Preview

Lincoln and His Generals Book Report

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1235 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lincoln and His Generals Book Report
Lincoln and His Generals Book Review

Lincoln and His Generals is a book by Thomas Williams that focuses on the Civil War as being the first modern war and the way President Lincoln lead his divided nation during this dark historic time. Williams introduces the Union army as one that has no shape to it. This includes the lack of any plan of attack, as the thought of war had not been converted into any type of scheme. The armies lacked organization and communication, and existing generals were old and incompetent. The first task that Lincoln had was the immediate selection of Generals. Lincoln's selection process was sometimes based on political and personal grounds, and he was in the position of selecting from a pool of generals that had no experience leading a large army. Williams tells us that even if the selection was for political reasons, Lincoln had the best interest of the nation in mind. It appears that control was an important factor in Lincoln's selections, however, Williams continually argues that if Lincoln had had generals who were more competent he would not have interfered as much. In Lincoln, one sees a willing amateur, one who had the ability to bring out the best in some men, and also learn from them.
Williams gives us insight into Lincoln's thought process. Williams supports this with various examples and numerous interactions that Lincoln had with his Generals. One example of this is Lincoln's selection of General Scott, the first General of the Union forces. When Lincoln interacted with Scott, he showed an admiration for Scott's age and knowledge. This allowed Scott to show his skills, this humility was shared by General McClellan. Lincoln later changes his approach towards McClellan, trying to boost his confidence and courage. Williams continually shows McClellan as an egotist, who eventually replaced Scott as General in chief. McClellan is depicted as unsure, indecisive, self-centered and fearful of declaring war. Lincoln



Cited: Dawson, Joseph G. III. "T. Harry Williams." Dictionary of American Biography. Vol. 17, 431-446 Williams, T. Harry. Lincoln and His Generals. New York: Dorset Press, 1952.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Grant’s leadership tactics and battle strategies were not only adequate, but they were remarkable. At first, Lincoln disagreed with Grant’s plan to siege Vicksburg. Even though Lincoln did not agree with Grant’s plan, Grant continued because he thought he knew best and did what he thought would win the North Vicksburg. Grant’s plan was to surround Vicksburg and cut of all supplies. While doing this, they would continuously move in closer and closer and keep firing on the city. “...Vicksburg is so strong by nature and so well fortified that sufficient force cannot be brought to bear against it to carry it by storm against the present Garrison. It must be taken by a regular siege or by starving out the Garrison.” (Grant, 1). This six week siege proved to be effective when Vicksburg surrendered and Grant and the Union won the…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln is willing to accept the risk of Hooker trying to set himself up as dictator because Lincoln recognized Hooker's skill as a general. Up to this point, Lincoln had dealt with so many other contentious or outright incompetent military commanders that Hooker's ambition was an acceptable flaw. From McClellan's tendency to freeze and avoid the offensive, as well as his belief in a "limited war" to Burnsides' massive failure at Antietam to Bragg's indecisiveness, Lincoln was in desperate need of a reliable general to lead the army and change the course of the war. The Confederacy had the leadership of the legendary Robert E. Lee, who I don't believe even Grant could compare to. Lincoln saw that Hooker had all the qualities of an exceptional…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lincoln entered the Presidency rooted in the beliefs that the executive branch’s power came second to the legislative, as stated in the Constitution. His “immediate predecessors—Democrats Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan—had set the pattern for a weak executive, conceiving their roles as little more than clerks...who either approved or disapproved legislation developed from Congress’s agenda,” (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175). However, following the secession of seven southern states immediately after Lincoln’s election, his focus became reuniting the union: “he sought to reassure his fellow countrymen and to prevent more states from seceding,” (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175). To accomplish this, Lincoln was headfast in his decisions, often reaching beyond traditional executive power and, in effect, overriding the other branches of government. These decisions were extremely controversial: Groiler Encyclopedia says, “As a commander in chief Lincoln was soon noted for vigorous…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essay entitled "The Military Leadership of the North and South" by Harry Willams points out the military leadership weaknesses displayed by Union and Confederate forces. Williams opens his essay by stressing and explaining the importance of leaders during a time of war. He states that "...it is the general who is the decisive factor in battle." (p.39). This is an accepted belief among many great leaders of the past. A successful leader must be able to demonstrate confidence and morale even in times of weakness, as well as capable of being wary and level-headed in times of strength. Marshal Saxe entertains the interesting fact that the North 's commanders were considerably younger than those of the South. However, age cannot be unquestionably attributed to Union victory. Generals of both sides, despite age or experience, displayed similar faults. The Confederate leaders were unexperienced in commanding and administering large armies. Nevertheless, the West Pointers had received military education that had emphasized administration and technique. As for strategy, many adopted the beliefs of Antoine Henri Jomini. His theories and beliefs formed a basis for military…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After completing the story “Our Father Abe” by Harvey L. Barash, M.D. and Eva Barash Dicker, M.S. I discovered that one man, Abe Barash a Deaf shoe repairmen, can make an astonishing difference in the world. During Abe’s selfless life he advised a countless amount of people. He helped any and every one that come to him. A man that had emotional difficulties, a long-time friend of Abe whom developed Parkinson’s disease, Mrs. Hook a blind and Deaf woman, along with a Deaf amputee in his community. These are only a small representation of the people that Abe was able to impact in his life. It’s marvelous how one Deaf shoe repairmen can make a huge impact on so many lives.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1776 Book Report

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The story begins with descriptions of George Washington, Nathaniel Greene and Henry Knox. The author describes the men’s prior experiences and backgrounds, and how they became generals in the war. Based off the descriptions in the story, the men are described as normal, everyday men who devoted their lives to a cause they believed in. The general’s lack of prior experience leads to an unprepared Continental Army.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. One writer maintains that slaves in the South are the “happiest” and “freest” people in the world and workers in the North are not. How this is so?…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The bloodiest war in American history, led by Abraham Lincoln for the north, and Jefferson Davis for the south, both presidents, but two different sides. Both garner for peace, yet one is willing to start a war, while the other is willing to accept it. This essay will compare and contrast the political, economical, and social outlooks on Lincoln’s and Davis’ Inaugural addresses throughout the civil war between the North and South. Slavery, laws, and state rights drove the South to start a war, and Lincoln received the war with open arms. Both sides wanted peace, but their means of achieving it and their leaders’ choices and beliefs differed greatly while still holding similarities.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Confederates (also referred to as the “South” or the “Grays”) are led by a gentleman who values and morals are waivered by no outside influence; his name is General Robert E. Lee, also known as “the Old Gray Fox”. He is a very religious man who takes time to observe what is happening and waits to make a decision and sequentially allows his actions to unfold with the support of his trusted underlings and his God. “’…General Lee makes decisions and he moves,’” (Shaara 251). **As well as all of these, Lee was passionate and determined about winning the war. ** He truly cared for all that worked with him before and during the war as seen in chapter two, part three, after learning of Reynolds’s death, Reynolds“…his mind flashed a vision of Reynolds. A neat trim man. A gentleman, a friend. Lee shook his head…Reynolds dead. Gone.” (Shaara 104).…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The book begins by showing Lincoln in the final days of the Civil war waiting anxiously to hear results of the battles that took place. This was perhaps my favorite part of the book. Military history has always fascinated me. This book details the amazing battle of two of the greatest generals in United States history. Ulysses S. Grant vs. Robert E. Lee. It shows that they both were very bold men and wanted to win. In my opinion this book shows that no man other than Lincoln did more to win the war than Grant. This gave Grant the edge of being the better general between the two.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) What do you think: “city upon a hill,” or “place of shadows” (Winthrop & Meacham, p. 39)? Do you think of the U.S. as a kind of Promised Land (p. 47)? Chapter 1…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He read military history. He learned about strategy and tactics. He read military history. He understood what was needed actions were needed as events came about. He didn’t want to destroy the south, but was prepared to, primarily to save the union and abolish slavery.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The President is seen as one of the most influential people in the United States, therefore it is important that he or she is a strong leader. Previous presidents worked to shape the nation into what it is today. While most contributed positively, some could be praised more than others. Abraham Lincoln was a much stronger president than George Washington and Thomas Jefferson because he helped America survive, had a unique leadership style, and abolished slavery.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincolns avoidance of any outward expression of truculence, his early softening of State Department's attitude toward Britain, his deference toward Seward and Sumner, his withholding of his own paper prepared for the occasion, his readiness to arbitrate, his golden silence in addressing Congress, his shrewdness in recognizing that war must be averted, and his clear perception that a point could be clinched for America's true position at the same time that full satisfaction was given to a friendly country. In terms of war strategy, Lincoln articulated two priorities: to ensure that Washington was well-defended, and to conduct an aggressive war effort that would satisfy the demand in the North for prompt, decisive victory; major Northern newspaper…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reconstruction

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Friday April 12, 1861, America embarked into war with its biggest adversary; America! The American Civil War broke out, and what was believed to be a quick battle by the North, turned out to be a long bloody four years and left the country devastated. President Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, successfully lead this country through its greatest constitutional, military and moral crisis. Everything he did was in the best interest in preserving this nation to what it is today. If President Lincoln task of preserving the union would have failed, our nation would be a split nation today. All the events of the Civil War are what truly shaped the face of America today. The President knew that if he wanted to preserve this nation as a whole, not only would he have to win the war, but he would have to have a plan in place to immediately fix the nation to help it move forward from war. During his time in the white house and towards the end of the war, when it was evident the North would prevail, he worked on a reconstruction plan to get the South up and moving. During the war, the northern armies had gone through the South destroying everything that would help the south to prevail in the war. The agricultural belt that was the strength of the was nothing more than ashes as the North marched his armies from Atlanta to the Sea, famously known as Sherman’s March, in which they destroyed everything from crops to railroads. After four long years of war, on April 10, 1865 General Lee surrendered, and the Civil War came to an end. Lincoln was preparing to move the nation forward in Reconstruction. The President, however, never saw his plans for Reconstruction in America because on April 14, 1865, he was assassinated, leaving Andrew Johnson to take over as President,…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays