Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Legalize Euthanasia: The Right to Live or Die

Good Essays
630 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legalize Euthanasia: The Right to Live or Die
Legalize Euthanasia
One of the most controversial problems is whether or not the act of euthanasia should be legal. One suggestion is that it should be legal to those who are in a vegetative state, severely hopeless, and wish to no longer live. Euthanasia is the act of killing or permitting the death of a hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. (Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary 11th Ed) We all have freedom of choice so those who insist on having euthanasia should have the right to receive it.
Some religious peoples views believe it is not god's way to end a life in such a way. That he/she should leave a death in god's hands. Not every person in the world believes in a religion or have the same views. One can argue that some religious people use the act of euthanasia for their own benefit. “All of the protesters who demonized Micheal Schiavo as a cruel husband took a very personal tragedy that did not involve them and turned it into a symbolic fight for their own religious and political views. They fell to their knees and wept and prayed so that the whole world could see how christian they were. Their demonstrations were all about themselves, not Terri Schiavo.” (Culture of life? Right to die or not.) Michael Schiavo just wanted to respect his wife's wishes on choosing to die rather than to stay in a vegetative state. Religious views should not have any part of the process of euthanasia.
Many people that are terminally ill on life-support suffer severely and also are brain dead. There are families out in the world that believe there is a chance for their relative's survival. In
Renderos 2 reality if a person is completely brain dead, there is no chance. “When I hear debates on euthanasia, I tell myself that while I respect the principles, the convictions, at the bottom of my heart I still say there are limits to suffering that can be imposed on a human.” (“Making a case for Euthanasia.”) It is true no one should have to suffer in their misery if they wish not to. Death is a destination we all share, there is no way to escape it. It is time to face reality and let go of a relative who is suffering.
Many people also believe a physician should have no part in assisting a suicide. That they should only help a person when in need. When a patient asks a physician for help for a merciful death, the physician does not become a killer, he/she is only respecting a patient's wishes. “Denying physician-assisted suicide as an option to terminally ill patients means enforced suffering for many patients...whether through common-law development in the courts or by legislative action, it is time to move on to the next stage in making laws that show greater respect for patient autonomy and increased compassion for the plight of the terminally ill.” (“Hastening Death: The Seven Deadly Sins of the Status Quo.”) Making this a law will give patients the right to live or die when they believe it is time to go. This can also lower the harmful suicide rates due to depression and other problems a patient faces.
Euthanasia, a peaceful way to die if it becomes legal. This will help a person end their suffering painlessly. This also gives people the help of a physician they want to receive. Wouldnt you rather know your loved one can call a quits on their life a painless way rather than them actually harming themselves? Euthanasia can help everyone suffering end the pain and also give them another choice to do with their life.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If I had a family member in a similar situation, I would have made the decision to discontinue all life sustaining measures the moment that I knew that there was no brain activity and no chance of recovery. I believe that it is cruel to keep a person alive when there is no hope of…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is defined as the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment. Euthanasia, today, has become a very controversial topic. The issue and question at hand is whether or not to allow euthanasia. We are questioned to let the ill have a prolonged life mechanically but miserably, assisting suicide, or natural death. Many people see death as an inevitable part of life while others fear it and want to strive to live on. However, the issues that are around euthanasia are not only about death, they are about ones right to privacy and control over their own body; in other words the fourteenth amendment.…

    • 612 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    involves life and death issues. For over 2000 years it has been a prohibited medical…

    • 5176 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This basis is essential if the patient is to feel as though he or she is not abandoning all responsibility toward the family. However, this is not to say that the decision to end one 's life does not come without significant shock and sadness; indeed, while family members can be supportive and understanding on the one hand, this does not preclude them from also being extremely shaken and mournful on the other. There is quite a lot to be taken into consideration when endorsing a loved one 's euthanasia request; however, the ultimate decision is to always and ultimately rest with the terminally ill patient (Kowalski…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is therefore necessary and proper for those whose practical life is null and void due to being comatose ,in a vegetative state of being or suffering from terminal illness according to supporters of euthanasia. The brain is the epic center of our functionality as humans. If a person is in unbearable pain and close to death or is in a vegetative state and no longer able to function, their life is by all practical means over. I…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you were told you had a terminally ill disease and only had one more year to live, filled with suffering, what would you chose to do? This question leads us to the sensitive and controversial topic of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia can simply be defined as physician-assisted death for terminally ill patients. This issue has stirred debates that have drawn attention to the complex issues concerning the ethical implications of end-of-life care. Supporters of euthanasia argue that they seek only to prevent unnecessary suffering while the critics maintain that it is unethical to end an individual’s life. However, many public opinions have reported that over 80% of the general population support amendments in the law to…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Currently, in the United States, 12% of states, including Vermont, Oregon, and California have legalized the Right to Die. This debate around whether or not to help patients who have terminal illness end their lives has been and is still far from over. The definition of Right to Die is, “an individual who has been certified by a physician as having an illness or physical condition which can be reasonably be expected to result in death in 24 months or less after the date of the certification” (Terminally Ill Law & Legal Definition 1). With this definition, the Right to Die ought to be available to any person that is determined terminally ill, as determined by a professional.…

    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Choosing the time to die is a very sensitive and controversial topic of around the world and as people suffering from terminal illness make the hard choices to seek an end to their suffering, governments debate the legality, ethics, and morality of physician-assisted suicide. As thousands of people around the world suffer from terminal illnesses, it is important to explore options that allow people to make the choice to die on their terms and physician-assisted suicide is one option for people looking to end their lives on their terms with dignity.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper is a discussion of whether or not a person has the right to choose to die, also seen as death with dignity, or is this a matter to be decided by legislation? An important part of understanding the ideas presented within this context includes knowledge of the terminology that is used. Words that are commonly misused or misunderstood include autonomy, euthanasia (active and passive), physician assisted suicide (PAS), and physician assisted death (PAD). These terms are important aspects to both sides of the debate. The position that argues in favor of one’s right to die generally cites anecdotal evidence to make its point and counts Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act among one of the more successful models in support of the argument. The opponent’s arguments are rooted more along the lines of religious agendas and medical/ethical issues. The argument in favor of a persons right to die is a logical and persuasive one. It offers strong support by drawing parallels between things such as “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and a persons right to choose not only life but death as well. Unfortunately this is not a black and white issue, it has no right or wrong answer and as such there will probably be no resolution anytime soon.…

    • 2434 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Euthanasia

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide "Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Frequently Asked Questions," www.internationaltaskforce.org, Jan. 2010…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antigone

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death with Dignity

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “An individual’s right to choose the time and circumstance of his or her death and/or to seek assistance in facilitating death should be guaranteed and protected by law” ( (Issitt and Newton). The choice of a terminally ill patient to end their life is only legally protected in three states here in the United States: Oregon, Washington and Montana. There are several other countries that allow for “physician-assisted suicide” and in most cases without the restriction of residency- Zurich, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. These countries only offer this assistance to people who are terminally ill and of sound mind.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taking a human life achieves none of these objectives. Subsequently, helping to kill is the opposite of what medicine is and does. The Catholic Health Association of the United States and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops claimed (2002) “What virtually every state regards as a crime, indeed as a form of homicide, does not become “medicine” simply because the perpetrator is a doctor, the patient is terminally ill, or one state one state has decided to rescind its own criminal penalties for the act.” At the end of the day, euthanasia is still considered taking away a human…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays