Preview

Liberal Republican Argumentative Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
853 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberal Republican Argumentative Analysis
After Reconstruction the states that resided in the north were primarily Liberal Republican. This was due from Lincoln’s association with the Republican Party, and the role he had on equal treatment for blacks during the Civil War (Boles pg. 570). Also, the term liberal is associated with the progressive party, which means looking forward. In contrast, the south was primarily Conservative Democratic, with the term conservative associated with being stuck in old ways of doing things. This implies that they did not agree upon the equal opportunities among blacks and whites, because they viewed blacks more as servants. This way of thinking stemmed from before the Civil War, when slavery was still in common practice. So, one of the main divisions between the two parties was the issue on race. Today the south is largely associated with the Conservative Republican platforms, and the north being associated with the Liberal Democratic platforms. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the South transitioned from this solidly Democratic region to one that is today largely recognized as solidly Republican, through the platforms of key politicians had on …show more content…
Truman who was a part of the mainstream Democratic, was credited desegregation of the armed forces in 1948. (Cobb 8). This term created some upheaval in the views of the Southern Democrats, so they formed their own party, which is referred to as the Dixie-Crats. The main people who was associated with this party were Thurman, Goldwater, and Wallace. These people were highly against the role of “big government”, which could control things such as desegregation not only in the armed forces, but in other situations as well. The Dixie-Crats; however, were never successful in winning the majority vote because they only appealed to the racial extremists (Boles

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nixon presented the plan in conservative terms—as a program that would reduce the supervisory role of the federal government and make welfare recipients responsible for their own lives.…

    • 3158 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History 202 Term Paper

    • 1020 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One school of thought presented in the article was the classical view on Reconstruction, which was prevalent from the end of the 1800s all the way through the 1960s. The historians who created and defended this viewpoint believed that Reconstruction was an abject failure for America. It was rife with corruption in all levels of the government and pushed an agenda of black supremacy that threatened white culture. The ‘Redeemers’ (southern Democrats) who eventually overthrew the abolitionists’ corrupt movement, were heroes who saved the southern way of life and white culture. Foner articulated this viewpoint as such, “vindictive Radical Republicans fastened black supremacy upon the defeated South, unleashing an orgy of corruption presided over by unscrupulous carpetbaggers, traitorous scalawags, and ignorant freedmen.”2…

    • 1020 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Congress at the Grassroots

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Richard Fenno's work, Congress at the Grassroots, provides an in depth look at the decline of the old time politics of the South in the late twentieth century. Fenno's case study examines a more recent era but confronts some of the same problems faced by the fictional governor. With changing times and technologies, how do the politics and politicians of the past fare with the modern era? In an effort to examine the recent political shifts in the Deep South and its Congressional districts, the author selected a noteworthy area--the district held by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Instead of selecting the controversial Gingrich as an illustration of change, Fenno chose a long-time Democratic predecessor and the Republican heir to the Georgia district. The area south of Atlanta, for generations a rural, conservative Democratic area, quickly changed to a suburban, Republican-dominated one from the 1950s to the 1990s. Fenno's goal was to provide an in depth look at this dramatic change that impacted the South and the entire nation. He also sought to examine these relationships as a cause in the increasing "polarization, along party lines" of the House of Representatives which made Congress "less civil, less manageable, and, to many, a less satisfying process" (p. 151).…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will argue that liberal neutrality is necessary to maintain optimal utility in a multicultural society. Benjamin L. Berger argues that liberal neutrality and legal tolerance cater to the dominant culture, I agree with this, however I will argue that the dominant culture should be prioritized in order to achieve the maximal amount of happiness for the aggregate of society.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hollitz Essay

    • 574 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas A. Bailey’s, The Ordeal of Reconstruction (1966), presents a view that would claim the that the actions of the Northern ‘carpetbaggers’ and ‘scalawags’ were both “selfish and idealistic” in regards to the Republican government in the Southern states. Meanwhile, Bailey paints a sad picture of the once enslaved and uneducated Negroes of the Republican government, a role that he attributed as “pathetic and tragic.”…

    • 574 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Civil War, the government had changed from a republican rule to a democratic rule that had hatred towards the South because of conflicts that had arisen during the Civil War. The Northern Republicans wanted to punish the South by forming laws that terminated slavery and granted freed blacks the right to vote, the right to own land, the right to due process, and outlawed discrimination based on race; all were attempts to try and end slavery by reconstructing the justice and social and economic equality among freed blacks. In theory, the thought of reconstruction was practical and could end slavery however, a thought is never the same when put into physical use because there are unforeseen obstacles that cannot be avoided such as the invention of sharecropping, the lynchings of blacks, the court case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, “Jim Crow” laws, and the cooperation of white southerners to adhere to these new laws.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is possible as well that some critics believe Clinton’s voice represents her lack of capability to be president because her pitch is closer to that of a child’s than a man’s voice typically is. The correlations found in West and Zimmerman’s research on the nature of interruptions in conversations between men and women and parents and children reveals a potential explanation as to why women in politics may be received with less conviction. West and Zimmerman concluded that men interrupt women similarly to how adults interrupt children. According to their findings, women are more likely to be ignored or restricted by the men they are speaking with and men interrupt when they deem what a woman is saying is problematic (West and Zimmerman).…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trump's Argument Analysis

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Clinton stated that Trump was for the war in Iraq, even though Trump claims he wasn’t. This is a major claim that is made against Clinton by her opponents. This response was perfect for her current opponent so that his argument cannot be made stronger using this point against her.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hello there Carl Rogers, I saw your response on my discussion post, sometimes it is hard to accept whether I have schizophrenia…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “By voting, we add our voice to the chorus that forms opinions and the basis for actions” - Jens Stoltenberg. This quote by Stoltenberg shows us how by voting we are giving our own opinion towards the matter and your opinions will help the actions. Everybody’s opinion matters and they all should receive the right treatment. A poll should be fair to treat everybody's opinion the same since it decides the outcome and the actions to be taken. Something should be done to prevent from an over strict system that allows tremendously few choices and filters for certain ideas.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the decreased use of drone from the Bush to the Obama administration, many people are wondering whether or not drone strike have been beneficial to the United Stats and the countries they are protecting. Considering the countless lives taken and the anger towards the United States, on the other hand, many people would agree that a strong military defense is vital in securing the safety of all Americans and their allies. How ever so is long-term peace and stability for one’s country, which the Obama administration has not been able to deliver in the Middle East. Although this may be true that the Obama administration has achieved its goal by disrupting terrorist plots…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As Michelle Obama said: “Being president does not change who you are. But it reveals who you are.” During the first few months, he is causing more problems than there was before. Getting rid of DACA, trying to ban Muslims, and much more. Donald Trump is abusing his powers. He’s saying “let’s get rid of immigrants,” when his wife is one. It’s not fair that people who are immigrant workers in the US, pay taxes, make money, go to school, have to be deported back home just because the so-called president does not like their race, religion, ethnicity, or sexuality. It’s cruel and unfair to them. I understand if you don’t like a particular race but do not make an assumption about who they are as a group of people, calling Mexicans criminals and rapist…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When a child falls over in the middle of the street, do you help him? The normal response to this question on this question is “yes” and without empirical data, I think I can claim that far over 90% of the people will agree. It is the normal thing to do, regardless of external or internal motives or any other reasons of benefit for the individual. The question is, why? Clearly, the child is in need of help and you are able to provide it, regardless of circumstance. When taking a scientific approach however, the common sense explanation of “doing the normal thing” falls apart. Expected Utility Theory (EUT), also known as Standard Economic Theory (SET), explains this behavior as irrational for several reasons. For instance, people are supposed to always maximize pleasure, whereas helping someone shows no immediate “payoff” for the passerby. The same goes for the argument that humans will always optimize the reward to be gained by their actions, as they are limited in resources. When you consider for instance time a resource, it is…

    • 2128 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument Analysis

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments are an integral part of human society, and structuring these arguments properly is important to emphasize a point. In the documentary I Can Change Your Mind About Climate, many legitimate and illegitimate arguments are put forward to the viewer. Some of these arguments are structurally wrong, and in some of them the premises are not relevant to the conclusion.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Analysis

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Zoos have been around for a very long time, does that make them an old tradition or something wrong that is past its time and is no longer welcome in our more modern civilized society? There are many advocators that want to keep zoos around and others that say zoos are inhumane and wish to abolish them. Personally I agree with both sides in some perspectives. For one I think that zoos are an important part of culture and that should stay to educate future people about the importance of preserving the wonderful animals of the earth. On the other hand I feel that animals dont like being caged up in zoos and would rather be free than put there for the amusement of onlookers.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays