Preview

Liberttarian Free Will And Its Relation To Moral Responsibility

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
232 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberttarian Free Will And Its Relation To Moral Responsibility
The concept of libertarian free will and its relationship with moral responsibility is a topic of concern to many theists and an issue that has been argued over many times. According to Reason and Responsibility by Joel Feinberg, libertarianism is the theory that free will is not determined or “the result of random chance,” Instead, it is the outcome of rational agency (anything that can make decisions). Personally, I believe in the libertarian view towards the concept of free will and its relation to moral responsibility. Libertarian free will is the freedom to make a choice without the limitation or determination of human nature or God Himself. In other words, libertarian free will is the ability to act contradictory to one’s own nature.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Free will, by definition, is having the ability or power to act without regard to limitations and at the individuals own discretion.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nahmias, E., Stephen, M., Nadelhoffer, T., & Turner, J. (2005, October). Surverying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Psychology, 18(5), 561 - 584.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments about free will are mostly semantic arguments about definitions. Most experts who deny free will are arguing against peculiar, unscientific versions of the idea, such as that free will means that causality is not involved. These arguments leave untouched the meaning of free will that most people understand which is consciously making choices about what to do in the absence of external coercion, and accepting responsibility for one’s actions. Hardly anyone denies that people engage in logical reasoning and self-control to make…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The brain is a powerful, mystical part of every living being. It controls what we think, what we do, and how we act. Every day we are faced with decisions. As a human being, we are given the intelligence and brain to make conscious decisions, whether they are good decisions or bad decisions. We have the free will to make them, but is our decision truly conscious? There are many things that influence or determine our behavior. The brain works in magical ways, sometimes with reason and sometime without. Many times we may question our behavior. Libet's experiment looked at the brain and hot it affects our decisions to act or not act, which is basically our free will. Benjamin Libet wanted to explore whether our free will was really free or tied…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHL 458 Week 1

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Free will is the power to make choices freely without any constraints or compulsions. Free will is a voluntary decision and an independent choice. It is the “capacity to respond in ways that oppose even the strongest influences” (Ruggiero, 2009). People possess free will. This is the reason why people’s decisions are unpredictable. Free will helps a person form thoughts. No matter the pressure or force placed on a person, the person will act on his or her own free will when making decisions.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant, a soft determinist, said that in order to make a moral decision we must have freedom. Kant believed that the ability to make moral decisions lay within the existence of freedom; stating that if we are not free to make our own decisions those decisions could not be moral as we were never free to make that decision in the first place. Kant thought that a person could be blamed for an action if they could have acted differently; for example if a person’s family is held at gunpoint and they are forced to open a safe they cannot be blamed as they did not have a choice. If we are to have free will we must have the ability to make a decision that is unhindered; Kant believed that we must have free will if we are to be help morally responsible for our actions, if God did not give us free will then our decisions cannot be considered immoral or moral as we would have had to act in the way we did. Thus we cannot be held responsible; a good moral action cannot be praised as you had no other option, whilst an immoral action cannot be punished as once again there was no free choice.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will discuss if freewill is compatible with determinism. The concepts surrounding free will and determinism will be examined. The concepts are: incompatibalism, compatibalism, moral responsibility and libertarianism. Each concept has sub categories falling under the titles of hard or soft depending on the views. I will argue that freewill is compatible with determinism as there are certain things that are determined by physical process’s stemming from the formation of the universe resulting in the formation of the “laws of nature.”…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the religious community preaches its own view of free will, science sees the matter very differently. The scientific community has two main ideas concerning free will. The first of these ideas is libertarianism, which states that people are free to act on their own accord without the determinism of human nature and from any predeterminism coming from a spiritual entity, including a god. The second and more popular opinion is that of hard determinism. Hard determinism insists that no person is morally responsible for their actions because everything has a cause or causes that determine what it is. Most people believe that they are making the choices they make freely. Science says that for a person to have free choice in a decision, they must have options to choose from.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fate cannot be fought. Fate is a development of events beyond a person’s control (google.com). Everyone has a fate that nobody can change regardless of any free-willing choices made. Fate was often a way of saying people’s destiny was already chosen. Fate was also used as a saying the outcome of something that had already came about.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Libertarianism and compatibilism each have very convincing arguments regarding free will, however they contradict each other in several ways. Libertarianism accepts that free will exists and that free will is defined as the ability to act differently from deterministic laws. However, libertarianism rejects that everything occurs according to deterministic laws. The deterministic law can be summarized into a basic principle: Everything is predetermined, all effects are the uncontrollable result of causes. Compatibilists contradict libertarianism by accepting that everything occurs according to deterministic laws. Compatibilists do agree that…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Libertarianism, as Sandel defines it, is the conception that we as human beings own ourselves, our bodies, and our earnings, and not anyone including the government has the right to take or limit any of our life chooses. When reading Sandel's article I started to understand his reasoning behind libertarianism and why it was something the human race should not overlook. In my point of view I see libertarianism as a foundation that stands on the idea of individuality and freedom. However, when I think of the free world and what we stand for it only poses the ultimate question, what rights do we really have being that the government has created many restrictions on what we as the people try to have control over for ourselves? One of the great…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanity

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William James an American philosopher and psychologist, defends a moderately reasonable style of libertarianism. He has faith in free will and entitlements we are free whenever we have a genuine choice. I find Mr. James analysis of determinism in Melanie Chaparian’s, “Am I free or determined?” to be substantial in the sense that libertarianism must be contemporary in the human condition but I found his theory a lot more flexible than the declarations by determinism. Libertarianism is more complex because it looks into the human thought process than a simple excuse such as, there is no free will because everything is pre-determined, which takes away any responsibility human should have for their activities. Libertarianism includes the principle of free will, therefore stating that we always have the power to choose our actions, regardless of the situations. Free will is the opposite of determined; this is the key hurdle among Libertarianism and Determinism. In James defense of free will, he argues that we can choose between possible actions and in order to prove that we chose our own action to prove that we have free will and we do what we feel that is right or wrong. People may choose any of…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The metaphysical issue on free will is, perhaps, one of the most controversial issues in the philosophical world. There are three main positions that philosophers have taken on the free will debate. The first, and possibly the most supported position, is Determinism. Determinism argues that human actions are causally determined by pervious conditions or events. This theory also concluded that, because all actions are predetermined by pervious conditions and the laws of nature, then people do not act freely and are not responsible for their actions. This theory was supported by both Scientist, Sir Isaac Newton, and mathematician, Pierre Simon, Marquis de Laplace, because it followed the laws of nature. Philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre rejected this…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Libertarianism is the idea that if at any one moment a person has multiple possibilities for their action, they have free will to choose whichever action they want. The first premise of the causal determinist argument is that every event occurs under a causal condition that ensures its occurrence, which disproves free will. If person A is to believe in both, this means they believe that Aristotle’s uncaused cause idea, which is that a person causes an action, but there are no causes that make a person cause that action. The only explanation for this theory is that there is an immaterial soul acting outside the laws of physics, which is uncaused, that is interacting with the body within the laws of physics, which is caused.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ban on sugary drinks

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Libertarianism is a philosophy of personal liberty- the liberty of each person to live according to his own choices free from the interference of other (pg 113, Moral Issues in Business).…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays