Leibniz's Problem Of Evil
One of the oldest and most popular dilemma in philosophy is also one of the greatest threats to the Christian theology. The problem of evil baffles some of the greatest minds in the world and nearly effects everyone in their everyday life. If god is so great, then why is there evil? The problem of evil has to do with god, it is very easy to comprehend. It is primary object to the overall existence does god exist? The problem of evil that Leibniz speaks of is one that deals with the notion that the existence of evil in the world is incompatible with a complete Devine being. Perhaps Theresa reason why god permits all evil in the world? There are two types of evil moral and natural evil. Many people will tell you evil is a necessary part of the world. It has been
…show more content…
When something is corrupted, its corruption is an evil because it is so much a privation of the good. Whenever things are consumed by corruption not even the corruption remains for it is nothing to itself having no subsistent in which exist. From this it follows that there is no evil if there is no good. A good that does not have an evil aspect is perfectly good. Even if there is a little bit of evil in something its good turns out to be defective. Thus, leading to that there cannot be good without evil. Per the logical problem of evil, it is impossible for god and an evil being to coexist. If evil exist then god cannot exist, since evil exist it follows that god does not exist. The problem with this argument is that there’s no logically reason to think that god and evil are logically incompatible. Most atheists purpose that god cannot have a morally sufficient reason to allow all the evils we have in the world. But this assumption is not true. For if it is possible that god has morally suffient reasons for evil to exist then it follows that god and evil are able to co-exist, and that does seem logically possible. The populistic problem of evil according to this problem the “ co-existence of god and
When something is corrupted, its corruption is an evil because it is so much a privation of the good. Whenever things are consumed by corruption not even the corruption remains for it is nothing to itself having no subsistent in which exist. From this it follows that there is no evil if there is no good. A good that does not have an evil aspect is perfectly good. Even if there is a little bit of evil in something its good turns out to be defective. Thus, leading to that there cannot be good without evil. Per the logical problem of evil, it is impossible for god and an evil being to coexist. If evil exist then god cannot exist, since evil exist it follows that god does not exist. The problem with this argument is that there’s no logically reason to think that god and evil are logically incompatible. Most atheists purpose that god cannot have a morally sufficient reason to allow all the evils we have in the world. But this assumption is not true. For if it is possible that god has morally suffient reasons for evil to exist then it follows that god and evil are able to co-exist, and that does seem logically possible. The populistic problem of evil according to this problem the “ co-existence of god and