Preview

Legality of Security Work

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
806 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legality of Security Work
The Legality of Security Work
Name:
University:

The Legality of Security Work
Private security is non-governmental security related protection. It includes private investigation (PI), uniformed security (armed or unarmed), and executive protection, private security companies (PSC), security systems and private limited companies. Civil liability, which is a factor of private security, arises when an offence is both a crime and a tort. Civil actions can be brought against any private security personnel who go against the law. Civil law can be divided into three categories: strict liability, intentional liability and negligence liability.
Negligence liability arises when a person has a duty to act reasonably but fails to do so, resulting injuries. The elements of negligent liability include the existence of some duty owed or duty to protect. Employers are expected to protect their employees and the public. If an employee injures another, the employer and the company will be held liable for negligent retention since by an employer hiring a security officer, that does not relieve him from responsibility. The concept ‘respondent superior’ helps to explain that premises owners cannot delegate their responsibilities. The employer can only escape liability if he proves the existence of non-delegable duty. Otherwise, he would be fall under vicarious liability where the employer carries the burden of his employee.
The other element of negligent liability arises when there is a foreseeable likelihood of an incident occurring, but the owner and or security officers do not take steps to reduce its likelihood; then they will be sued if the incident occurs. E.g. if, in a certain region, a number of attacks have taken place, then there is a likelihood that more attacks will occur. If the owner and security officers fail to take action to prevent more attacks happening, they may be sued if the attacks occur.
Failure to meet a reasonable standard of care and proximate cause



References: Gallati, R. R. J. (1983). Introduction to private security. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall. American Law Institute. (1920). Legal liability. Philadelphia, Pa: American Law Institute. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Vicarious liability for employers and respondeat superior are words that can be used to research cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, and regulations that relate to the scenario. Negligence within the scope of employment is a phrase that can be used to perform a search for law reviews and journals, treatises, Restatements, dictionaries, and the Restatement of…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lavr Johnson Wheaton Case

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wheaton is liable for the manager’s injuries. Under the doctrine of Respondeat Superior Liability. The principle in this case would be Wheaton and the agent would be LaVar Johnson. Under this doctrine an employer is liable for torts committed by agents, who are employees and who commit the tort while acting within the scope their employment, in addition, it also makes the principal liable both for an employees' negligence and for her intentional torts (pg. 944).…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cheeseman (2013), negligence is a "A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions" (p.91). The elements of negligence include:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 8217 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Business owners and landlords have a duty to protect patrons and tenants from foreseeable criminal acts of third parties occurring on their premises.…

    • 8217 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A common sequence of possible case wherever a respondent superior comes into action, if somebody gets injury in a car accident. When the other driver's conduct caused the injury, responsibility could go to his/her employer. Although, it would only be happen if the accident happened all through the driver's scope of service.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Good evening Richard, great response. I agree with your response. Before 9/11 private security was not as helpful as they are now. After 9/11 private security are now well known. Almost every businesses hired private security companies to provide security service for their assets. Private security officials do more than just providing security for private businesses assets, they also provide the best customers service. Many private security agencies officers are well trained in many field such as investigation, CPR, Self Defense, Verbal Judo, fire armed and more. Private Security officials knows the community they work in very well, they can also spot out things out of the ordinary. They know the people within that area as well because they…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dilemma

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mr. Mapp, assuming Mr. DiDomenico as a generic store security guard, would use the theory of respondeat superior to claim that Gimbels is liable for his injuries sustained. This theory states the employers/principals are responsible for the conduct of their employees, assuming they are acting in the scope of their employment. However, Mr. Mapp’s approach to this theory would not be successful because Mr. DiDomenico is an employee of J.C. Penney’s and not an employee of Gimbels. Gimbels never hired DiDomenico so him acting upon himself to apprehend Mr. Mapp is not part of his scope of employment. The only way Gimbels would be responsible for Mr. Mapp’s injuries would be if DiDomenico were an actual employee for the company and, the attack would then be related to the duties of the employment and the assault would have then occurred within work-related limits of time and place.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are different licensing requirements and legal authority that govern private security in each state. These differences govern every aspect of behavior that private security must follow. They include training courses as well as registration. Also discussed in this essay is the legal authority of security guards over the legal authority of public law enforcement officers.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    You Decide

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "The Court in Bricker v. Snook, (1989) Ohio App. LEXIS 1076 stated “It is the universally accepted rule that an employer is liable for personal injuries or the death of another person, or injury to another person's property caused by his employee's negligence, misconduct, misfeasance, or wrongful, improper, or unlawful acts, when done within the scope of his authority, whether the authority is express or implied, or inferred from the general course of business…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The historical development of private security in the United States has changed drastically over the centuries. The need for private security has grown as well. There are many gaps and areas for intrusion within the current public law enforcement system, almost mandating the necessity for private security. As the need and expectations for the private security grows, so will the qualifications for these positions. Understanding the history of the industry development creates a way to learn from the past, and make necessary changes for the future. Private security is the backbone of the American culture, and will continually evolve to prevent and protect society from any type of potential harm.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the policing business are two paths for person to choose from. These two paths are made up of public policing or private security. Both roads have many things that are similar and notable differences in which it defines each one’s purpose and responsibility. Public policiong…

    • 1601 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    306 ABCD

    • 2615 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The employer, the workers and the individuals being supported have responsibilities to ensure safety is maintained in the workplace.…

    • 2615 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Ethics Healthcare

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The legal concept of vicarious liability and the Doctrine of Respondeat Superior occurs when the employee commits a tort or civil wrong within the scope of employment and the employer is held liable although the master may have done nothing wrong( Regan 2002). Physicians and other healthcare providers need to be aware of this doctrine in the supervision of their staff and their day-to-day medical practice.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone is responsible for health and safety in any setting. In my setting my manager has the ultimate responsibility, secondly is my deputy manager. The senior’s in my setting are responsible for their area, any accident, incident or near miss must be reported to my senior.…

    • 3370 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Private security officers are primarily responsible for protecting and securing institutions, businesses, and residences. They patrol properties and ensure safety codes are enforced. They do not have legal privileges as police officers but some are armed and in some cases can make arrests, depending on their training and licensing or the grounds they patrol. They also work…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics