2.0 CASE STUDY
On April 20, 2010 the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, owned and operated by Transocean and drilling for BP in the Macondo Prospect oil field, during the final phases of drilling the exploratory well at Macondo, experienced an explosion and sank 50 miles off the …show more content…
There are four principle ethical perspectives related to the case which have not been taken in consideration to avoid the catastrophe. The first one is duty which is concerned with people’s obligations to others. This duty could be often recognised as universal and natural. There were some obligations to environment and ecology that the parties in the case as BP, Transocean and Halliburton had to consider. Moreover there is the obligation of the organizations and the employees to the rest of society as consumers, other organizations and governments that could have been affected by an event like that. Relationship focuses on the attention that emerges in and through communication. The third one is utility which is referred to the outcomes or