Liberal Pacifism Essay
Liberalism claims that republics have created a new way of states interacting that leans towards a peaceful outcome. Liberalism assumes when governments promote freedom for their people, it produces peace between the government and the people. Governments founded on respect for individuals liberty exercise restraint and peaceful intentions in their foreign policy; liberal states tend to have peaceful interactions with other liberal states. The premise is the people know what is best for the state and would choose a government that would avoid wars. In the case of an empire (control by one individual or class of people ruling over others), if the emperor decided he wanted to have war, he would not listen to a group of merchants who did not
…show more content…
A Liberal institution has a meaningful objective in that the government must meet its citizens demands. Therefore, a president of a state must listen to their people. If the people of a liberal institution are upset with their government, the people can cause the government to change. Liberal Pacifism makes it so that the government must listen to its people. According to Liberal Pacifism, Liberal institutions appear to make the world more pacifistic and therefore less likely to have war. The current republic type governments give us an insight into the future that if every government in the world was a liberal democracy, it becomes likely that the possibility of war vanishes. Also on this view, a state with a liberal institution does not have to trade with and therefore not go to war with a state that does not have a democratic form of government. Doyle is highly optimistic and begins with the assumption of materialistic monism. The idea behind materialistic monism is when a state focuses on non-economic objectives such as glory, prestige, ideology, or pure power of ruling. This term implies that, for instance, if England and France wanted to go to war over religion, they should consider how much money it will cost them. If both states recognize how costly war is, both most likely will not
A Liberal institution has a meaningful objective in that the government must meet its citizens demands. Therefore, a president of a state must listen to their people. If the people of a liberal institution are upset with their government, the people can cause the government to change. Liberal Pacifism makes it so that the government must listen to its people. According to Liberal Pacifism, Liberal institutions appear to make the world more pacifistic and therefore less likely to have war. The current republic type governments give us an insight into the future that if every government in the world was a liberal democracy, it becomes likely that the possibility of war vanishes. Also on this view, a state with a liberal institution does not have to trade with and therefore not go to war with a state that does not have a democratic form of government. Doyle is highly optimistic and begins with the assumption of materialistic monism. The idea behind materialistic monism is when a state focuses on non-economic objectives such as glory, prestige, ideology, or pure power of ruling. This term implies that, for instance, if England and France wanted to go to war over religion, they should consider how much money it will cost them. If both states recognize how costly war is, both most likely will not