conclusion here is that there are legitimate concerns about shifting to increasing line manager involvement in L&D at work, where that prejudices the provision and use of specialist
L&D at work resources. However, these concerns are outweighed by the greater concern to re-align work, organisation and management for an era where knowledge management is predominant.
The issue of line manager involvement in L&D at work will continue to be an important part of the corporate and critical review

References: Allen, R. (1994), “The need for diversity in corporate training; one size doesn’t really fit”, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol Beattie, R. (2002), “Going native: ethnographic research in HRD”, in McGoldrick, J., Stewart, J. Beaumont, G. (1996), Review of 100 NVQs and SVQs: A Report Submitted to the Department for Education & Employment, DfEE, London. CIPD (2000), Success through Learning: The Argument for Strengthening Workplace Learning, CIPD Consultative Document CIPD, London. Davenport, T. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. (The) Economist (1996), “Fatal attraction”, The Economist No. 23 March, pp. 95-6. Gibb, S. (1999), “The usefulness of theory; a case study of formal mentoring schemes”, Human Relations, Vol Harrison, R. (2002), Learning and Development, CIPD, London. Hay, M. (2002), “Strategies for survival in the war for talent”, Career Development International, Vol IRS (1996), “The changing world of personnel”, IRS Employment Trends, No. 604, pp. 4-11. Johnson, S., Campbell, M., Devins, D., Gold, G. and Hamblett, J. (2000), Learning Pays; The Bottom Line, National Advisory Council for Education and Training Targets (NACETT), Katzenbach, J. and Smith, D. (1993), The Wisdom of Teams, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Keeys, G. (1994), “Effective leaders need to be good coaches”, Personnel Management, November, pp Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning; Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Leibowitz, Z., Shore, J. and Schuman, G. (1992), “Managers can be developers too”, Training and Development, March, pp Leicester, C. (1989), “The key role of the line manager in employee development”, Personnel Management, March, pp Lynton, R. and Pareek, U. (2000), Training for Organisational Transformation; Part 1 for Policy Makers and Change Managers, Sage, London. Manning, S. (2002), Resource Base of a Research Project Cluster Related to Human Resource Development in Europe, Document, Document 12, WIFO Research Forum, Berlin. Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarborough, H. and Swan, J. (2002), Managing Knowledge Work, Palgrave, Basingstoke. Redman, T. and Snape, E. (1992), “Upward and onward: can staff appraise their managers?”, Personnel Review, Vol Seely-Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (2000), “Balancing act; how to catch knowledge without killing it”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp Senge, P. (1992), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organisation, Century, London. Stumpf, S. (1998), “Corporate universities of the future”, Career Development International, Vol. 3 No Tulgan, B. (2001), Winning The Talent Wars, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. and Snyder, W. (2002), Cultivating Communities of Practice, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Whitear, G. (1993), The NVQ Handbook, Pitman, London.