Legitimacy and Procedural Justice
The policing article simply gives the reader in detail explanation on Legitimacy and Procedure Justice, followed by examples and criminal issues in policing. The main topics are the complete definitions, importance and differences between the two.
While discussing legitimacy, the actual term reflects the belief that the police ought to be able to exercise their authority to maintain social order, manage conflicts and solve problems in their communities. It has three judgments; Public trust, confidence in the police, willingness of the residents. The citizens need to believe that the police are honest in order to have trust in them. They also need to be willing to go to the law if there is a problem. Lastly, they need to believe the polices actions are appropriate and morally justified with given circumstances. Procedural justice is the idea of fairness in the processes that resolve disputes and allocate resources. One aspect of procedural justice is related to discussions of the administration of justice and legal proceedings. It is defined by four issues. First People will have the opportunity to explain their side of the story to an officer so that they too can have a voice. People want to have the option to present evidence to the officer and then the officer can make a decision on what to do. Second people will react to the evidence that the authorities have. Third people are really sensitive to the way they are treated. They want to be treated with dignity and politeness and they want to see that their rights are being respected. Lastly, people will always focus on the communication between the officer and themselves. They will react favorably when they feel the authority has gained their trust.
The difference between the two concepts of legitimacy and legality is that legitimacy basically refers to the judgments that ordinary people make about the authority of the police just to make a decision on how...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document